SEC CLEARANCE OFFICIAL who flagged Jared/Ivanaka & others subpoenaed, TOLD DON'T GO!

[Centerleftfl]

Remember folks, it was "unheard of" for a CIA official to weigh in on JARED's SECURITY CLEARANCE. Apparently over and above the standard "FBI background check". Trump overrode everyone and then LIED and said he had nothing to do with it. Remember that?

The LAWLESS PRESIDENT!



White House tells official not to comply with Democratic subpoena over security clearances

By Manu Raju and Sara Murray, CNN
Updated 3:02 PM ET, Tue April 23, 2019

(CNN)The White House has instructed a former official who was in charge of the security clearance process to not comply with a House subpoena demanding his appearance for an interview, the latest move by the Trump administration to thwart Democratic-led investigations into all aspects of the presidency.

After a day of tense negotiations, the White House late Monday told the former official, Carl Kline, who now works at the Defense Department, to not appear at Tuesday's deposition, contending that Democrats were seeking access to confidential information that should be off limits.

The move raises the prospect that the House Oversight Committee could seek to hold Kline in contempt, a step that Chairman Elijah Cummings warned he would take. And it's the latest White House effort to stonewall Democratic investigations, coming the same day the Trump Organization filed a lawsuit to prevent an accounting firm from complying with Cummings' subpoena for President Donald Trump's past financial records.

Michael Purpura, deputy counsel to Trump, argued that Cummings' subpoena of Kline "unconstitutionally encroaches on fundamental executive branch interests," according to a letter obtained by CNN.

Kline's attorney, Robert Driscoll, said his client would listen to his employer.

"With two masters from two equal branches of government, we will follow the instructions of the one that employs him," Driscoll said in a separate letter obtained by CNN...


https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/22/polit...ena/index.html

[Yurt]

Fake

Lafakesloozer

[cancel2 2022]

Remember folks, it was "unheard of" for a CIA official to weigh in on JARED's SECURITY CLEARANCE. Apparently over and above the standard "FBI background check". Trump did anyway and then LIED and said he had nothing to do with it. Remember that?

The LAWLESS PRESIDENT!



White House tells official not to comply with Democratic subpoena over security clearances

By Manu Raju and Sara Murray, CNN
Updated 3:02 PM ET, Tue April 23, 2019

(CNN)The White House has instructed a former official who was in charge of the security clearance process to not comply with a House subpoena demanding his appearance for an interview, the latest move by the Trump administration to thwart Democratic-led investigations into all aspects of the presidency.

After a day of tense negotiations, the White House late Monday told the former official, Carl Kline, who now works at the Defense Department, to not appear at Tuesday's deposition, contending that Democrats were seeking access to confidential information that should be off limits.

The move raises the prospect that the House Oversight Committee could seek to hold Kline in contempt, a step that Chairman Elijah Cummings warned he would take. And it's the latest White House effort to stonewall Democratic investigations, coming the same day the Trump Organization filed a lawsuit to prevent an accounting firm from complying with Cummings' subpoena for President Donald Trump's past financial records.

Michael Purpura, deputy counsel to Trump, argued that Cummings' subpoena of Kline "unconstitutionally encroaches on fundamental executive branch interests," according to a letter obtained by CNN.

Kline's attorney, Robert Driscoll, said his client would listen to his employer.

"With two masters from two equal branches of government, we will follow the instructions of the one that employs him," Driscoll said in a separate letter obtained by CNN...


https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/22/polit...ena/index.html

Have you stopped using Raw Sewage? I

[Centerleftfl]

Fake

Lafakesloozer

Fake FBI rejection or CIA weighing in?

[Centerleftfl]

Have you stopped using Raw Sewage? I

So YOU BITCH IF I DO and now you're BITCHING that I don't?

Seriously?

[Centerleftfl]

Fake

Lafakesloozer

The full scope of intelligence officials’ concerns about Mr. Kushner is not known. But the clearance had been held up in part over questions from the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. about his foreign and business contacts, including those related to Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Russia, according to multiple people familiar with the events.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/28/u...clearance.html

[Centerleftfl]

Let's NOT forget. Kelly was so exorcised about THIS one, that once Trump forced the clearance to be given, Kelly wrote 'contemporaneous notes' with detail of how it came to be. Remember?



Credit Samuel Corum for The New York Times

John F. Kelly, while he was White House chief of staff, kept contemporaneous documentation about Mr. Trump’s handling of Mr. Kushner’s security clearance, people briefed on the matter said.

[cancel2 2022]

So YOU BITCH IF I DO and now you're BITCHING that I don't?

Seriously?

CNN is almost as bad!

[marknelson5001]

Remember folks, it was "unheard of" for a CIA official to weigh in on JARED's SECURITY CLEARANCE. Apparently over and above the standard "FBI background check". Trump overrode everyone and then LIED and said he had nothing to do with it. Remember that?

The LAWLESS PRESIDENT!



White House tells official not to comply with Democratic subpoena over security clearances

By Manu Raju and Sara Murray, CNN
Updated 3:02 PM ET, Tue April 23, 2019

(CNN)The White House has instructed a former official who was in charge of the security clearance process to not comply with a House subpoena demanding his appearance for an interview, the latest move by the Trump administration to thwart Democratic-led investigations into all aspects of the presidency.

After a day of tense negotiations, the White House late Monday told the former official, Carl Kline, who now works at the Defense Department, to not appear at Tuesday's deposition, contending that Democrats were seeking access to confidential information that should be off limits.

The move raises the prospect that the House Oversight Committee could seek to hold Kline in contempt, a step that Chairman Elijah Cummings warned he would take. And it's the latest White House effort to stonewall Democratic investigations, coming the same day the Trump Organization filed a lawsuit to prevent an accounting firm from complying with Cummings' subpoena for President Donald Trump's past financial records.

Michael Purpura, deputy counsel to Trump, argued that Cummings' subpoena of Kline "unconstitutionally encroaches on fundamental executive branch interests," according to a letter obtained by CNN.

Kline's attorney, Robert Driscoll, said his client would listen to his employer.

"With two masters from two equal branches of government, we will follow the instructions of the one that employs him," Driscoll said in a separate letter obtained by CNN...


https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/22/polit...ena/index.html

So Kline will listen to the American taxpayer - cos it is the American taxpayer that pays his salary! And the majority of Americans want to know the COMPLETE TRUTH.

We are tired of republicants LYING ALL THE TIME.

[Centerleftfl]

CNN is almost as bad!

Ah yes! CNN made it ALL up. Including KELLY'S contemporaneous NOTES. CNN is part of the deep state.

Is Vlad paying for you to post? Did you get to go to Havana to see the Stones? Or are you already there?

[Getin the ring]

Ah yes! CNN made it ALL up. Including KELLY'S contemporaneous NOTES. CNN is part of the deep state.

Is Vlad paying for you to post? Did you get to go to Havana to see the Stones? Or are you already there?

so this is when you tell us why Jarod should not have a security clearance?

[Centerleftfl]

so this is when you tell us why Jarod should not have a security clearance?

How the hell would I know, dumbass, ask the CIA or FBI. THEY have his 'report'.