View Poll Results: What should JPP do with its threadban feature?

Voters
48. You may not vote on this poll
  • I am NEUTRAL on this issue. I truly do not care one way or the other.

    10 20.83%
  • KEEP threadbans.

    24 50.00%
  • ABOLISH threadbans

    14 29.17%
Page 4 of 61 FirstFirst 123456781454 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 911

Thread: THREADBAN POLL 2019

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America "clinging to my God and Guns"
    Posts
    9,325
    Thanks
    932
    Thanked 5,709 Times in 4,242 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 154 Times in 147 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    NEVER. I come here to listen to EVERYONE. I'm thinking of the 'Fragile People', we could lose them without the 'thread ban' feature.
    Well OK, I guess. Then why does it matter?
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    16,954
    Thanks
    1,909
    Thanked 5,131 Times in 4,226 Posts
    Groans
    408
    Groaned 704 Times in 692 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Maybe a maximum on any thread,say 5.
    Or none
    Melchizedek

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    14,637
    Thanks
    7,305
    Thanked 4,244 Times in 3,318 Posts
    Groans
    244
    Groaned 451 Times in 419 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Well OK, I guess. Then why does it matter?
    Were you able to read the ENTIRE Reply? "I'm thinking of the 'Fragile People', we could lose them without the 'thread ban' feature."

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    14,637
    Thanks
    7,305
    Thanked 4,244 Times in 3,318 Posts
    Groans
    244
    Groaned 451 Times in 419 Posts

    Default

    Holy Fuck Shit! 15 to 12.

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    8,466
    Thanks
    1,250
    Thanked 4,071 Times in 3,137 Posts
    Groans
    908
    Groaned 216 Times in 205 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTQ64 View Post
    Thread bans are for cowards.
    No they are a way to prevent trolls and idiot's from polluting a thread.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Grumpy For This Post:

    Phantasmal (05-13-2019), Truth Detector (05-13-2019)

  7. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    16,954
    Thanks
    1,909
    Thanked 5,131 Times in 4,226 Posts
    Groans
    408
    Groaned 704 Times in 692 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy View Post
    No they are a way to prevent trolls and idiot's from polluting a thread.
    Like the way,you were thread banned for trolling the Amazon Tavern?
    Melchizedek

  8. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,299
    Thanks
    55,576
    Thanked 23,906 Times in 15,795 Posts
    Groans
    1,768
    Groaned 2,062 Times in 1,935 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TTQ64 View Post
    Thread bans are for cowards.
    Then I’m a coward and proud of it. I do not feel the need to let someone who wishes I get cancer, again, participate in my threads.

    You may do as you please, I will ignore them and ban them.
    Thatís why Iím so screwed up, because I had a father who pushed me so hard,Ē Trump acknowledged in 2007, in a brief and rare moment of self-awareness.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    christiefan915 (05-13-2019), Cypress (05-13-2019), Jack (05-13-2019)

  10. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America "clinging to my God and Guns"
    Posts
    9,325
    Thanks
    932
    Thanked 5,709 Times in 4,242 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 154 Times in 147 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Were you able to read the ENTIRE Reply? "I'm thinking of the 'Fragile People', we could lose them without the 'thread ban' feature."
    Uh, yeah. Again, why does it matter?
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Truth Detector (05-13-2019)

  12. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    57,260
    Thanks
    66,289
    Thanked 10,943 Times in 9,455 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,837 Times in 2,579 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    banning is for the weak
    Wrong; when it comes to trolling morons like Katzgar, characterassasin, evince, Domer and Nomad, it is smart. Allowing fools like these to litter up a thread with nothing but their repetitive moronic bullshit is stupid.
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.


    Eric Holder: ďIím still enjoying what Iím doing, thereís still work to be done,Ē Iím still the Presidentís wing-man, so Iím there with my boy.Ē

  13. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    57,260
    Thanks
    66,289
    Thanked 10,943 Times in 9,455 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,837 Times in 2,579 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    If you're trying to have a serious discussion, whether it's off-topic or about politics, there are some who just cannot act like adults and should be excluded. If you look at almost any political discussion here that has more than 3-4 pages, by the time you get to the last page it's almost always degenerated into "You're a dick," "You're an even bigger dick." Or maybe that's just how it is here, there, and everywhere.
    Members banned from this thread: USFREEDOM911, Havana Moon, TOP, Controlled Opposition, Jack and Yurt
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.


