Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

[StoneByStone]

Nope and the two aren't equal, no matter how hard you try.

Why is one pointless and the other not?

[StoneByStone]

Then why do liberals want to protect bird and turtle eggs, seeing as how they're not alive??

Because they're material that can eventually become alive.

[USFREEDOM911]

Why is one pointless and the other not?

Because you're trying to equate one that's mentioned in the Constitution and one isn't.

[USFREEDOM911]

Because they're material that can eventually become alive.

But according to liberals, they're just a collection of cells and of no value.

[Tkaffen]

If banning guns is pointless because people can just get guns on the black market, is banning abortion also pointless?

I don’t see the similarities between gun ownership and abortion.

[StoneByStone]

Because you're trying to equate one that's mentioned in the Constitution and one isn't.

I'm not talking about muh constitution. I'm asking people who use the argument that people will always be able to get guns if they are consistent.

[StoneByStone]

I don’t see the similarities between gun ownership and abortion.

I'm not saying there are similarities between the two.

Gun enthusiasts often say gun control doesn't work because people will just get guns on the black market. My question to people who believe that is if they also believe banning abortions won't work because people will just have black market doctors perform abortions.

[StoneByStone]

But according to liberals, they're just a collection of cells and of no value.

A collection of cells can have value. They're just not a living thing yet.

[USFREEDOM911]

I'm not talking about muh constitution. I'm asking people who use the argument that people will always be able to get guns if they are consistent.

But you can't take the Constitution out of the argument; because when you discuss guns, the Constitution is a large part of the discussion.

[USFREEDOM911]

A collection of cells can have value. They're just not a living thing yet.

Then why do liberals hold the collection of cells, of birds and turtles, so high and why do those cells hold more value then human cells??

[StoneByStone]

But you can't take the Constitution out of the argument; because when you discuss guns, the Constitution is a large part of the discussion.

But the question is about consistency in saying making something illegal won't make a difference. Whether or not it's constitutional is a different issue.

[USFREEDOM911]

But the question is about consistency in saying making something illegal won't make a difference. Whether or not it's constitutional is a different issue.

But it's not a different issue; because one is mentioned in the Constitution and one isn't.

[StoneByStone]

Then why do liberals hold the collection of cells, of birds and turtles, so high and why do those cells hold more value then human cells??

That's only for endangered species.

[USFREEDOM911]

That's only for endangered species.

But why are them being considered as being "endangered", make them more valuable then the cells of a human??

[StoneByStone]

But it's not a different issue; because one is mentioned in the Constitution and one isn't.

But the question is will these things happen even if we did make them illegal, not if we should or shouldn't.