Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 258

Thread: DEMS will read the ENTIRE (tho redacted) MUELLER report on House FL THU!

  1. #151 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    No it didn't, silly cunt.
    Yes it did. Black and white. Try improving your reading comprehension skills.

  2. #152 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    reading is hard...umkay?
    they know how to read.

    the problem is they have been gaslit by the deepstate for more than 2 years.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  3. #153 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lying rules View Post
    they know how to read.

    the problem is they have been gaslit by the deepstate for more than 2 years.
    And I will bet the you believed there was a Clinton run child sex trafficking ring in the basement of a pizza parlor.

  4. #154 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Beto Omar View Post
    Mindlessly repeating ‘Mullet couldn’t have’ isn’t an argument.
    It's a simple statement of objective reality. Clearly something you lack the emotional capacity to face. Bummer.

    There was no concrete barrier preventing him from indicting Trump and since it wouldn’t break any laws Mullet had nothing to fear in that regard.
    Yes, there was, and Mueller explained it.

    Mullet didn’t indict Trump *because he didn’t want to*. He was supposed to save you from the Bad Orange Man—and he could have but he didn’t.
    More denial of objective reality.

    Mullet betrayed you.
    Nah. He handed a roadmap to congress for even deeper, far reaching investigations into your god.

    And that's fun!

  5. #155 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lying rules View Post
    "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."
    Silly, spastic cunt, there was no end of collusion. Here, let me help you, simp.

    https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/g...FU9EomOQ0vz0DA

  6. #156 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    Yes it did. Black and white. Try improving your reading comprehension skills.
    No, whore, it didn't. https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/g...FU9EomOQ0vz0DA

    Please stop fisting yourself in public.

  7. #157 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Just glanced at the live reading....it's like watching paint dry.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  8. #158 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    No, whore, it didn't. https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/g...FU9EomOQ0vz0DA

    Please stop fisting yourself in public.
    You idiot. The above is not from the Mueller report. It is some left wing nut portraying what they really really want the Mueller report to say.

    Note "though, as Asha Rangappa and I have written, the more analytically precise issues to consider are whether Trump Campaign associates “coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support” to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. "

    Notice how it went from coordinated to 'encouraged'. The stupidity of the left never ceases to amaze.

  9. #159 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  10. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (05-16-2019)

  11. #160 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    You idiot. The above is not from the Mueller report. It is some left wing nut portraying what they really really want the Mueller report to say.
    No, you pathetic, miserable cunt, it's a summation of points from the report. And I notice you can't address or refute a single on of them.

    Note "though, as Asha Rangappa and I have written, the more analytically precise issues to consider are whether Trump Campaign associates “coordinated with, cooperated with, encouraged, or gave support” to the Russia/WikiLeaks election interference activities. "

    Notice how it went from coordinated to 'encouraged'. The stupidity of the left never ceases to amaze.
    The report established and demonstrated collusion, sill whore. Your denial of that reality won't change a single thing.

  12. #161 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    No, you pathetic, miserable cunt, it's a summation of points from the report. And I notice you can't address or refute a single on of them.

    The report established and demonstrated collusion, sill whore. Your denial of that reality won't change a single thing.
    LMAO... wrong again moron. Your author's 'summation' is full of shit.

    "Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks's releases of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election."

  13. #162 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    LMAO... wrong again moron. Your author's 'summation' is full of shit.

    "Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks's releases of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election."
    LOL! Criminal conspiracy was not established by the available facts beyond a reasonable doubt, silly whore, and I never contended otherwise. Collusion most definitely was.

    Fun to watch you wail and scream and still remain incapable of disputing any fact in the summation. If it's so 'full of shit', you'd be able to demonstrate that.

    But you can't.

    Silly whore, you're really not very good at this.

  14. #163 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    I suppose when they are finished their reading, then we can really get to the bottom of this huh?

    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  15. #164 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    It's a simple statement of objective reality. Clearly something you lack the emotional capacity to face. Bummer.

    Yes, there was, and Mueller explained it.

    More denial of objective reality.

    Nah. He handed a roadmap to congress for even deeper, far reaching investigations into your god.

    And that's fun!
    Mullet explained why he ‘couldn’t’ indict Trump but you’re unable to lol?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Stretch (05-16-2019)

  17. #165 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,462
    Thanks
    16,661
    Thanked 20,733 Times in 14,329 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,386 Times in 1,304 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lying rules View Post
    sure.

    direct quote:



    this is not "not enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt."

    it literally says in black and white "no evidence at all"

    as in zero.

    2 years of fake news.
    Sorry...gonna need more than your carefully redacted snippet.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

Similar Threads

  1. Mueller report actually is a pretty interesting read,
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 04-18-2019, 11:52 PM
  2. Nadler, Pelosi, other Dems blast DOJ ahead of Mueller report release
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-18-2019, 12:24 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2019, 09:06 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-26-2019, 02:33 PM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-25-2019, 10:23 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •