THREADBAN POLL 2019

[Doc Dutch]

Then watch how quickly they demand that it be reinstated. Wasn't it JPP leftists who begged for threadbans in the first place?

Are you coming out of the closet as a Leftist? How many of your threads look like this?:

[Legion]

How many of your threads look like this?

As many as I want.

The JPP community have voted on this issue twice. Threadbans are settled law, it seems.

Cry harder.

[Doc Dutch]

As many as I want.

The JPP community have voted on this issue twice. Threadbans are settled law, it seems.

Cry harder.

The crier is the douchebag who bans disagreement. No worries. Enjoy yourself with your little threads.

[Legion]

APP would finally become a relevant forum if we actually abolished thread bans.

You think the leftists who demanded threadbans in the first place want that?

What I suspect they wanted was a way to ban "cons" from their threads. They didn't think about the fact that "cons" would also be able to ban them. That's the only complaint they seem to have, isn't it?

[Legion]

Enjoy yourself with your little threads.

I shall, and I will enjoy visiting yours whenever I want to.

[Legion]

The crier is the douchebag who bans disagreement.

Really? I'm not the one posting screenshots all over the board whining about who someone else bans, am I?

I don't ban disagreement. I ban habitual trolls.

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

[Doc Dutch]

Really? I'm not the one posting screenshots all over the board whining about who someone else bans, am I?

I don't ban disagreement. I ban habitual trolls.

Why does the truth bother you so much??? You admit it's a screenshot, so why do you hate it being shown? It's true so why are you complaining? Is it because the reason you threadban so many people is that you are a typical bully who hates confrontation? That you strongly dislike disagreeing opinions?

If you habitually banned trolls, you would always do it. As it is, you seem to only do it for the topics you hate to be confronted about just like Trump doesn't want to hear Intel briefings on Russia.

[Legion]

You admit it's a screenshot, so why do you hate it being shown?

I don't recall saying that I hate for it to be shown. I mentioned it because you keep posting it all over the forum as if I'm going to stop using threadbans because you don't like it when I do.

If you habitually banned trolls, you would always do it.

I didn't say that. I said I ban habitual trolls. Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't, obviously. My threads, my choice.

Is there a reason why you appear to be fixated on my frequent use of the threadban while ignoring the widespread use of the feature by others?

[PostmodernProphet]

The crier is the douchebag who bans disagreement.

how are you kept from disagreeing..........you can start your own thread and say whatever you want.......

[Doc Dutch]

how are you kept from disagreeing..........you can start your own thread and say whatever you want.......

True, and I welcome anyone who cares to post, to say what they have to say. Unlike the mass thread banners who are afraid of disagreement. Their choice. My choice to point out their cowardice just as I do with sock puppeteers.

You like to brag about being a Christian then, in a single breath, call people Demmycunts. I like to identify and label cowards and liars.
You have your hobby, I have mine.

[PostmodernProphet]

You like to brag about being a Christian then, in a single breath, call people Demmycunts.

first, when have I ever bragged about my religion........second, why do you think I need two breaths?......

[Doc Dutch]

first, when have I ever bragged about my religion........second, why do you think I need two breaths?......

How else do people know you are a Christian? You certainly don't act like one. Thanks for the confirmation.

[Legion]

I like to identify and label cowards and liars.

Better get busy, then.

It's one thing to thread ban habitual trolls.

I ban people.

I often have a thread ban list when I start a thread.

I don't allow racists, or haters in.

Does not seem cowardly to me. Like other mature adults who respect social etiquette, it just makes sense to exclude known racists, belligerent bigots, girlish gossipers, and libelers from civilized conversation.

I thread banned his ass so he couldn't shit the place up with his stinking shit.

It is every poster's option to ban as many others as he/she decides. It is an exaggeration to say that anyone here is 'banning everyone.'

Banning all the idiots is the best first line of defense.

I've never put anybody on ' Ignore ' but my reserve thread ban serves useful purposes. Once you've been a member for some considerable time here you can anticipate the reaction of the forum trolls to any given topic. Sometimes you might want to investigate a topic with other reasonable members and so you post your ban to eliminate the dross from your thread

There are a handful of posters here who are such good-for-nothing trolls they don't deserve to be allowed to post in my threads. Or anyone else's either. Ergo, I ban only them from every thread I start.

I only ban obvious trolls and posters who blatantly engage in overt racism, misogyny, bigotry, libel, and slander. Those are not forms of "free speech" and they are not even remotely close to conventional political speech. The only reason anyone could make it onto my thread ban list is if they are either a troll, or they are a terrible human being.

The trolls often derail the thread. I think banning trolls is fine.

If you're trying to have a serious discussion, whether it's off-topic or about politics, there are some who just cannot act like adults and should be excluded.

Then I’m a coward and proud of it. I will ignore them and ban them.

[Doc Dutch]

Better get busy, then.

I've been on it for months. Why else would you be so pissed at me?

[Legion]

I've been on it for months. Why else would you be so pissed at me?

Who told you I'm "pissed" at you?