Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: Never Let Democrats Get Near The Intelligence Community

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default Never Let Democrats Get Near The Intelligence Community

    I knew this fifty years ago:

    During the height of the Cold War I knew one thing above everything else: Never let Democrats come anywhere near an intelligence agency. I began pounding on Democrats infiltrating the intelligence community on my first message board in 2000. Today, Democrats control the entire intelligence community through the Director of National Intelligence. God only knows what Democrats are doing to the country in the Department of Homeland Security.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...35#post2860435

    QUESTION: So why are Democrats still controlling the intelligence community? ANSWER: Because Establishment Republicans are cowards at best and U.N.-loving traitors at worst.

    It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones. Calvin Coolidge

    Take at good look at then-Senator Harry Reid and Senator Patrick Leahy glowing over an idiot:




    President George W. Bush signs the Patriot Act. White House photo by Eric Draper.

    NOTE: Senator Leaky Leahy has been betraying this country’s sovereignty since 1974.

    WASHINGTON. No Democrat or Republican, let alone members of the media, have stated the obvious regarding the discredited Russia collusion hoax. That there was no collusion. Dead stop. Over. Not to mention the ensuing two-year investigative witch-hunt waged against President Donald Trump.

    The CIA and FBI abused their powers largely thanks to the Patriot Act. Ironically, this legislation was passed by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by a Republican president.

    The unpatriotic Patriot Act

    In October of 2001, and following 9/11, President George W. Bush told the nation that the Patriot Act would “give intelligence and law enforcement officials important new tools to fight a present danger.”

    It was assumed – foolishly – that the threat was from terrorism.

    But when and as reauthorized, the Patriot Act during the administration of President Barack Obama, Obama claimed that tweaks to the act would allow US law enforcement to better target homegrown “lone wolves.”

    Again, the assumption – a foolish one – assumed that the targets would largely be self-motivated terrorists.

    Terrorists like Boston Marathon bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. But leave it to official Washington to stretch any legal definitions beyond their original, intended scope.

    A spy’s attack on the Constitution


    Former CIA director John Brennan. MSNBC screen capture.


    Congress originally designed the Patriot Act as a tool to enhance the fight against terrorism. In part, it required that we put our Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure on hold. This point became crystal clear to members of the Senate Intelligence Committee and their staffs when, in July of 2014, the CIA issued an apology for spying on them. That apology, however, followed months of denials by then-CIA Director John Brennan.

    Outraged Senate Democrat Tom Udall of New Mexico erupted.

    “The CIA unconstitutionally spied on Congress by hacking into Senate intelligence committee computers. This grave misconduct is not only illegal, but it violates the US Constitution’s requirement of separation of powers. These offenses, along with other errors in judgment by some at the CIA, demonstrate a tremendous failure of leadership, and there must be consequences.”

    Udall added he had “lost confidence” in Brennan and demanded his resignation. But Brennan stayed on.

    As Obama White House spokesman Josh Earnest explained, the duplicitous spymaster was “operating in a very difficult environment to ensure the safety of the American public” and was a man who had “a very difficult job, who does that job extraordinarily well.”

    How “extraordinarily well” Brennan did his job became abundantly clear following the election of Donald Trump as the nation’s 45th president. Arguably, the revised Patriot Act helped enable the Russia collusion hoax designed to bring down President Trump.

    A meeting of minds: John Brennan and Christopher Steele


    British spy Christopher Steele. CBS News screen capture.


    Last week, a source elaborated on the Brennan connection to Fox News, the only credible news network covering the Russia collusion delusion.

    “… a late-2016 email chain indicated then-FBI Director James Comey told bureau subordinates that then-CIA Director John Brennan insisted the [Christopher Steele anti-Trump] dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA [Intelligence Community Assessment].”

    You may recall what Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr – a vehement never-Trump Republican – said of the ICA report in July of 2018.

    “The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions.”

    Further, the ICA states:

    “We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”


    The “chains of the Constitution” and the Patriot Act

    But PresidentTrump now finds himself cleared of the dubious charge he was a double agent working on behalf of Moscow. So now, the truthfulness, or lack thereof, of Brennan’s CIA assessment of Russian “meddling” in the 2016 presidential election becomes clear. It exists as nothing more than a lame appendix to the dubious and discredited Steele dossier.

