The odds against The Donald winning are prohibitive:
President Trump called Monday night for a sweeping overhaul to an asylum system he has long said is rife with fraud -- including a new fee to process asylum applicants, and the capacity to rapidly adjudicate applicants' claims while also barring them from working in the U.S. in the meantime.
In a presidential memorandum, Trump specifically told Attorney General William Barr and acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan that the move was necessary to address a "crisis" at the border. In an article published earlier this month, The New York Times acknowledged that the humanitarian crisis of illegal immigration has hit a "breaking point."
I always had serious doubts about President Trump’s respect for the United Nations. If he is serious about taking on the United Nations he will win a second term hands down if the U.S. refuses to accept United Nations ECONOMIC REFUGEES. Trump will be the first American president in history that can win on one issue —— campaign on getting the U.N.’s hands off of our immigration laws. The president that gets the U.S. out of the United Nations will be declared president for life.
Lets look at a formidable weapon in the hands of Trump’s enemies who mean all three when they defend one. Trump’s opponents.
1. Political asylum.
2. Economic refugees
3. Illegal aliens.
Illegal aliens tie all three together. There is nothing more effective than Democrats selling their treason than wailing about their concern for THE CHILDREN. Let a congressional committee ask a Democrat witness for the time of the day and they will answer THE CHILDREN regardless of the topic.
Illegal aliens pouring through open-borders and the U.N.’s economic refugees are two major crises. Both were engineered by New World Order thinking. Both crises are approaching the unsolvable stage from the perspective of the American people. Both were set in motion to force the American people into accepting, and paying for, every immigrant and refugee as the status quo. In short: They became essential components in a well-designed incremental blueprint for giving the United Nations the authority to administer a global government.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...88#post2903288
The United Nations created economic refugees after they began dictating this country’s immigration policies; open-borders, etc. Illegal aliens and UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC REFUGEES brought in for cheap labor are absolutely necessary in order to maintain the existing wealthy parasite class.
U.N. refugees were originally called UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC REFUGEES. You will not find that definition in the media these days. Two European presidents, Miloš Zeman and Viktor Orbán, nailed it:
Milos Zeman, the Czech president, has called for hundreds of thousands of economic migrants who arrived in Europe since early last year to be deported, and claimed Muslim migrants’ culture is fundamentally incompatible with European society.
The maverick Czech leader suggested migrants could be relocated to “empty places” in north Africa or on “uninhabited Greek islands” — with Greece’s foreign debt progressively reduced in return for shouldering the cost.
He warned of a “strong connection” between the migrant influx and the “wave of jihadis” in Europe, arguing that moderate Muslims could be radicalised by extremists among them, as Germans were by the Nazis in the 1930s.
Mr Zeman’s comments echoed a similar recent call by Viktor Orban, the Hungarian prime minister, and mark a hardening of rhetoric from the EU’s two most outspokenly anti-migrant leaders that has strained relations with west European counterparts. Hungarians were poised to vote in a referendum on Sunday over being compelled to take a “quota” of migrants by the EU.
NOTE: Germany adopted Mexico’s ‘good neighbor’ migration policies —— both countries are good neighbors to invading migrants on their way to somewhere else:
Asked why Hungarians are resistant to the bloc’s forced migrant redistribution policy, Mr. Orbán asserted that, “We do not consider these people to be Muslim refugees,” but as “Muslim invaders”. Drawing attention to the fact that migrants had travelled through safe countries before heading to more prosperous parts of Europe, the prime minister added that many are “economic migrants” and not in genuine need of asylum.
“That was not a wave of refugees, that was an invasion,” Orbán told BILD, criticising Germany, “which we consider the best example of discipline and the rule of law”, for descending into “chaos and anarchy” in late September 2015 under the chancellorship of Angela Merkel by permitting mass “illegal border crossings”.
U.N. economic migrants do not have a Right —— except under non-existent International law —— to invade another country’s sovereign territory at will against the laws of that country and demand to be embraced with open arms. Moreover, every country has the right to carefully vet asylum-seekers before they are admitted:
Last Monday, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention claimed in its panel of “experts” report that the United States is violating international law by virtue of its widespread detention of would-be immigrants including asylum-seekers. “The Working Group is of the view that all administrative detention, in particular of immigrants in an irregular situation, should be in accordance with international human rights law; and that such detention is to be a measure of last resort, necessary and proportionate and be not punitive in nature, and that alternatives to detention are to be sought whenever possible,” the report said.
Although the report was based on the panel’s observations during a visit to the United States last fall at the invitation of the Obama administration, the “experts” were especially critical of President Trump’s executive order in January and an implementing memorandum that “lay the groundwork for expanding the existing detention system by increasing the number of individuals subject to immigration detention.” They objected to steps under consideration by the Department of Homeland Security to further “deter illegal immigration from Mexico.”
