"Furious Trump orders officials to boycott Correspondents' Dinner"

[archives]

"President Donald Trump escalated his feud with the media by another degree on Tuesday, ordering officials in his administration to boycott Saturday’s annual White House Correspondents Association dinner."

"On the same morning he reportedly issued the order, Trump unleashed a torrent of criticism against media organizations’ coverage of his presidency, calling MSNBC’s morning program “Morning Psycho (Joe)"

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...dinner-1287871
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...ondents-dinner

Another first for the Trump team, telling employees what and where they can go

Poor Donnie, he just can't handle anyone criticizing him, he's going to show them and take his ball and go home

But the bigger question is, did he also ban Fox personnel from attending?

[Superfreak]

"President Donald Trump escalated his feud with the media by another degree on Tuesday, ordering officials in his administration to boycott Saturday’s annual White House Correspondents Association dinner."

"On the same morning he reportedly issued the order, Trump unleashed a torrent of criticism against media organizations’ coverage of his presidency, calling MSNBC’s morning program “Morning Psycho (Joe)"

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...dinner-1287871
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...ondents-dinner

Another first for the Trump team, telling employees what and where they can go

Poor Donnie, he just can't handle anyone criticizing him, he's going to show them and take his ball and go home

But the bigger question is, did he also ban Fox personnel from attending?

Oh look, yet another 'unnamed source'. LMAO

[archives]

Oh look, yet another 'unnamed source'. LMAO

So you are telling us that "Politico" and "The Hill" printed an erroneous narrative?

Don't know how to tell you this but both sources are legitimate, "The Hill" actually is a conservative site, a legitimate conservative site, not the "breitfart" or "gateway" you are used to

[Superfreak]

So you are telling us that "Politico" and "The Hill" printed an erroneous narrative?

Don't know how to tell you this but both sources are legitimate, "The Hill" actually is a conservative site, a legitimate conservative site, not the "breitfart" or "gateway" you are used to

Lol... No... The Hill is a collection of authors both right and left. It is not a conservative site. What I stated is that the'source' is yet again anonymous. How many erroneous stories have been from unnamed sources? How many times will you fall for it?

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Lol... No... The Hill is a collection of authors both right and left. It is not a conservative site. What I stated is that the'source' is yet again anonymous. How many erroneous stories have been from unnamed sources? How many times will you fall for it?

The funny thing is that a lot of those stories published using anonymous sources that discussed the chaos in the White House have proven true. Mueller got the same information under oath from people working in the White House.

[Truth Detector]

The funny thing is that a lot of those stories published using anonymous sources that discussed the chaos in the White House have proven true. Mueller got the same information under oath from people working in the White House.

They aren't true you moron. There is no chaos in the Trump White House regardless of the efforts of the FAKE media to portray it as such and the morons from the Party of the Jackass to do nothing but obstruct him.

[Superfreak]

The funny thing is that a lot of those stories published using anonymous sources that discussed the chaos in the White House have proven true. Mueller got the same information under oath from people working in the White House.

Please provide examples

[archives]

Lol... No... The Hill is a collection of authors both right and left. It is not a conservative site. What I stated is that the'source' is yet again anonymous. How many erroneous stories have been from unnamed sources? How many times will you fall for it?

The "Hill" leans right just as "Politico" leans left, both have contributors from various viewpoints and both are legitimate sources, you are just used too used to the "Brietfarts" and "Gateways" to notice the difference

[Superfreak]

The "Hill" leans right just as "Politico" leans left, both have contributors from various viewpoints and both are legitimate sources, you are just used too used to the "Brietfarts" and "Gateways" to notice the difference

No, it does not. The Hill publishes all across the spectrum as it's writers are all across the spectrum. Politico is on par with Breitbart. Politico is a heavily biased source.

[Getin the ring]

So you are telling us that "Politico" and "The Hill" printed an erroneous narrative?

Don't know how to tell you this but both sources are legitimate, "The Hill" actually is a conservative site, a legitimate conservative site, not the "breitfart" or "gateway" you are used to

The only "furious" people in the room are you nut-bags and your press corp puppeteers.

Now run along and take your riddlin little man

[iolo]

The only "furious" people in the room are you nut-bags and your press corp puppeteers.

Now run along and take your riddlin little man

You seem to be a remarkably silly person. I suppose you are just a typical trumper!

[Getin the ring]

You seem to be a remarkably silly person. I suppose you are just a typical trumper!

quite remarkable, and very practical

and mostly, not likely to be triggered by things out of my control

calm reserve is what some of the greatest people in our history have relied on to weather threats to our democracy, such as the idiocy we are currently sweeping into the garbage

Da Russians !!!!!

[Truth Detector]

You I seem to be a remarkably silly stupid person. I suppose you are I am just a typical trumper asshat!

Yes, you are.

[Truth Detector]

So you are telling us that "Politico" and "The Hill" printed an erroneous narrative?

Don't know how to tell you this but both sources are legitimate, "The Hill" actually is a conservative site, a legitimate conservative site, not the "breitfart" or "gateway" you are used to

The clue for anyone with a brain that the article is stupid and biased is by reading "A FURIOUS TRUMP." Of course, you suffer from mental retardation and a severe case of TDS butt-hurt and never getting anything right, so you would fall for such dishonesty.

[archives]

The clue for anyone with a brain that the article is stupid and biased is by reading "A FURIOUS TRUMP." Of course, you suffer from mental retardation and a severe case of TDS butt-hurt and never getting anything right, so you would fall for such dishonesty.

]

What a dork, exact reason I included the same report from the "the Hill" right underneath it, always a featherweight in all these exchanges