    As already noted, the expanded police powers granted the federal government under the Patriot Act suspended the constitutional guarantee for Americans to “be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects.”

    It did so in the name of combating terrorism.

    Patriot Act enabled Russia collusion hoax and further Deep State treachery

    This extra-constitutional license to conduct domestic spying gave un-elected and secretive federal agencies the confidence to launch a political disinformation campaign. An operation whose clear aim was to remove the American republic’s duly elected head of state. It would attempt to do so enabled via the now-discredited Russia collusion hoax.

    The man under whose watch this unconstitutional abomination occurred is on record regarding his dislike for the Founder’s ideas concerning a government of limited, “enumerated powers.”


    President Obama. Photo: White House.


    He called the US Constitution

    “…a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.”

    Unsurprisingly, this man was President Barack Obama.

    The man whose administration, armed with the extraordinary powers granted it by imprudent Republicans in their Patriot Act, did what he and his political party believed they “must do on your behalf.”

    So how come media mouths still suck up to a filthy piece of garbage knowing what he did to this country for eight years? The kindest thing I can say about media parasites is that they do not know Americans would be speaking Russian today had this country not won the Cold War 23 years before the lying sack of shit made Brennan CIA Director (March 2013 to January 2017).


    The foresightfulness of this Nation’s Founding Fathers

    In the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, what Thomas Jefferson wrote still rings true:

    “In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”

    These constitutional chains are important instruments of freedom that today’s Americans would be wise to dust off. They were originally designed by our foresightful Founding Fathers to fetter government functionaries. Functionaries, elected or appointed, Republican or Democrat.

    Functionaries whose overconfidence in their power and brilliance can fundamentally transform them into the intractable enemies of American liberty.


    Patriot Act enabled Russia collusion hoax and further Deep State treachery
    by Stephen Z. Nemo
    May 19, 2019

    https://www.commdiginews.com/politic...achery-119012/

    Finally, turnabout is fair play. Since Democrats are determined to impeach President Trump for a crime he did not commit, it is fair to impeach —— or punish Obama in a criminal court —— for crimes he did commit.


    USA: Can a President be impeached after leaving office?

    https://www.quora.com/USA-Can-a-Pres...leaving-office

    Hillary Clinton stands a good chance of being tried, convicted, and sent to jail for the crimes she committed as secretary of state. An indictment and conviction surely applies to Obama when he was president.

    Finally, as far as I know there is no statute of limitations on the types of crimes federal officials commit. So just one conviction based on evidence discovered after an official leaves office will send an everlasting caution to federal officials while they are in office.

    Basically, jail time will never discourage the average criminal. But if you compare government officials to Prohibition era gangsters and today’s drug gangs you have to conclude that high-ranking federal officials are guilty of every crime that does not require courage because they have always been immune to prosecution.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Flanders For This Post:

    MAGA MAN (05-20-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    They should fire anyone who is a registered Democrat.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MAGA MAN For This Post:

    Flanders (05-20-2019), Minister of Truth (05-25-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    I knew this fifty years ago:

    During the height of the Cold War I knew one thing above everything else: Never let Democrats come anywhere near an intelligence agency. I began pounding on Democrats infiltrating the intelligence community on my first message board in 2000. Today, Democrats control the entire intelligence community through the Director of National Intelligence. God only knows what Democrats are doing to the country in the Department of Homeland Security.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...35#post2860435

    QUESTION: So why are Democrats still controlling the intelligence community? ANSWER: Because Establishment Republicans are cowards at best and U.N.-loving traitors at worst.

    It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones. Calvin Coolidge

    Take at good look at then-Senator Harry Reid and Senator Patrick Leahy glowing over an idiot:




    President George W. Bush signs the Patriot Act. White House photo by Eric Draper.

    NOTE: Senator Leaky Leahy has been betraying this country’s sovereignty since 1974.

    WASHINGTON. No Democrat or Republican, let alone members of the media, have stated the obvious regarding the discredited Russia collusion hoax. That there was no collusion. Dead stop. Over. Not to mention the ensuing two-year investigative witch-hunt waged against President Donald Trump.

    The CIA and FBI abused their powers largely thanks to the Patriot Act. Ironically, this legislation was passed by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by a Republican president.

