DEUTSCHE BANK analysts wanted FEDs to investigate Trump/Kushner moneylaund'g--2016!!

[Centerleftfl]

WTH? Deutche Bank ITSELF recommended that the FEDS come in and look at Trump ORG after computer analytics set off alarms. Who the hell ROLLED at Deutsche Bank
and WHY in 2016??

WE NEED TO SEE ALL THE RECORDS!!


Deutsche Bank analysts recommended Feds investigate possible Trump and Kushner money-laundering in 2016: report


TOM BOGGIONI
19 MAY 2019 AT 12:50 ET


FILE PHOTO - U.S. President Donald Trump and his senior advisor Jared Kushner arrive for a meeting with manufacturing CEOs at the White House in Washington, DC, U.S. February 23, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque


According to a Sunday morning report in the New York Times, analysts employed by Deutsche Bank who specialize in money-laundering recommended the bank notify federal investigators about possible criminal activity in accounts controlled by President Donald Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner.
Those warnings started back in 2016.

The reports states, “The transactions, some of which involved Mr. Trump’s now-defunct foundation, set off alerts in a computer system designed to detect illicit activity, according to five current and former bank employees. Compliance staff members who then reviewed the transactions prepared so-called suspicious activity reports that they believed should be sent to a unit of the Treasury Department that polices financial crimes.”

According to the Times, higher-ups at the bank that was deeply in bed with the two to the tune of billions of dollars in loans rejected their employees’ advice and the federal government was never alerted.
You can read more here.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/deu...n-2016-report/

[Legion]

So they say.

[bhoyal]

WTH? Deutche Bank ITSELF recommended that the FEDS come in and look at Trump ORG after computer analytics set off alarms. Who the hell ROLLED at Deutsche Bank
and WHY in 2016??

WE NEED TO SEE ALL THE RECORDS!!


Deutsche Bank analysts recommended Feds investigate possible Trump and Kushner money-laundering in 2016: report


TOM BOGGIONI
19 MAY 2019 AT 12:50 ET


FILE PHOTO - U.S. President Donald Trump and his senior advisor Jared Kushner arrive for a meeting with manufacturing CEOs at the White House in Washington, DC, U.S. February 23, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque


According to a Sunday morning report in the New York Times, analysts employed by Deutsche Bank who specialize in money-laundering recommended the bank notify federal investigators about possible criminal activity in accounts controlled by President Donald Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner.
Those warnings started back in 2016.

The reports states, “The transactions, some of which involved Mr. Trump’s now-defunct foundation, set off alerts in a computer system designed to detect illicit activity, according to five current and former bank employees. Compliance staff members who then reviewed the transactions prepared so-called suspicious activity reports that they believed should be sent to a unit of the Treasury Department that polices financial crimes.”

According to the Times, higher-ups at the bank that was deeply in bed with the two to the tune of billions of dollars in loans rejected their employees’ advice and the federal government was never alerted.
You can read more here.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/05/deu...n-2016-report/

Trump-Jail.jpg

LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

[Earl]

President Trump:

“The Failing New York Times (it will pass away when I leave office in 6 years), and others of the Fake News Media, keep writing phony stories about how I didn’t use many banks because they didn’t want to do business with me,” Trump wrote, kicking off a flurry of posts. “WRONG! It is because I didn’t need money. Very old fashioned, but true. When you don’t need or want money, you don’t need or want banks. Banks have always been available to me, they want to make money.”

[Centerleftfl]

So they say.

They sure did. OR they are making up 'retroactive' lies to make Trump look bad? Which is the more plausible to you?

[CharacterAssassin]

President Trump:

“The Failing New York Times (it will pass away when I leave office in 6 years), and others of the Fake News Media, keep writing phony stories about how I didn’t use many banks because they didn’t want to do business with me,” Trump wrote, kicking off a flurry of posts. “WRONG! It is because I didn’t need money. Very old fashioned, but true. When you don’t need or want money, you don’t need or want banks. Banks have always been available to me, they want to make money.”

So you openly admit that twump is a mobbed up Russian whore with a lifelong history of money-laundering?

Oh. OK!

[Earl]

A big nothing burger.

What happened to “collusion”?

[Centerleftfl]

Trump-Jail.jpg

LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

He should have been and now we know--DECADES AGO! What a PIECE OF SHIT!

[Legion]

They sure did. OR they are making up 'retroactive' lies to make Trump look bad? Which is the more plausible to you?

Why speculate?

Get back to me when you have a criminal conviction.

[Earl]

What happened to collusion with the Russians”?

[Legion]

A big nothing burger.

What happened to “collusion”?

How many times a day does some liberal breathlessly inform the world that this time...

 

[Centerleftfl]

President Trump:

“The Failing New York Times (it will pass away when I leave office in 6 years), and others of the Fake News Media, keep writing phony stories about how I didn’t use many banks because they didn’t want to do business with me,” Trump wrote, kicking off a flurry of posts. “WRONG! It is because I didn’t need money. Very old fashioned, but true. When you don’t need or want money, you don’t need or want banks. Banks have always been available to me, they want to make money.”

Just give it a rest. You really do look stupid with this hackneyed argument.

[Earl]

How many times a day does some liberal breathlessly inform the world that this time...

 

Indeed, Legion...Indeed.

[Earl]

Let’s be clear. The American people saw the Mueller report...no collusion, insufficient evidence to pursue obstruction. No further indictments
They have moved on,.

Now the investigation of the investigators is happening...as we speak.

[Legion]

Indeed, Legion...Indeed.

Is this IT?