Don't be fooled Folks

[archives]

Well friend I do believe William Barr has testified that he had ask Mueller why he made no recommendation concerning obstruction by the President and if it was because of the unresolved issue of the legality of indicting a sitting President, and Mueller said "NO!" Have you read the Mueller report? If you have, point out specifically where in the report your claim is proven. I personally watched all of Barr's testimony before the Senate committee. That's where my recollections are coming from.

Now there is your first mistake, believing anything Barr said, if we have learned anything over the last two months it is that Barr is a political hack appointed specifically to defend Trump

And it all could be resolved if Mueller testifies, but you know Barr and Trump regardless of what they say will go to any ends to make sure that doesn't happen

[CharacterAssassin]

Don’t be fooled folks, House Democrats are whining and bitching that a President can’t be indicted for a crime, otherwise Trump would have been indicted by Mueller. All of that horseshit is nothing but theater for their rabid mad junkyard dog democrat base voters.

Now for some real facts, the legal argument of whether a sitting President can be indicted for a crime has never yet been decided in the courts. So, if the Trump hater Mueller thought for a single second there was enough evidence that Trump had committed obstruction, he’d have indicted him and thrown the entire issue into the courts.

The stupid argument that a sitting President can or cannot be indicted for a crime is absurd & irrelevant to begin with. The Constitution provides the impeachment process which is by definition an indictment of a sitting President. Dictionary.com says an impeachment is a “ formal accusation/charge.” Dictionary.com also says that an indictment is a formal accusation/charge. So if the screaming rabid mad junkyard dog democrats truly want to indict this President, all they have to do is pass articles of impeachment through the House Of Representatives where they hold a majority.

More honesty, reality and facts show us that Democrats don’t want to impeach this President Donald J. Trump, their theater show in the Congress & perpetuated on CNN & MSNBC has a single agenda, TRASH TRUMP & BARR BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION. Democrats have no solutions for the real issues facing America, so they’re campaigning on Trump & Barr Hate. Democrats are the party of hate & the unwitting dupes & agents of Vladimir Putin who’s agenda is to divide & conquer America.

No, shitheap, impeachment in the house is not the same thing as a criminal indictment.

[Heff]

Don’t be fooled folks, House Democrats are whining and bitching that a President can’t be indicted for a crime, otherwise Trump would have been indicted by Mueller. All of that horseshit is nothing but theater for their rabid mad junkyard dog democrat base voters.

Now for some real facts, the legal argument of whether a sitting President can be indicted for a crime has never yet been decided in the courts. So, if the Trump hater Mueller thought for a single second there was enough evidence that Trump had committed obstruction, he’d have indicted him and thrown the entire issue into the courts.

The stupid argument that a sitting President can or cannot be indicted for a crime is absurd & irrelevant to begin with. The Constitution provides the impeachment process which is by definition an indictment of a sitting President. Dictionary.com says an impeachment is a “ formal accusation/charge.” Dictionary.com also says that an indictment is a formal accusation/charge. So if the screaming rabid mad junkyard dog democrats truly want to indict this President, all they have to do is pass articles of impeachment through the House Of Representatives where they hold a majority.

More honesty, reality and facts show us that Democrats don’t want to impeach this President Donald J. Trump, their theater show in the Congress & perpetuated on CNN & MSNBC has a single agenda, TRASH TRUMP & BARR BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION. Democrats have no solutions for the real issues facing America, so they’re campaigning on Trump & Barr Hate. Democrats are the party of hate & the unwitting dupes & agents of Vladimir Putin who’s agenda is to divide & conquer America.

Yes, it's all a big charade so their followers can be duped by the cloud of suspicion, just like they were in 2018.

[Robo]

Now there is your first mistake, believing anything Barr said, if we have learned anything over the last two months it is that Barr is a political hack appointed specifically to defend Trump

So you’re a non-believer in due process, right? You’ve convicted Barr without any testimony from Mueller.

I’ll wait for Mueller’s testimony if the Democrats ever call him to testify. What seems to be the hold up with that? Nadler seems “quick draw McGraw” when it comes to subpoenas for everybody but Mueller. Could it possibly be they don’t want to hear what the author of the Mueller Report has to say face to face, under oath, they just want to put on a theater show of contempt of Congress for the Republican bureaucrats that don’t hate Trump?

And it all could be resolved if Mueller testifies, but you know Barr and Trump regardless of what they say will go to any ends to make sure that doesn't happen

To my knowledge, Nadler hasn’t called Mueller to testify, do you know differently?

[Robo]

No, shitheap, impeachment in the house is not the same thing as a criminal indictment.

I thank you for your juvenile sandbox insult. You're momma must be proud, huh?

Impeachments are indictments for high crimes & misdemeanors, i.e. "crimes" They're simply the system for criminally indicting Presidents, Judges & appointed and confirmed bureaucrats.

[CharacterAssassin]

I thank you for your juvenile sandbox insult. You're momma must be proud, huh?

