It's a simple statement of objective reality. Clearly something you lack the emotional capacity to face. Bummer.Yes, there was, and Mueller explained it.
There was no concrete barrier preventing him from indicting Trump and since it wouldn’t break any laws Mullet had nothing to fear in that regard.More denial of objective reality.
Mullet didn’t indict Trump *because he didn’t want to*. He was supposed to save you from the Bad Orange Man—and he could have but he didn’t.Nah. He handed a roadmap to congress for even deeper, far reaching investigations into your god.
Mullet betrayed you.
And that's fun!
Silly, spastic cunt, there was no end of collusion. Here, let me help you, simp.
https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/g...FU9EomOQ0vz0DA
No, whore, it didn't. https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/g...FU9EomOQ0vz0DA
Please stop fisting yourself in public.
Just glanced at the live reading....it's like watching paint dry.
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
You idiot. The above is not from the Mueller report. It is some left wing nut portraying what they really really want the Mueller report to say.
Note "though, as Asha Rangappa and I have written, the more analytically precise issues to consider are whether Trump Campaign associates “coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support” to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. "
Notice how it went from coordinated to 'encouraged'. The stupidity of the left never ceases to amaze.
see
the right refuses all FACTS
time to punish them for it
USFREEDOM911 (05-16-2019)
No, you pathetic, miserable cunt, it's a summation of points from the report. And I notice you can't address or refute a single on of them.The report established and demonstrated collusion, sill whore. Your denial of that reality won't change a single thing.
Note "though, as Asha Rangappa and I have written, the more analytically precise issues to consider are whether Trump Campaign associates “coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support” to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. "
Notice how it went from coordinated to 'encouraged'. The stupidity of the left never ceases to amaze.
LMAO... wrong again moron. Your author's 'summation' is full of shit.
"Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks's releases of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election."
LOL! Criminal conspiracy was not established by the available facts beyond a reasonable doubt, silly whore, and I never contended otherwise. Collusion most definitely was.
Fun to watch you wail and scream and still remain incapable of disputing any fact in the summation. If it's so 'full of shit', you'd be able to demonstrate that.
But you can't.
Silly whore, you're really not very good at this.
I suppose when they are finished their reading, then we can really get to the bottom of this huh?
This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT
C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network
Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you
Stretch (05-16-2019)
Bookmarks