Question for our gun enthusiast friends.

[StoneByStone]

NOPE

Are you now reconsidering and willing to say that a law against firearm possession is pointless??

No, because I think laws actually do work against guns and abortions. I'm consistent.

Are you?

[StoneByStone]

You putting your lips on it, helps.

But Incels are so ewww.

[StoneByStone]

What "law" do you think has made a difference with anything??

Not the question. The question is, if laws against gun ownership are pointless due to the black market, are laws against abortion also pointless?

[StoneByStone]

Then we shouldn't have laws against speeding, murder, bank robbery, rape, spousal abuse, car theft, shoplifting, assault, or anything else; because the laws don't stop anything.

So does that mean you do think gun control works?

[StoneByStone]

So when there is no brain activity, the body should be removed from society??

Yes, and it is. Doctors generally consider a person to be dead when the brain stops functioning. Why not be consistent? Life begins and ends with brain activity.

[StoneByStone]

yes, and even though I was a history/pre-law major I apparently know more biology than you do......

You obviously don't since you don't know when life begins.
Do you accept evolution?

[StoneByStone]

I believe that is not true in Georgia.......if brain activity mattered we could still kill lib'ruls......

Those jokes kinda backfire when Conservatives actually do have lower IQ rates on average.

[Into the Night]

That’s because you’re uninformed and stupid. Try reading Heller, stupid fuck.

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution. Heller v dc upheld the Constitution. It didn't try to change it. Maybe YOU should read the results of that case, including the circuit court ruling that was upheld.

[StoneByStone]

If abortion was illegal then the number of abortions would be largely reduced and the number of illegal abortions would slighlty increase but not much.

So would banning guns also greatly reduce the number of people with guns?

[StoneByStone]

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

But it can blatantly ignore muh constitution.

[USFREEDOM911]

I'd be ok with waiting until it's on the way to being a problem. However, right now, there are more than enough humans reproducing.

So you'll wait, as long as it doesn't affect you; so how does abortion affect you?

[USFREEDOM911]

No, because I think laws actually do work against guns and abortions. I'm consistent.

Are you?

Then give one law that worked.

[Into the Night]

It's beginning to look like Stone and some other JPP liberals FEEL that they wouldn't be able to control their violent urges, if they had access to a gun, and therefore want to project their lack of control onto others.

An interesting line of thought. Could it be that this is the real motivation that many liberals have for wanting to ban guns?

...or are they just chanting what they hear from the Church of Karl Marx?

[USFREEDOM911]

But Incels are so ewww.

So you feel badly about your proclivities.

[USFREEDOM911]

Not the question. The question is, if laws against gun ownership are pointless due to the black market, are laws against abortion also pointless?

What "law" do you think has made a difference with anything??