XXXXX
The United Nations is an organization of sovereign countries according to its Charter, not a sovereign entity unto itself as its bureaucrats and globalist supporters would prefer. The U.S. Constitution protects Americans from having their core liberties as a free sovereign people undermined by a vague global governance “value system” as determined by a gaggle of unelected, unaccountable UN “experts.” That would include the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, whose budget requires some serious trimming.
NOTE: The United Nations decriminalized illegal immigration:
Breitbart London reported Thursday on EU migration commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos’s announcement that it would be “unacceptable” for any European nation to refuse the resettlement of third world asylum seekers, declaring that mass migration from Africa and the Middle East is part of the “principles and values” on which the bloc was built.
“Other countries . . .” is doublespeak for the United States:
“We need to work more with Europe, and other countries that receive refugees, to make reception systems more effective for larger numbers than before,” he said, lamenting that migrant reception systems in the bloc had “cracked under the pressure” of huge inflows.
Principles and values are the “principles and values” of the New World Order crowd. In short: United Nations “principles and values” is a catchphrase invented to impose the U.N.’s humanitarian tax dollar scam on the world.
Indeed, United Nations Refugees are economic refugees —— economic for churches and tax dollar hustlers irrespective of the First Amendment.
I do not know if European countries have any illegal aliens as they were defined before the U.N. abolished national borders. So I want to compare the cost of United Nations refugees in Europe to the cost of illegal aliens in this country:
(Washington, D.C.) - Illegal immigration to the U.S. costs federal, state and local taxpayers a staggering net cost of $116 billion a year - an increase of some $16 billion compared to previous estimates - according to a new study released by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). The study is the most comprehensive to date on the cost to federal, state and local taxpayers of the nation's 12.5 million illegal immigrants and their 4.2 million citizen children.
I can only guess at combining the cost of our illegal aliens with United Nations refugees in this country. One thing is certain, in the next 20 years the tax bite for economic parasites from Third World shit holes sent here by the U.N. scum bags will outspend the cost of illegal alien parasites.
The United Nations invented economic refugees after they began dictating this country’s immigration policies; open-borders, etc. The entire “refugee industry” as it operates today has to be shut down if there is any hope of sending the United Nations to history’s scrap heap.
Political asylum
Parenthetically, Socialists posing as Democrats did not consider it political asylum when millions and millions are slaughtered by Communists regimes. Democrats simply do not understand why anyone would run away from Communism. Today’s Democrats running for office are demanding that President Trump grant political asylum to everybody that gets here thru open-borders.
Question: Where were Vietnam War Democrats —— Joe Biden is one —— when South Vietnam refugees were fleeing for their lives to get away from Communist butchers?
A little background
1945: President Truman and WWII refugees.
On 22 December 1945, President Harry S. Truman directed that 40,000 refugees be admitted and charged against national origins quotas, in the future if necessary.
1951: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. However, the organization was only intended to operate for 3 years, from January 1951, due to the disagreement of many UN member states over the implications of a permanent body.
Go to this link to learn how insidious one of the U.N.’s foulest agencies really is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_High_Commissioner_for_Refugees
Moreover, the newly formed United Nations also played a growing role in settling refugees. Building upon the work of the League of Nations, the United Nations emerged as the most important international agency coping with refugees when it created the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and adopted the Convention on Refugees in 1951. The United States supported the UNHCR financially and eventually accepted the convention's statement as its own. While more than three million refugees settled in the United States from 1945 to 2000, American support of the UNHCR was based on the belief that most refugees wanted to return home when conditions permitted and not necessarily immigrate to the United States. [Returning to their homelands was always a propaganda lie,]
https://www.americanforeignrelations...-cold-war.html
1950 - 1954 Today’s mass migrations began slowly when illegal aliens passed themselves off as Puerto Ricans. The Tootsie Roll Company hired AMERICAN CITIZEN Puerto Ricans to work in their plant in Hoboken, New Jersey. Illegal aliens from Central America saw an opening to come here without fear of deportation. Nobody challenged them when they claimed they were American Puerto Ricans. If they spoke Spanish they were Puerto Rican.
NOTE: Tootsie Roll closed its Hoboken plant in the early 1950s and moved south leaving the American Puerto Rican workforce behind. Before moving south the “Puerto Rican” ploy was successfully exploited by illegals. Hudson County, New Jersey, and NYC, became magnets for waves of illegal aliens from Latin America claiming they were Puerto Rican because they spoke Spanish. Nobody checked.
Regardless of origin, today’s illegal aliens do not bother lying about where they were born. Indeed, they openly demand citizenship Rights and more welfare state programs.