    The unpatriotic Patriot Act

    In October of 2001, and following 9/11, President George W. Bush told the nation that the Patriot Act would “give intelligence and law enforcement officials important new tools to fight a present danger.”

    It was assumed – foolishly – that the threat was from terrorism.

    But when and as reauthorized, the Patriot Act during the administration of President Barack Obama, Obama claimed that tweaks to the act would allow US law enforcement to better target homegrown “lone wolves.”

    Again, the assumption – a foolish one – assumed that the targets would largely be self-motivated terrorists.

    Terrorists like Boston Marathon bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. But leave it to official Washington to stretch any legal definitions beyond their original, intended scope.

    A spy’s attack on the Constitution


    Former CIA director John Brennan. MSNBC screen capture.


    Congress originally designed the Patriot Act as a tool to enhance the fight against terrorism. In part, it required that we put our Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure on hold. This point became crystal clear to members of the Senate Intelligence Committee and their staffs when, in July of 2014, the CIA issued an apology for spying on them. That apology, however, followed months of denials by then-CIA Director John Brennan.

    Outraged Senate Democrat Tom Udall of New Mexico erupted.

    “The CIA unconstitutionally spied on Congress by hacking into Senate intelligence committee computers. This grave misconduct is not only illegal, but it violates the US Constitution’s requirement of separation of powers. These offenses, along with other errors in judgment by some at the CIA, demonstrate a tremendous failure of leadership, and there must be consequences.”

    Udall added he had “lost confidence” in Brennan and demanded his resignation. But Brennan stayed on.

    As Obama White House spokesman Josh Earnest explained, the duplicitous spymaster was “operating in a very difficult environment to ensure the safety of the American public” and was a man who had “a very difficult job, who does that job extraordinarily well.”

    How “extraordinarily well” Brennan did his job became abundantly clear following the election of Donald Trump as the nation’s 45th president. Arguably, the revised Patriot Act helped enable the Russia collusion hoax designed to bring down President Trump.

    A meeting of minds: John Brennan and Christopher Steele


    British spy Christopher Steele. CBS News screen capture.


    Last week, a source elaborated on the Brennan connection to Fox News, the only credible news network covering the Russia collusion delusion.

    “… a late-2016 email chain indicated then-FBI Director James Comey told bureau subordinates that then-CIA Director John Brennan insisted the [Christopher Steele anti-Trump] dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA [Intelligence Community Assessment].”

    You may recall what Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr – a vehement never-Trump Republican – said of the ICA report in July of 2018.

    “The Committee has spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions.”

    Further, the ICA states:

    “We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”


    The “chains of the Constitution” and the Patriot Act

    But PresidentTrump now finds himself cleared of the dubious charge he was a double agent working on behalf of Moscow. So now, the truthfulness, or lack thereof, of Brennan’s CIA assessment of Russian “meddling” in the 2016 presidential election becomes clear. It exists as nothing more than a lame appendix to the dubious and discredited Steele dossier.

    As already noted, the expanded police powers granted the federal government under the Patriot Act suspended the constitutional guarantee for Americans to “be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects.”

    It did so in the name of combating terrorism.

    Patriot Act enabled Russia collusion hoax and further Deep State treachery

    This extra-constitutional license to conduct domestic spying gave un-elected and secretive federal agencies the confidence to launch a political disinformation campaign. An operation whose clear aim was to remove the American republic’s duly elected head of state. It would attempt to do so enabled via the now-discredited Russia collusion hoax.

    The man under whose watch this unconstitutional abomination occurred is on record regarding his dislike for the Founder’s ideas concerning a government of limited, “enumerated powers.”


    President Obama. Photo: White House.


    He called the US Constitution

    “…a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.”

    Unsurprisingly, this man was President Barack Obama.

    The man whose administration, armed with the extraordinary powers granted it by imprudent Republicans in their Patriot Act, did what he and his political party believed they “must do on your behalf.”

    So how come media mouths still suck up to a filthy piece of garbage knowing what he did to this country for eight years? The kindest thing I can say about media parasites is that they do not know Americans would be speaking Russian today had this country not won the Cold War 23 years before the lying sack of shit made Brennan CIA Director (March 2013 to January 2017).


