Kavanaugh not so bad, better Scallia.

[Truth Detector]

He’s simply not as conservative as advertised.

When did he advertise how Conservative he is? You sad scarecrow; all these strawmen to construct. The only one's who were raging like lunatics were you losers on the left who did everything BUT burn the house down to keep this good man out. Insults, impugning him, lying about him and posturing. It was a despicable picture of what the Party of the Jackass has devolved into.

[Truth Detector]

You love pouring words in my mouth. Such a lying whiny brat you are.

I R O N Y!!

[Truth Detector]

She won't/can't. She exists here only to attack other posters, not to discuss ideas, politics, or current events.

I R O N Y!!!

[Truth Detector]

Why don't you try looking at what's posted instead of going after particular individuals? What has Kavanaugh done that's so wonderful, so far? Or are you just defending him because you hated Dr. Ford and dissed her and her testimony against Kavanaugh?

What Ford did wasn't testimony. It was a despicable smear campaign intended to destroy a good man and his reputation for purely partisan political purposes. It exposed the raw corrupt rot within the Party of the Jackass and the low levels they are willing to stoop to in order to advance their Fascistic agenda and turn this country into a third world shit hole.

[Truth Detector]

Perhaps, Scalia was a phony who hide his partisanship in pseudo intellectual "arguments" the right pedaled as legitimate, "orginialism?" Brett is just a Trump stooge, he was put there for one particular purpose, to do whatever Trump wants him to do so Trump could control the Judiciary.

Questionable if either could be labeled "better" than the other

Scalia was far more of an accomplished intellect than you could ever hope to be in a million lifetimes snowflake. You're nothing more than a whiny loser on an internet forum full of hate, bile and anger.

[archives]

OTOH, it's quite possible that Kavanaugh said whatever he thought the Toadstool and the Reichwing wanted, just so he could be appointed to the bench.

More than possible, just like Barr, he surely told Trump exactly what he wanted to hear, now Trump has his Roy Cohn as AG and on the SCOTUS

[cawacko]

More than possible, just like Barr, he surely told Trump exactly what he wanted to hear, now Trump has his Roy Cohn as AG and on the SCOTUS

So why the liberal meltdown about his being appointed then?

From a conservative perspective the Federalist society backed him. Did he fool them as well? Were all his previous rulings throughout his career just a big ruse?

[Flash]

So did the person ever get executed?

Yes. The issue was not about his execution but whether it was religious discrimination to allow a Christian minister accompany the person but not a Buddhist adviser.

Shortly before this case the court ruled against a man who wanted his Muslim minister to accompany him but Arkansas would not allow it. I was originally disappointed in this decision but after reading it changed my mind because it was not about discrimination but the man not following the procedures and not making his request in a timely manner.

[archives]

Scalia was far more of an accomplished intellect than you could ever hope to be in a million lifetimes snowflake. You're nothing more than a whiny loser on an internet forum full of hate, bile and anger.

Scalia was never an "accomplished intellect," as I said, he invented his own sophomoric intellectualism that the right wing media sold as legitimate cause it included all the right catch words for the base. And we have seen numerous times here, the last thing a good number on the right have is an understanding of the Constitution other than what they learned in high school

[archives]

So why the liberal meltdown about his being appointed then?

From a conservative perspective the Federalist society backed him. Did he fool them as well? Were all his previous rulings throughout his career just a big ruse?

Brett? Can't find many left of Attila the Hun who thought Brett was qualified, even Roberts had his doubts

And of course the Federalist society backed him, didn't you read the part I mentioned of the right portraying his views as legitimate?

As far as rulings, yes, the more noted ones were bogus, probably the biggest being the Holder case when he decided that he could just skip over the prefatory clause, explain now how that fits into "orginalism"

[Truth Detector]

Scalia was never an "accomplished intellect,"

Yes he was; but then, what would a low IQW dullard like you know about intellect. You can't get anything right. You do know this right? That you are always wrong? Dunce.

as I said, he invented his own sophomoric intellectualism that the right wing media sold as legitimate cause it included all the right catch words for the base. And we have seen numerous times here, the last thing a good number on the right have is an understanding of the Constitution other than what they learned in high school

No one gives a shit what a low IQ lying liberal loser on an internet forum says or thinks snowflake. Scalia's intellect towers over that of an unaccomplished whiny leftist loser with a room temperature IQ.

What have you accomplished in your life that isn't defined by you being stupid and wrong all of the time?

[Truth Detector]

Brett? Can't find many left of Attila the Hun who thought Brett was qualified, even Roberts had his doubts

And of course the Federalist society backed him, didn't you read the part I mentioned of the right portraying his views as legitimate?

As far as rulings, yes, the more noted ones were bogus, probably the biggest being the Holder case when he decided that he could just skip over the prefatory clause, explain now how that fits into "orginalism"

You are the definition of a pathetic moron.

[Callinectes]

we will see


he can be impeached if he starts protecting the Russian party

Can he be impeached for protecting your china party?

[archives]

Yes he was; but then, what would a low IQW dullard like you know about intellect. You can't get anything right. You do know this right? That you are always wrong? Dunce.



No one gives a shit what a low IQ lying liberal loser on an internet forum says or thinks snowflake. Scalia's intellect towers over that of an unaccomplished whiny leftist loser with a room temperature IQ.

What have you accomplished in your life that isn't defined by you being stupid and wrong all of the time?

Translation - "truthie" actually knows little regarding Scalia and most likely the Constitution other than some demagogue told him as proven by the fact he can not refute anything I have authored other than employing his usual personal crapola

Next

[anatta]

Scalia was never an "accomplished intellect," as I said, he invented his own sophomoric intellectualism that the right wing media sold as legitimate cause it included all the right catch words for the base. And we have seen numerous times here, the last thing a good number on the right have is an understanding of the Constitution other than what they learned in high school

Silly Rabbit.

Reliance on the text itself instead of "Original intent" or extrapolating the text to modern times with a "living document"
interpretation is manifestly superior in that you are using the words of the Document itself.