Originally Posted by
archives
What in the hell are you taking about?
To archives: Asshole:
Originally Posted by
Flanders
news platforms tailored for specific audiences
Try to grasp this concept. Liberals, conservatives, etc do not get face time, or articles printed, or their views peddled in opposing news outlets.
Note that Communism would not be alive today had Communist/Socialists been restricted to their megaphones
The Daily Worker was a newspaper published in New York City by the Communist Party USA, a formerly Comintern-affiliated organization. Publication began in 1924. While it generally reflected the prevailing views of the party, attempts were made to reflect a broader spectrum of left-wing opinion. At its peak, the newspaper achieved a circulation of 35,000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Worker
Also note that wherever freedom of speech does not exist, the government controls the news. The defunct Soviet Union’s Pravda was a classic example. Basically, networks and print providing the megaphone for tyrannical economic policies nurtures oppression. The welfare state thrives on authoritarian economic policies.
authoritarian (adjective)
1. Characterized by or favoring absolute obedience to authority, as against individual freedom: an authoritarian regime.
2. Of, relating to, or expecting unquestioning obedience. See synonyms at dictatorial.
authoritarian (noun)
authoritarianism (noun)
Finally, freedom of the press omits more than it prints. Take a good look at how the MSM has been blocking conservative views since 1945, while promoting big government. It is television hawking the Democrat Party’s garbage 24-7 that keeps Socialism/Communism on life support.
Originally Posted by
jimmymccready
Having to give both sides of an issue
To jimmymccready: Another asshole chimes in.
FORCING television to give both sides equal time is exactly what the Fairness Doctrine did and still does.
Originally Posted by
Flanders
I should have said ‘38=plus years’ because FOX still enforces the Fairness Doctrine:
Originally Posted by
jimmymccready
is a hallmark of a free democracy.
To jimmymccready: Free democracy is a contradiction in terms. A free people cannot have freedom and democracy at the same time.
Notice that it is filthy big government Democrat parasites who always whine “OUR” democracy is threatened.”
The best joke of the year was Nutso Nancy calling President Trump an authoritarian because he exercises his freedom of speech in tweets:
“He makes assaults on them and they strengthen him by just talking about that and that’s what an authoritarian wants you to be talking about him,” Pelosi added. “Even if they don’t like what you’re saying, if they’re talking about him, they’re not talking about us.”
Nutso is really pissed off because she cannot invoke the Fairness Doctrine and force President Trump to tweet about the parasite topics she wants him to talk about. Note that transparency was a dirty word when the Chicago sewer rat was president:
Pelosi said that time could’ve been better spent talking about health care, prescription drug prices, infrastructure, government transparency — or really, anything.
Question: How does Nutso’s media encourage Trump with all of their personal attacks?
And just for the record, you can take democracy and stick it where the sun never shines.
Bookmarks