    The foresightfulness of this Nation’s Founding Fathers

    In the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, what Thomas Jefferson wrote still rings true:

    “In questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”

    These constitutional chains are important instruments of freedom that today’s Americans would be wise to dust off. They were originally designed by our foresightful Founding Fathers to fetter government functionaries. Functionaries, elected or appointed, Republican or Democrat.

    Functionaries whose overconfidence in their power and brilliance can fundamentally transform them into the intractable enemies of American liberty.


    Patriot Act enabled Russia collusion hoax and further Deep State treachery
    by Stephen Z. Nemo
    May 19, 2019

    Finally, turnabout is fair play. Since Democrats are determined to impeach President Trump for a crime he did not commit, it is fair to impeach —— or punish Obama in a criminal court —— for crimes he did commit.


    USA: Can a President be impeached after leaving office?

    https://www.quora.com/USA-Can-a-Pres...leaving-office

    Hillary Clinton stands a good chance of being tried, convicted, and sent to jail for the crimes she committed as secretary of state. An indictment and conviction surely applies to Obama when he was president.

    Finally, as far as I know there is no statute of limitations on the types of crimes federal officials commit. So just one conviction based on evidence discovered after an official leaves office will send an everlasting caution to federal officials while they are in office.

    Basically, jail time will never discourage the average criminal. But if you compare government officials to Prohibition era gangsters and today’s drug gangs you have to conclude that high-ranking federal officials are guilty of every crime that does not require courage because they have always been immune to prosecution.
    Fun to watch you run like a whore from the IC demonstrating MASSIVE legal jeopardy for Donnie Moscow.

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,560
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 2,936 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Groans
    852
    Groaned 948 Times in 862 Posts

    Default

    The vast majority of agents and leadership are Republicans. That includes Comey and Mueller. The agencies are absolutely not Dem strongholds. Some just see the danger that Trump presents to the country and the constitution.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Gonzomin For This Post:

    JPF (06-04-2019)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzomin View Post
    The vast majority of agents and leadership are Republicans.
    Who told you that?

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Soul View Post
    They should fire anyone who is a registered Democrat.
    hmmmmm

    thought crimes?



    see folks these are russo bot holes NOT Americans

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    hmmmmm thought crimes?
    Not if you believe that DEMOCRATS are incapable of thought.

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    see folks these are russo bot holes NOT Americans
    Prove it.

    LINK

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    37,741
    Thanks
    21,918
    Thanked 12,581 Times in 9,703 Posts
    Groans
    4,312
    Groaned 1,312 Times in 1,210 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    hmmmmm

    thought crimes?



    see folks these are russo bot holes NOT Americans
    not a crime just disqualified

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,506
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 9,834 Times in 6,110 Posts
    Groans
    422
    Groaned 710 Times in 658 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Because they might make it intelligent, and cast away the veils you rely on?

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Jade Dragon For This Post:

    jimmymccready (05-24-2019)

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    Hillary Clinton stands a good chance of being tried, convicted, and sent to jail for the crimes she committed as secretary of state.
    I will settle for a stay in the Gray Bar Hotel for spying:


    President Trump on Thursday night issued a memo giving Attorney General William Barr the authority to declassify any documents related to surveillance of the Trump campaign in 2016.

    I wait with bated breath for Democrats in the intelligence community to comply:

    Trump also ordered the intelligence community to cooperate with Barr. The memo read: "The heads of elements of the intelligence community... and the heads of each department or agency that includes an element of the intelligence community shall promptly provide such assistance and information as the Attorney General may request in connection with that review."

    "Today, at the request and recommendation of the Attorney General of the United States, President Donald J. Trump directed the intelligence community to quickly and fully cooperate with the Attorney General’s investigation into surveillance activities during the 2016 Presidential election," White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement.


    "The Attorney General has also been delegated full and complete authority to declassify information pertaining to this investigation, in accordance with the long-established standards for handling classified information. Today’s action will help ensure that all Americans learn the truth about the events that occurred, and the actions that were taken, during the last Presidential election and will restore confidence in our public institutions."

    In a Twitter message late Thursday, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani defended the president's action.

