Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, USFREEDOM911, Truth Detector, canceled.2021.1, canceled.2021.2 and CFM


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,620
    Thanks
    65,436
    Thanked 38,186 Times in 25,721 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

    Looks like Mueller's not a happy camper about the way his report was handled.

    Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

    “The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

    ...Justice Department officials said Tuesday that they were taken aback by the tone of Mueller’s letter and that it came as a surprise to them that he had such concerns. Until they received the letter, they believed Mueller was in agreement with them on the process of reviewing the report and redacting certain types of information, a process that took several weeks. Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

    ...Mueller’s main worry was that the public was not getting an accurate understanding of the obstruction investigation, officials said."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.1a28fe163b91


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Cypress (04-30-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

    In his letter to Barr, Mueller wrote that the redaction process “need not delay release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate the misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions about the nature and outcome of our investigation.”

    When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.cf7b354cee50
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Callinectes (05-01-2019), Darth Omar (05-01-2019)

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    It was a last-minute effort by fake news WaPo to do a little gas lighting prior to the Barr interview tomorrow.
    Typical tactics...scary headline with the facts buried in the text body.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Callinectes (05-01-2019)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,620
    Thanks
    65,436
    Thanked 38,186 Times in 25,721 Posts
    Groans
    5,817
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    It was a last-minute effort by fake news WaPo to do a little gas lighting prior to the Barr interview tomorrow.
    Typical tactics...scary headline with the facts buried in the text body.
    You sound worried.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Althea (04-30-2019)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    It was a last-minute effort by fake news WaPo to do a little gas lighting prior to the Barr interview tomorrow.
    Typical tactics...scary headline with the facts buried in the text body.

    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Callinectes (05-01-2019)

  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Looks like Mueller's not a happy camper about the way his report was handled.

    Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

    “The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

    ...Justice Department officials said Tuesday that they were taken aback by the tone of Mueller’s letter and that it came as a surprise to them that he had such concerns. Until they received the letter, they believed Mueller was in agreement with them on the process of reviewing the report and redacting certain types of information, a process that took several weeks. Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

    ...Mueller’s main worry was that the public was not getting an accurate understanding of the obstruction investigation, officials said."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.1a28fe163b91
    Then Mueller should've grown a pair, and spelled it out in no uncertain terms, instead of writing a political document. I mean, the guy didn't even attempt a fair assessment of his witch hunt. Whatever. Not even a passing mention of Hillary's bought and paid for pee pee "dossier". Fuck Mueller, history will not look kindly on the traitor. If there were any justice in this world, he and his cohorts would swing from a gibbet.
    Every life matters

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    418
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 109 Times in 82 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 38 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    If true, the upcoming congressional testimony may be very revealing.

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,319
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,974 Times in 32,289 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    strange that the Washington Post didn't bother to interview Mueller over something as important as this.........I remember when there were journalists instead of leakers.........

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Stretch (04-30-2019)

  16. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!!
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    14,413
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked 7,511 Times in 4,834 Posts
    Groans
    17
    Groaned 1,798 Times in 1,605 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    strange that the Washington Post didn't bother to interview Mueller over something as important as this.........I remember when there were journalists instead of leakers.........
    Hey dumbass! Mueller is still an employee and 'special investigator lead' of the investigation. He CAN'T!

    PS His tenure is said to 'expire' in the next few days! Get his ass in front of the House Committee and SWEAR HIM IN!
    WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
    WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
    WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
    WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
    WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
    WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
    WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
    WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Centerleftfl For This Post:

    christiefan915 (04-30-2019), reagansghost (04-30-2019)

  19. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Barr probably screwed the pooch on this one, there's documentation everywhere he's been lying since day one

  20. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,645
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Looks like Mueller's not a happy camper about the way his report was handled.

    Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III wrote a letter in late March complaining to Attorney General William P. Barr that a four-page memo to Congress describing the principal conclusions of the investigation into President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s work, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

    “The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”

    ...Justice Department officials said Tuesday that they were taken aback by the tone of Mueller’s letter and that it came as a surprise to them that he had such concerns. Until they received the letter, they believed Mueller was in agreement with them on the process of reviewing the report and redacting certain types of information, a process that took several weeks. Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

    ...Mueller’s main worry was that the public was not getting an accurate understanding of the obstruction investigation, officials said."



    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.1a28fe163b91


    MISS THIS?

    " In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General's March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel's obstruction analysis," she added.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

    In his letter to Barr, Mueller wrote that the redaction process “need not delay release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate the misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions about the nature and outcome of our investigation.”

    When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.cf7b354cee50
    Barr has now been shown to have materially committed perjury while under oath to Congress.

    He's fucked.

    Fun to watch you run from that, hair on fire.

  22. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Yeah, he said the media coverage stunk.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (04-30-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. DOJ addresses reports that some on Mueller team unhappy with Barr letter
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-08-2019, 07:51 AM
  2. Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-05-2019, 06:22 AM
  3. Looks like this Trump/Barr Mueller report bullshit ain't flyin lol
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-31-2019, 05:00 PM
  4. we heard from Trump toadie Barr, now what's REALLY in Mueller's report?
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 03-25-2019, 01:29 PM
  5. Fox & Trump’s propaganda on Mueller probe.
    By Joe Capitalist in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-25-2019, 06:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •