Originally Posted by
Legion
But it was one in the paper Y O U cited.
Really? Are you sure?
Yet you invested your entire argument on it, didn't you?
Not at all. You hare investing your entire argument on it since you haven't read the paper. The paper states that warming is part of the reason for the cooling of the oceans.
Is that so? It seems you don't understand that calling it a "statement" instead of a question (which the article poses) is disingenuous at best.
What question do you think the the article poses? Since you haven't read the paper, you are arguing something that you know nothing about.
You have no idea what I have or haven't read. Clearly I have read your pitiful excuse for an argument.
It is clear you haven't read the paper otherwise you wouldn't be questioning whether warming was part of the cause of the ocean cooling around Greenland. My statements are supported by the paper you haven't read.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
Bookmarks