Grokmaster (05-20-2019)
South Bend, Ind. Mayor Pete Buttigieg told Fox News Sunday night that his comments about rechristening events named after Thomas Jefferson were "a great example ... of how the media noise machine on the right wing takes things out of control."
"You would have thought I had proposed blowing up the Jefferson Memorial in D.C.," Buttigieg told moderator Chris Wallace during his Fox News town hall in Claremont, N.H.
On Friday, Buttigieg discussed the Indiana Democratic Party's decision to change the name of the traditional Jefferson-Jackson Dinner during a radio interview on "The Hugh Hewitt Show."
BUTTIGIEG TAKES ON TRUMP, PITCHES FOUR NEW TAX HIKES IN FOX NEWS TOWN HALL
"I think it's the right thing to do," said Buttigieg, who added: "There's a lot, of course, to admire in his [Jefferson's] thinking and his philosophy, but then again if you plunge into his writings, especially the notes on the state of Virginia, you know that he knew slavery was wrong."
Buttigieg added that "we're finding in a million different ways that racism isn't some curiosity out of the past that we're embarrassed about but moved on from. It's alive. It's well. It's hurting people and it's one of the main reasons to be in politics today is to try to change or reverse the harms that went along with that."
On Sunday, Buttigieg pointed out: "My campaign office is actually on Jefferson Boulevard [in South Bend]" before claiming that he meant to say that "I think there’s a reason why Democratic parties, when we’re thinking about, for the future, our events, especially thinking about how burning of an issue something like racial equity is, we’re thinking twice about naming our events after Jefferson and Jackson."
"Basically, I said that we’re rethinking how Democratic functions might name our event," Buttigieg added. "Maybe we should name it for a person who’s living. Maybe we should name it after a person of color. I don’t know."
The 37-year-old then lamented what he called "this mentality that pervades the Twittersphere and its one of the things that we gotta get over in this campaign, is actually be ready to listen to each other. And I know nuance doesn't do great on cable or on Twitter, but at the very least we've gotta actually hear each other out."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pet...out-of-control
Grokmaster (05-20-2019)
what? I can't follow his yammering
Grokmaster (05-20-2019)
On fiscal policy, Buttigieg pushed for four distinct tax hikes when asked about the deficit, saying he favored a "fairer, which means higher" marginal income tax, a "reasonable" wealth tax "or something like that," a financial transactions tax, and closing "corporate tax loopholes."
Earl (05-20-2019), Grokmaster (05-20-2019), Stretch (05-20-2019)
The nice thing about being a Republican is we never have to debate about renaming the annual Lincoln Day dinners. Democrats inherited the tradition of Jefferson-Jackson dinners, and, it's been quite educational. Also, fuck Jackson.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
tsuke (05-21-2019)
Grokmaster (05-20-2019), Rune (05-20-2019)
Grokmaster (05-20-2019)
anatta (05-20-2019), Earl (05-20-2019), Grokmaster (05-20-2019)
that's probably enough to cost him the nomination, as if being interviewed by FOX wasn't enough........
Earl (05-20-2019), Grokmaster (05-20-2019)
Grokmaster (05-20-2019)
CharacterAssassin (05-20-2019), domer76 (05-20-2019), Rune (05-20-2019)
Earl (05-20-2019)
Meh, I don’t see Pete gaining much traction.
Biden is probably the most likely nominee. I’m also not sure whether the country is ready for a gay president and his ‘first husband’ lol? One of the problems with identity politics is it assumes the different blocs of ‘oppressed’ segments of voters will support one another at the polls.
Many blacks for example, are fairly socially conservative. It’s a virtual given they won’t turn out for a Democrat candidate [like they did for Obama] just because he’s gay. The same probably holds for Hispanics, many of whom are socially conservative Catholics.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
anonymoose (05-20-2019), Earl (05-20-2019)
Earl (05-20-2019)
domer76 (05-20-2019)
Good point lol.
AOC went postal after Biden said he was going to take a ‘middle of the road’ approach to climate change or whatever. That said, Biden has the double digit lead in the polls. It goes back to the civil war in the Democrat Party: the moderates vs the radicals. The biggest threat to Trump would be a Democrat opponent who doesn’t have The Crazy.
And that looks like Crazy Joe at the moment. But he would still be a weak candidate, imo. Just a bigger threat relative the rest of the bunch. And as you alluded to, it’s questionable whether the hard lefties would turn out for him.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Earl (05-20-2019)
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
Earl (05-20-2019)
Bookmarks