The Trump Court strikes again

[Legion]

Yes, many of them are. They rarely compensate litigants, and only serve to enrich unscrupulous law firms. If an individual has a legitimate case, they can bring suit themselves.

Indeed.

[Truth Detector]

Another one who has run out of content to rebuttal, when all they got is the personal crapola it is like the towel hitting the canvas

Next

Snowflake, you ran out of content long before this. Let me summarize the extent of your content:

[archives]

That wasn't the question, you dishonest asswhipe. What is stopping them from suing?

Lets see if we can give it to you in its simplest terms, money, the Walmarts of the world have unlimited funds for attorneys, the poor schmuck on his own, doesn't, it all comes down to the bucks, not really that difficult a concept to process

[Truth Detector]

I love it when asshats who know I have them on ignore still post to me. They know I can't see what they post, but they grovel anyhow.

It's their way of saying they're my bitch.

Fun!!!!

[Truth Detector]

Lets see if we can give it to you in its simplest terms, money, the Walmarts of the world have unlimited funds for attorneys, the poor schmuck on his own, doesn't, it all comes down to the bucks, not really that difficult a concept to process

Still can't answer the question so you deflect and flail? What is stopping them from suing?

Here's another one; what percentage do the litigants get in one of these class action cases after the Lawyers get their piece of the action? Got any idea?

[archives]

AWESOME

I don’t know the details. But if it makes you sad that is all I need

BOOM BITCHES

Didn't know facts had a personal bias innate in them, that would certainly go a long way in explaining the Trumpkin viewpoint

[Heff]

Yes, obvious you don't, read the article, and if necessary, google the case, and maybe next time you can return with relevant content, and by way, the junior high attempt at wit was corny

Your elementary school grammar and punctuation makes your writing almost unreadable.

So why was the opinion of the Supreme court wrong?

[Minister of Truth]

The last thing the current SCOTUS cares about is precedent, the Citizens United and Holder case proves that, it is all about driving a political agenda, judicial activism, the very supposed evil conservatives said they were so strongly against for decades

The CU case upheld precedent dating back to the original incorporation cases.

[archives]

Pretty damn near. The only people that make money in a class action lawsuit are the lawyers. Not the victims they supposedly represent.

You can't verify that, and class action lawsuits are pretty much the only avenue an individual has to redress grievances against a major corporation or business, the majority of successful cases against the cigarette companies were class action lawsuits

[archives]

Yes, many of them are. They rarely compensate litigants, and only serve to enrich unscrupulous law firms. If an individual has a legitimate case, they can bring suit themselves.

"they can bring suit themselves?" For real"

Individuals sued the cigarette companies dating back from the 1950's but no progress was ever made till they started filing class actions lawsuits.

Why is it so difficult for you people to understand individuals do not have the resources, meaning largely money, to take on a corporation or big business? The "Rainmaker" was a movie, not reality

[archives]

Stuck on stupid.

"truthie" is done, now it "copy and paste" would recognize the reality a whole lot of waste space and cony copy and pastes could disappear here

[archives]

Still can't answer the question so you deflect and flail? What is stopping them from suing?

Here's another one; what percentage do the litigants get in one of these class action cases after the Lawyers get their piece of the action? Got any idea?

The answer is obvious, money, let me say it again, money, unless one is stupid enough to think they are actually going to get anywhere suing a Walmart on their own. You would think a Trumpkin with his messiah's need for a personal fixer would have taught you that

Percentage, I don't know, neither do you, but class action lawsuits have been the major vehicles for successful grievances filed against the cigarette companies, auto makers, insurance companies, and others for decades

[CharacterAssassin]

The CU case upheld precedent dating back to the original incorporation cases.

Wow. You are far, far dumber than I had previously estimated. Thanks for clearing that up.

[Truth Detector]

"truthie" is done, now it "copy and paste" would recognize the reality a whole lot of waste space and cony copy and pastes could disappear here

Poor, pathetic arsecheese; he has to go through life stupid.

[Truth Detector]

The answer is obvious, money, let me say it again, money, unless one is stupid enough to think they are actually going to get anywhere suing a Walmart on their own. You would think a Trumpkin with his messiah's need for a personal fixer would have taught you that

That's a LIE and it is fucking LAME you dishonest dumb fuck. There isn't a lawyer on the planet that wouldn't take a case for no charge against a WallMart.

There aren't too many dipshits on this forum that are much dumber or dishonest.

Percentage, I don't know,

Of course you don't klnow; you're a low IQ, low information idiot whose only skill is parroting the moronic nonsense you're fed by CNN. You pathetic dumb fuck.

neither do you, but class action lawsuits have been the major vehicles for successful grievances filed against the cigarette companies, auto makers, insurance companies, and others for decades

Grow a brain:

The Class Action Racket
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...on_racket.html

One‐third (33%) of resolved cases were settled on a class basis.

— This settlement rate is half the average for federal court litigation, meaning that a class member is far less likely to have even a chance of obtaining relief than the average party suing individually.
— For those cases that do settle, there is often little or no benefit for class members.
— What is more, few class members ever even see those paltry benefits—particularly in consumer class actions. Unfortunately, because information regarding the distribution of class action settlements is rarely available, the public almost never learns what percentage of a settlement is actually paid to class members. But of the six cases in our data set for which settlement distribution data was public, five delivered funds to only minuscule percentages of the class: 0.000006%, 0.33%, 1.5%, 9.66%, and 12%. Those results are consistent with other available information about settlement distribution in consumer class actions.
— Although some cases provide for automatic distribution of benefits to class members, automatic distribution almost never is used in consumer class actions—only one of the 40 settled cases fell into this category.
— Some class actions are settled without even the potential for a monetary payment to class members, with the settlement agreement providing for payment to a charity or injunctive relief that, in virtually every case, provides no real benefit to class members.

https://www.mayerbrown.com/files/upl...assMembers.pdf