    "The President @realDonaldTrump made a wise decision to let AG Barr on the documents," Giuliani wrote. "I don’t know for sure but I seriously doubt there’s any national security concern but some of it could affect pending investigations. I’m sure AG and DOJ will make a very appropriate decision."

    U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, blasted the move as an attempt to "weaponize law enforcement and classified information."

    Trump claims his campaign was the victim of "spying," though the intelligence community has insisted it acted lawfully in following leads in the Russia investigation.

    The president had told Fox News earlier in May that he would allow declassification "soon." He elaborated, "I didn’t want to do it originally because I wanted to wait, because I know what they -- you know I’ve seen the way they play. They play very dirty."

    Last month, Barr ran into a buzz saw of criticism from Democratic lawmakers and media figures for testifying that “spying did occur” against the Trump campaign in 2016. But despite the backlash, Barr appeared to be referring to intelligence collection that already has been widely reported and confirmed.

    Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page are currently the subject of a Justice Department inspector general investigation looking at potential misconduct in the issuance of those warrants. That review also reportedly is scrutinizing the role of an FBI informant who had contacts with Trump advisers in the early stages of the Russia investigation.



    You say surveillance and I say spying. Let’s NOT call the whole thing off:

    The use of the term "spying" as it applies to the FBI's surveillance in 2016 has been fiercely disputed. The New York Times, even as it reported last year on how the FBI sent an informant to speak to campaign advisers amid concerns about suspicious Russia contacts, stated that this was to "investigate" Russia ties and "not to spy."

    “I think spying did occur. The question is whether it was adequately predicated,” Barr testified last month, adding that he believed it is his “obligation” to review whether there was misconduct in the original investigation. “Congress is usually very concerned with intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies staying in their proper lane.”

    He added that “spying on a political campaign is a big deal.”

    President Trump backed the attorney general's testimony, saying the same day Barr testified last month that he thinks what Barr said "was absolutely true," adding, "There was absolutely spying into my campaign.” [AND IT WAS DONE IN COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS]

    Democrats, though, charged that the testimony indicated Barr was a compromised witness.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told the Associated Press last month that she doesn’t “trust Barr,” but she trusts Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., accused Barr of “peddling conspiracy theories.”

    Fox News' Catherine Herridge, John Roberts, Brooke Singman and the Associated Press contributed to this report.


    Trump gives AG Barr authority to declassify documents related to 2016 campaign surveillance
    Talia Kaplan
    May 24, 2019

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tru...n-surveillance
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Flanders, I remember your first posts. You were an idiot then and a drooler now.

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Flanders, I remember your first posts. You were an idiot then and a drooler now.
    To jimmymccready: The T-word should really spoil your weekend, asshole.

    President Donald Trump accused multiple former FBI officials Thursday of committing treason for their role in the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

    Trump Accuses James Comey, Andrew McCabe Of Treason
    McCabe Of Treason
    Amber Athey | White House Correspondent
    6:06 PM 05/23/2019

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/23/t...trzok-treason/
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Very good, fruitcake Flanders: Tword is all Trump's. He has earned it, and he will go to jail after his term in office. Even if he resigns and Pence pardons him, the staties have plenty of charges and evidence to send him up to Attica.

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To jimmymccready: The T-word should really spoil your weekend, asshole.

    President Donald Trump accused multiple former FBI officials Thursday of committing treason for their role in the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

    Trump Accuses James Comey, Andrew McCabe Of Treason
    McCabe Of Treason
    Amber Athey | White House Correspondent
    6:06 PM 05/23/2019

    https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/23/t...trzok-treason/
    trump accusing Comey and McCabe (or anybody, for that matter) of treason shows what a stunning ignoramus he really is. Disagreeing with trump is treason in his mind.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    JPF (06-04-2019), Phantasmal (05-24-2019)

  20. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Nothing of import against the Dems will be revealed.

    Much against Trump and the Pubs will be revealed.

    If they try to block it, the info will now be leaked.

Similar Threads

  1. Trump says he believes Putin over the US Intelligence Community
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-19-2019, 09:47 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-07-2018, 08:11 PM
  3. Didn't intelligence community say? Yup they did!
    By volsrock in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-16-2018, 05:00 PM
  4. Replies: 109
    Last Post: 03-25-2017, 04:13 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-21-2017, 03:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •