The Real Muellergate Scandal

[anatta]

For starters Craig Murray wrote "On the DNC leak, Mueller started with the prejudice that it was “the Russians” and he deliberately and systematically excluded from evidence anything that contradicted that view."

We knew beyond doubt that the Russians strongly favored trump and meddled in the campaign so it wasn't prejudice to explore how far they got in their efforts. It was starting with those facts and seeing where they would lead.

well then that is "prejudical" . Muller was tasked with more then going after Trump he was supposed to look at Russian collusion and meddling. He didn't. he just accepted the fact it was a Fancy Bear op. run by da Russians.

So 40 million dollars later with a scad of FBI investigators, and 2 years of disruptive the presidency and the government, and Mueller doesn't even bother to look at alternative hacked by simply interviewing Assange etc??

Mueller is a partisan hack! all he cared about was his witch hunt.

[anatta]

Are you saying Mueller should have traveled to Britain and talked with Assange at the embassy?

he could have -nothing prevented it. Or he could have tried to get an amnesty in exchange for an interview, and possible testimony..or a phone call.. Since when do investigators sluff off their duties because they have to do more then call in witnesses?

[cancel2 2022]

Are you saying Mueller should have traveled to Britain and talked with Assange at the embassy?

Mueller could have sent somebody to get a signed affidavit and record a video interview. They didn't even try, wasn't on their radar.

[Phantasmal]

I believe I heard the same thing in 2016. Then again when the Mueller report was to be released. Sorry Phan I won't hold my breath.

Yeah, but it came true in 2018, and the Mueller report is what I’d hope. Republicans are just obstructing, again.

[christiefan915]

well then that is "prejudical" . Muller was tasked with more then going after Trump he was supposed to look at Russian collusion and meddling. He didn't. he just accepted the fact it was a Fancy Bear op. run by da Russians.

So 40 million dollars later with a scad of FBI investigators, and 2 years of disruptive the presidency and the government, and Mueller doesn't even bother to look at alternative hacked by simply interviewing Assange etc??

Mueller is a partisan hack! all he cared about was his witch hunt.

You guys act like Mueller appointed himself and set out to get vengeance against trump for some unknown reason. He was appointed, was he supposed to say "no"? He wasn't even in public service at the time; what reason would he have to turn on trump?

You guys also seem to think that without Mueller there wouldn't have been an investigation. I say if it wasn't Mueller it would have been someone else. I also think trump shot himself in the foot after he fired Comey and then announced "I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off..."

We already know about the other lies, i.e. trump saying via Sarah Slanders that "Comey had "lost the support" of "rank and file" FBI employees.."

That's a big problem with congenital liars like trump, having to remember everything they said so as not to contradict themselves in future statements. This happens a lot with trump but his supporters don't care.

[christiefan915]

he could have -nothing prevented it. Or he could have tried to get an amnesty in exchange for an interview, and possible testimony..or a phone call.. Since when do investigators sluff off their duties because they have to do more then call in witnesses?

I don't know what Mueller could or could not have done under law. Could he subpoena an Australian holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in GB? Would Assange be compelled to reply? I'm talking technical legal questions here.

[christiefan915]

Mueller could have sent somebody to get a signed affidavit and record a video interview. They didn't even try, wasn't on their radar.

Do you know that for sure? How so? What if Assange refused?

[Stretch]

https://www.fbi.gov/about/leadership...nal-operations
It was a counter intel investigation.
I imagine they could. CIA as well.

[Darth Omar]

Are you saying Mueller should have traveled to Britain and talked with Assange at the embassy?

I assumed Mullet had access to Skype capabilities lol.

My bad.

[cancel2 2022]

Do you know that for sure? How so? What if Assange refused?

I haven't seen anything about Mueller or any of his highly paid investigators contacting Assange about an interview?

[Darth Omar]

Do you know that for sure? How so? What if Assange refused?

Is Assange [the person actually responsible for disseminating the DNC/Hillary dirt] *even mentioned* in Mullet’s report?

[tsuke]

Are you saying Mueller should have traveled to Britain and talked with Assange at the embassy?

i can forgive not talking to assange but at least do your own investigation into the server with all the time and resources given to you instead of relying on a third party contracted by the dnc.

[anatta]

I don't know what Mueller could or could not have done under law. Could he subpoena an Australian holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in GB? Would Assange be compelled to reply? I'm talking technical legal questions here.

he could subpoena of course -i doubt it has any legal weight -afterall he was dodging a US indictment as well.
If I were Mueller,and wanted the truth - i would have contacted Rosenweasel for permission to waive extradition.
Or done a video interview etc

he was completely disinterested -he is a hack

[christiefan915]

I assumed Mullet had access to Skype capabilities lol.

My bad.

I'm talking about protocol, jurisdiction, whether or not Assange would do it. The US has been on his tail since 2010. A year ago there was a sealed indictment against him. Then in April of this year he was charged with a computer crime. I don't even like the guy or support what he did, but could see that he'd be unwilling to cooperate with the US about anything.

[christiefan915]

Is Assange [the person actually responsible for disseminating the DNC/Hillary dirt] *even mentioned* in Mullet’s report?

Yes he was. He was also using Seth Rich as cover.

“After the U.S. intelligence community publicly announced its assessment that Russia was behind the hacking operation, Assange continued to deny that the Clinton materials released by WikiLeaks had come from Russian hacking,” the report reads. “According to media reports, Assange told a U.S. congressman that the DNC hack was an ‘inside job,’ and purported to have ‘physical proof’ that Russians did not give materials to Assange.”

Article here.