Question for JPP impeachment enthusiasts

[Truth Detector]

I'm reading it little by little. And even though I'm far from done, what's in the report so far is a lot worse than how Barr tried to paint it.

LIE and LAME. Most of the report reads like a third grade essay project. It comes across even dumber than the juvenile questionnaire sent to Trump.

It is a costly embarrassment for this nation, but mostly for the Democratic Party of the Jackass who hinged their 2020 hopes on impeachment.

[Darth Omar]

Laughable Trumptard.

Is English your second language?

Why don’t the democrats take your 10 ‘counts’ and impeach Trump with it lol?

What does Barr have to do with it? Barr can’t keep democrats from impeaching Trump.

[Truth Detector]

I have ordered a copy, I’m waiting for it to arrive. I don’t like reading extensively on a blue screen. It does things to the eyes and brain.

Ordered a copy? It is readily available on line you moron.

[Truth Detector]

AOC is a boss bitch.

AOC is a dip shit. You're a bigger fool buying into her brain dead shtick.

[Truth Detector]

10 counts of obstruction

LIE and LAME. But your a moron who thinks that an "instance" equals "counts".

[Truth Detector]

what good are footnotes? all they would show is the sourcing for the "obstructions" I know enough how Mueller wrote up his indictments..long narratives involving the worst possible unproven scenario
( unproven but spun and the fact he didn't recommend indicting Trump is proof how he rolled).
He should not have even included that in his Witch Hunt report,anymore then Comey went and gave a bunch of stuff on Hillary and then did not indict. Both Comey and Mueller grossly violated proesecutorial ethics

Take Cohen for ex. there are 2 kind of CFR violations - one is a felony the other is a fine -
Mueller wrote it up as a "conspiracy" to defrauds by using campaign money, instead of the simpler fact Cohen recommend it be paid that way. Trump went along with his advice ( we have an audio tape of him somewhere) - and then Mueller charges him with a felony defraud instead of a technical violation..

same with Flynn -did you know the 2 agents ( and one was Perter Strzok no less) left the meeting and said Flynn appeared truthful? they filed a 302 -and them months later amended it to Flynn lying etc.

Mueller is a slippy eel. he had a bunch of Democratic zealots under him ( the lawyer for the Clinton Foundation , and of course Weissman) and a few more partisan hack - all Dems -many who contributed to Dem candidates.

Why in the world would I want to suck down that narrative of partisan poison Kool Aide?

SPOT ON!!

[Truth Detector]

trump says it completely exonerates him so I guess he doesn't think it's partisan poison.

It also raises the question why is he so bitter and vicious about Mueller if Mueller "exonerated" him?

NO CRIME = NOTHING TO EXONERATE. Liberals = Morons.

[Darth Omar]

NO CRIME = NOTHING TO EXONERATE. Liberals = Morons.

Exactly. It’s strictly an either/or proposition lol.

DOJ regulations don’t allow for public proclamations of prosecutorial gray areas LIKE WHAT GOT COMEY FIRED in the Clinton debacle.

Mullet’s ‘non-exoneration’ is non-sensical. It’s like an obstetrician telling a woman she’s ‘non-pregnant’ just so he could split the difference to keep from calling it one way or another.

It’s absurd.

[Darth Omar]

NO CRIME = NOTHING TO EXONERATE. Liberals = Morons.

Exactly. It’s strictly an either/or proposition lol.

DOJ regulations don’t allow for public proclamations of prosecutorial gray areas LIKE WHAT GOT COMEY FIRED in the Clinton debacle.

Mullet’s ‘non-exoneration’ is non-sensical. It’s like an obstetrician telling a woman she’s ‘non-pregnant’ just so he could split the difference to keep from calling it one way or another.

It’s absurd.

[domer76]

Why don’t the democrats take your 10 ‘counts’ and impeach Trump with it lol?

What does Barr have to do with it? Barr can’t keep democrats from impeaching Trump.

Why is English so difficult for you?

Where did I ever mention impeachment or Barr?

[domer76]

Exactly. It’s strictly an either/or proposition lol.

DOJ regulations don’t allow for public proclamations of prosecutorial gray areas LIKE WHAT GOT COMEY FIRED in the Clinton debacle.

Mullet’s ‘non-exoneration’ is non-sensical. It’s like an obstetrician telling a woman she’s ‘non-pregnant’ just so he could split the difference to keep from calling it one way or another.

It’s absurd.

What a stupid fucking analogy.