    Eric Holder: ďIím still enjoying what Iím doing, thereís still work to be done,Ē Iím still the Presidentís wing-man, so Iím there with my boy.Ē

  14. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ventura CA
    Posts
    57,260
    Thanks
    66,289
    Thanked 10,943 Times in 9,455 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 2,837 Times in 2,579 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jade Dragon View Post
    I'd say it's needed in off topic discussions. I've tried it without, and always seem to add a few later on. Some just like rock the boat. I'm curious if you are able to check the vote, to see if socks are giving additional votes? Legion loves doing that, and will even do it on an open one.
    Members banned from this thread: USFREEDOM911, Legion, Text Drivers are Killers, Bigdog, Evmetro, TOP, Controlled Opposition, volsrock, Yurt and Earl
    Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.


    Eric Holder: ďIím still enjoying what Iím doing, thereís still work to be done,Ē Iím still the Presidentís wing-man, so Iím there with my boy.Ē

  15. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    14,637
    Thanks
    7,305
    Thanked 4,244 Times in 3,318 Posts
    Groans
    244
    Groaned 451 Times in 419 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Uh, yeah. Again, why does it matter?
    ""I'm thinking of the 'Fragile People', we could lose them without the 'thread ban' feature.""

    Do you want to lose Legina? How about USF? We should ALL have an opportunity to Post. Some of our friends here are timid, frightened of the Real World. They come here to post, but don't want any criticism or difference of opinion. I support ALL people who want to post. I support the 'thread ban' feature.

  16. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    16,954
    Thanks
    1,909
    Thanked 5,131 Times in 4,226 Posts
    Groans
    408
    Groaned 704 Times in 692 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    ""I'm thinking of the 'Fragile People', we could lose them without the 'thread ban' feature.""

    Do you want to lose Legina? How about USF? We should ALL have an opportunity to Post. Some of our friends here are timid, frightened of the Real World. They come here to post, but don't want any criticism or difference of opinion. I support ALL people who want to post. I support the 'thread ban' feature.
    Buck up Jack!
    Melchizedek

  17. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    37,064
    Thanks
    6,624
    Thanked 15,160 Times in 9,180 Posts
    Groans
    1,010
    Groaned 1,403 Times in 1,256 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grumpy View Post
    At first I didn't like the ban but I have found it is useful. I would like to be able to add or remove people from the ban list without asking a mod to do it for me.
    as far as I know that's not possible.
    Biography:

    Grind is one of the internets most beloved and influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era. He rose to prominence in early 2015 when he alleged, contrary to the dominant theory of christiefanism of the time, that Bill Clintons wife was indeed running for president and wasn't considering settling down to be a grandmother. In 2016, Grind was one of the key figures in proposing the new revolutionary theory of "30% is not a rare occurrence" which shook up the JPP political landscape like no other theory ever had before. His academic prowess, deep-level analysis and remarkable insight into human nature and psychology will undoubtedly result in further complexities being untangled and laid bare. He currently resides in boston, his hobbies include #rekking libs, vaping, and patriotism. You can find him in a thread near you.

    Testimonials about my patented system:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grindís got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Grind is away and busy for june For This Post:

    Jack (05-13-2019)

  19. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    14,637
    Thanks
    7,305
    Thanked 4,244 Times in 3,318 Posts
    Groans
    244
    Groaned 451 Times in 419 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MASON View Post
    Buck up Jack!
    I'm 'Bucked'. I have no problem with people having a different opinion. That's why I come here, for the diversity of opinion.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Jack For This Post:

    evince (05-13-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Poll: Mueller Report Sinks Trumpís Approval Rating To New 2019 Low
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-20-2019, 04:21 PM
  2. THREADBAN POLL 2017 (READ THREAD B4 VOTING - BANS POSSIBLE IF YOU DONT READ RULES)
    By Grind is away and busy for june in forum Announcements
    Replies: 285
    Last Post: 07-27-2017, 01:20 PM
  3. Threadban Poll 2017 Now Open for Business
    By Grind is away and busy for june in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2017, 03:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •