Be inventive. Stop mailing in your Russobot trolling for Trump. Putin should dock your pay. 1 kopek per post is the new rate, comrad
Be inventive. Stop mailing in your Russobot trolling for Trump. Putin should dock your pay. 1 kopek per post is the new rate, comrad
Earl (04-25-2019)
So the crimes of corruption and obstruction....eliminate laws? Does avoiding criminal investigation make Hillary any less of a criminal? The law defined the crime. Thus via your logic...those laws no longer apply to anyone because Hillary evaded them through more criminal activity? I guess that's called ILLEGAL PRESCEDENT? One must remember.....why Comey declared Hillary innocent of those crimes....its not that he concluded that she did not commit the crimes.....its that HE FOUND IGNORANCE to be a valid excuse.
But "we" as constitutional conservatives already knew and comprehended that fact concerning liberals....no? LIBERALS are ignorant as hell about the US RULE OF LAW....or at least they feign ignorance as a type of valid excuse. That makes one wonder why COMEY (the wink, wink conservative) accepted ignorance as a valid reason not to recommend prosecution. Things that make you HUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!
Last edited by Ralph; 04-25-2019 at 07:27 AM.
Proving the valid point.....why make more superfluous laws NOT TO ENFORCE? Laws have no power to stop criminal activities. Laws ID the crime....nothing more. Being a criminal, undeclared or not......is a free will choice, no law can stop someone that thinks they are above the law, as you just pointed out. Its hard to win a battle of logic by prompting illogical points while contracting your own arguments.
Question? Was Al Capone any less of a criminal before he went to prison for income tax evasion? I'd wager all the dead might disagree with your circular logic/reasoning. Hillary being an UNINDICTED, UNCONVICTED MURDERER....does not make her any less of a murderer. Why? morality is not subject to legislation....it exists only in the heart. You might attempt to define it....but defining it does not invoke or eliminate it. What do all criminals have in common? They have no moral compass.....no soul, no reasoning of what is right or wrong.....all criminals are narcissistic psychopaths who believe they exist above any codes of behavior.
Last edited by Ralph; 04-25-2019 at 07:43 AM.
Legally she is not a criminal, because she was freed by criminal activity from agents working in the FBI? OK CORKY.....let's say your circular logic/reasoning really addresses the question? Why make more laws not to enforce? Have you not just validated the point that your were arguing against? You are arguing that failure to enforce equates to innocence.
Then there is the crime of attempting to change a (?) into a (.) LMAO Caught in your own circular web. If the criminals get to define law....then the world is upside down...no? Just ask Jim Comey.
Comey changed the wording....so you changing (?) into a (.)….constitutes ILLEGAL PRECEDENT. Nice try "CORKY" (Chris Burke).
SOCK PUPPET:
Last edited by Ralph; 04-25-2019 at 08:14 AM.
Phantasmal (04-25-2019)
Bookmarks