Impeachments are indictments fore high crimes & misdemeanors, i.e. "crimes" They're simply the system for criminally indicting Presidents, Judges & appointed and confirmed bureaucrats.

Irrelevant, silly whore. What Mueller was addressing were actual criminal indictments, whether or not he could issue them. Impeachment isn't the same thing.

Not that you'd actually know, being an admitted drunk.

[Robo]

Irrelevant, silly whore. What Mueller was addressing were actual criminal indictments, whether or not he could issue them. Impeachment isn't the same thing.

Not that you'd actually know, being an admitted drunk.

I thank you again child for your silly immature insult proving you have no civility or high enough intellect to debate without attempting to make folks think you're some tough nasty big shot. We both know you're well below tough or a big shot.

I'd suggest you take a peak at a dictionary friend and then get back to me with the difference between an article of impeachment and and any other criminal indictment aside form the impeachment is reserved for Presidents, Judges & some others in the governing body with the trial to be held in the Senate of the United States conducted by a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, while any other criminal indictment for civilians requires that a trial be held in a court of law. an article to impeach & an indictment are both criminal accusations.

[CharacterAssassin]

I thank you again child for your silly immature insult proving you have no civility or high enough intellect to debate without attempting to make folks think you're some tough nasty big shot. We both know you're well below tough or a big shot.

I'd suggest you take a peak at a dictionary friend and then get back to me with the difference between an article of impeachment and and any other criminal indictment aside form the impeachment is reserved for Presidents, Judges & some others in the governing body with the trial to be held in the Senate of the United States conducted by a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, while any other criminal indictment for civilians requires that a trial be held in a court of law. an article to impeach & an indictment are both criminal accusations.

LOL! And there it is. I accept your surrender and your admission that you're a lying whore.

Nice owning you.

[Gonzomin]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

[canceled.2021.2]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

Cry harder for me

[archives]

So you’re a non-believer in due process, right? You’ve convicted Barr without any testimony from Mueller.

I’ll wait for Mueller’s testimony if the Democrats ever call him to testify. What seems to be the hold up with that? Nadler seems “quick draw McGraw” when it comes to subpoenas for everybody but Mueller. Could it possibly be they don’t want to hear what the author of the Mueller Report has to say face to face, under oath, they just want to put on a theater show of contempt of Congress for the Republican bureaucrats that don’t hate Trump?

To my knowledge, Nadler hasn’t called Mueller to testify, do you know differently?

I "convicted" Barr? Of what?

Barr is a political hack, there is no doubt there, Trump didn't appoint him cause he thought Barr was the best for the job, he selected him specifically cause he knew Barr would be his lap dog, don't you recall Trump's complaint with Sessions, that he "didn't have his back?"

Mueller still technically works for the Justice Dept, meaning Trump can bar him from testifying, don't you recall the "executive privilege" defense, and as we have seen with McGhan, even if Mueller leaves the Justice Dept.

[archives]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

And there it is in a nutshell

Trump, as he has done his entire life, will litigate the hell out of anything that comes even close to tainting him. Regardless of the absurdity of his case, he will keep at it knowing eventually his boys on the SCOTUS will hear it, and as directed, decide in his favor. You'd have to be totally naive to think he appointed "I like beer" Brett to the Court cause he thought he was the best candidate

[Robo]

Trump is into delay tactics. He would love to see Dems take him to court. Then he could delay it with lawyers and changes of venue until his criminal ass runs out the clock. One of his first presidential plans was stacking the courts. McConnell has been complicit in the criminal enterprise. Trump did it because he knew he was going to need friendly judges to help him. He cannot allow judges in who go by the law.

And Obama appointed only non-partisan judges, right? Could you please submit Trumps crimes? I’ll understand if you can’t!!!!!

[Truth Detector]

More honesty, reality and facts show us that Democrats don’t want to impeach this President Donald J. Trump, their theater show in the Congress & perpetuated on CNN & MSNBC has a single agenda, TRASH TRUMP & BARR BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION. Democrats have no solutions for the real issues facing America, so they’re campaigning on Trump & Barr Hate. Democrats are the party of hate & the unwitting dupes & agents of Vladimir Putin who’s agenda is to divide & conquer America.

Spot on!

[Truth Detector]

You are deep in your TDS. Mueller stated in his report that he didn't consider indicting Trump because of DOJ policy. There's plenty of credible evidence for impeachment, a lot more than there is for indicting Hillary.

This is a pile of bullshit, par for the course with idiots like you.

Provide me the page and specific language you attribute to Mueller. Mueller is not prevented from recommending indictment for criminal actions. He didn't recommend it due to the FACT there was little in the way of evidence to support the nonsensical claims that a President would obstruct an investigation where wrong doing never occurred.

It's obvious that Trumps election has exposed the liberal left as the mentallly retarded Fascists we have always known them to be. Another good reason to re-elect Trump.