other judges have the unredacted Mueller report and can do the same
the republican party is bleeding out
yawn
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
other judges have the unredacted Mueller report and can do the same
the republican party is bleeding out
WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same
Cinnabar (05-17-2019)
Stretch (05-17-2019)
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
dukkha (05-18-2019)
You obviously have no experience with grand juries. There is no defense, only prosecutors using the lies of "witnesses" and their own "ideas" rather than physical evidence. In my opinion, grand juries are unconstitutional because they can, and do, indict someone without any physical evidence.
Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.
WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
Perhaps you should read your own post. It refutes THIS:
.Posted by RB 60
You obviously have no experience with grand juries. There is no defense, only prosecutors using the lies of "witnesses" and their own "ideas" rather than physical evidence. In my opinion, grand juries are unconstitutional because they can, and do, indict someone without any physical evidence.
In NO WAY.
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
RB60 wrote....
I posted words from the US Constitution that say this..You obviously have no experience with grand juries. There is no defense, only prosecutors using the lies of "witnesses" and their own "ideas" rather than physical evidence. In my opinion, grand juries are unconstitutional because they can, and do, indict someone without any physical evidence.
Are you of the opinion that the US Constitution can be unconstitutional?"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,"
My pointing out that grand juries are required in certain cases by the US Constitution would mean their use can't be unconstitutional. It clearly refutes RB60's opinion.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
I am saying the founders felt grand juries were required to put some restrictions on overzealous prosecutions.
Think for a moment about how the grand jury process works then consider giving the sole power of indictment to the person that presents is working to get a grand jury to indict.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.
So you would have preferred the prosecutor simply make the indictment on their own without having to present any evidence to a GJ?
I would guess that if the prosecutor used lies and less than credible witnesses to get the indictment that your classmate was found not guilty very quickly, right?
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
Stretch (05-20-2019)
Bookmarks