1965: Senator Ted Kennedy’s Immigration Act turned immigration into an affirmative action program based on racial preferences. From the day LBJ began his losing war on poverty, Democrats told every legal and illegal immigrant the welfare state would take care of them if they vote for Democrats.
Refugee Act of 1980 was passed unanimously by that nest of traitors in the U.S. Senate in late 1979. It was signed by Jimmy Carter in early 1980. The Refugee Act of 1980 amended the earlier Immigration and Nationality Act and the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act. To let anything stand that Carter signed is the same as handing our sovereignty to the United Nations.
1986: President Reagan signs first amnesty bill.
Recently the liberal media has been pushing its pro-amnesty agenda by painting a false picture of Reagan on immigration and amnesty. Reagan saw that illegal immigration was becoming a big problem and wanted to stop it. He was persuaded to allow a relatively small amnesty as a bargaining chip to strengthen border security, and more importantly, workplace enforcement. Reagan wanted to fine employers $3,000 to $10,000 for each illegal immigrant deliberately hired. Congress betrayed him on the enforcement measures and probably the extent and eventual costs of the amnesty. Blindness to likely consequences and costs of social legislation seems to be an inherent characteristic of liberal politicians of both major parties. One of the great shortcomings of progressives is their inability to progress to step 2 or 3 in thinking through the logical consequences of legislation. They have an unshakeable faith in the wisdom of the latest poll of uninformed voters. Reagan should have known better than to trust the happy-clappy liberals and servants of the big dollar lobbyists. He made a big mistake, but he admitted it.
Ronald Reagan was not comfortable with amnesty. He was pro-enforcement, and he admitted to Edwin Meese that the biggest mistake of his presidency was to sign the 1986 amnesty. We should learn from the wisdom Reagan gained by bitter experience. Any amnesty is a slippery slope to national economic and social disaster.
1990: The Immigration Act signed by a New World Oder president:
President George H.W. Bush hands a pen to Attorney General Dick Thornburgh after signing immigration legislation Nov. 29, 1990. Next to Thornburgh (from left): Sen. Alan Simpson, Rep. Bruce Morrison, Sen. Ted Kennedy and Sen. Paul Simon. | Marcy Nighswander/AP Photo
Enacted on November 29, 1990, the Immigration Act of 1990 was an amendment in United States immigration law that increased the number of legal immigrants that entered into the United States every year. In addition, the the amendment introduced a "lottery" system which assigned visas to immigrants randomly. The main reason for this was to change previous United States immigration law that prohibited the granting of visas to immigrants from certain countries. Other immigration law changes that were included in the act was a stipulation that prevented immigrants from entering the United States because of their homosexuality. Another restriction that was lifted as a result of the enacted United States immigration law was restrictions against immigrants that are HIV-positive.
https://immigration.laws.com/immigration-act-of-1990
1999: Democrats, RINO, and the New World Order crowd tearing down America’s borders with TPS predated Obama’s invasion of children:
Temporary protection for foreigners in distress has figured prominently in discussions of immigration policy for some time. Hondurans, Kosovar Albanians, and Colombians are only the most recent groups considered for some kind of limited safe haven. Temporary protection amounts to a limited grant of refugee status, offering foreigners who would not otherwise be allowed to remain in the United States limited sanctuary until an emergency (civil war, widespread violence, or natural disaster) in their home country passes. For the most part, temporary protection has been offered to aliens already in the United States, usually illegally, who do not qualify for asylum but whom we are unwilling to deport.
As attractive as temporary protection seems on the surface, there is an enormous, and unbridgeable, gap between the theory and the reality. Forty years of experience have shown that "temporary" protection almost always results in permanent settlement. Whatever the theoretical benefits of temporary protection, it is clear that in the real world there is nothing as permanent as a temporary refugee.
Trump deserves a big attaboy for revoking Temporary Protected Status for immigrants. In fact, TPS should be eliminated entirely:
The Trump administration will end temporary legal immigration status for 200,000 Salvadorans who have been living in the U.S. for nearly two decades, the Department of Homeland Security announced Monday.
Salvadorans who currently have Temporary Protected Status (TPS) must return to their homeland by September 2019 or become undocumented immigrants if they remain without legal protections.
https://www.google.com/search?source....0.P4X09uHJEpk
Regardless of what it is called, the best part is that Democrats betraying the American people for United Nations ECONOMIC REFUGEES garbage are committing mass suicide.
Finally, President Trump can add Big Frank to his opponents:
p.s. I pray that President Trump is the guy I have been waiting for. I have his battle song all picked out:
Reply With Quote
Verified User
President Trump Picked A Good Fight
Originally Posted by Vasquezrocks
Truthmatters
Posting Rules
Bookmarks