Page 12 of 17 FirstFirst ... 28910111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 245

Thread: Mueller report concludes it was not needed to begin with

  1. #166 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,335 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    It's not puzzling at all. No one would do an examination on the actual machine that was presumed to be hacked. Doing so would risk destroying evidence. A qualified forensic examiner would use a back up and inspect that on another machine.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    Yep, that is exactly what they do.
    Priceless; stupid and stupider.

    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  2. #167 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,335 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    You are I am so fucking stupid retarded.
    Yes, you most definitely are. Along with repugnant, ugly, fat and hated by everyone with a brain.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  3. #168 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bodhisattva View Post
    you do know they are process crimes or old tax cases like Manafort? Nothing to do with obstructing the investigation or collusion
    You do know that whatever they are, there was over $30 million in fines and seizures? Idiot
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  4. #169 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    It's not puzzling at all. No one would do an examination on the actual machine that was presumed to be hacked. Doing so would risk destroying evidence. A qualified forensic examiner would use a back up and inspect that on another machine.
    Interesting assertions.

    Are you stating that the FBI doesn't know how to examine a server without destroying evidence?

  5. #170 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    You do know that whatever they are, there was over $30 million in fines and seizures? Idiot
    If collected, that would cover the cost of the witch hunt, then.

  6. #171 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    Yep, that is exactly what they do.
    Who told you that, old friend?

  7. #172 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    As early as fall 2015, the FBI supposedly detected successful efforts by "Russian hackers" to breach DEMOCRAT National Committee (DNC) computers.

    For reasons unknown, the DNC systems reportedly remained vulnerable to further "Russian" attacks.

    By 2016, the DNC and FBI both had supposedly concluded "Russians" were responsible for additional hacks.

    Yet the DNC refused to allow the FBI to examine its servers, and — for reasons unexplained — the FBI failed to confiscate them. Obviously, when national security is at stake, the FBI does not need permission to examine evidence.

    A senior law enforcement official told CNN the DNC’s withholding of crucial evidence “caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier.” https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/polit...ike/index.html

    Why didn't the FBI (then led by James Comey) act quickly and definitively to examine the evidence?

    Can any JPP DEMOCRAT explain?


    https://tinyurl.com/Answer-DEMOCRATS

  8. #173 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Who told you that, old friend?
    I read it somewhere.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  9. #174 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    If collected, that would cover the cost of the witch hunt, then.
    Yup, refuting another rake Buddhist lie.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  10. #175 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    I read it somewhere.
    OIC.

    The FBI requested, but did not receive, physical access to the DNC servers. The FBI did obtain copies of the servers and all the information on them, as well as access to forensics from CrowdStrike, a third-party cybersecurity company that reviewed the DNC servers. In testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey said that access through Crowdstrike was an "appropriate substitute" and termed the firm a "highly respected private company."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_National_Committee_email_leak

  11. #176 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    OIC.

    The FBI requested, but did not receive, physical access to the DNC servers. The FBI did obtain copies of the servers and all the information on them, as well as access to forensics from CrowdStrike, a third-party cybersecurity company that reviewed the DNC servers. In testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey said that access through Crowdstrike was an "appropriate substitute" and termed the firm a "highly respected private company."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_National_Committee_email_leak
    Glad you are honest about it.
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  12. #177 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rune View Post
    Glad you are honest about it.
    I only cited what Wiki said. I'm unaware of any compelling reason to place much credence in Comey's characterization of Crowdstrike's involvement and his blithe acceptance of their findings.

  13. #178 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    10,829
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 4,989 Times in 3,362 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 637 Times in 605 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Dear moron; she was caught with a PRIVATE e-mail server conducting the PUBLIC'S business. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)
    It seems you didn't read the Act..
    ") Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system. "

    So, it clearly wasn't a violation of the act by Clinton. It is the responsibility of the Agency to ensure preservation.

    There was classified information on that server and had been transmitted. 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment.
    And you failed to show how e and f apply.
    e requires that you show Clinton knew information was classified and transferred it to a person not authorized to receive it. There is no evidence to support either of those requirements of the law.
    f requires that you show that Clinton had lawful possession and the information be lost, stolen or destroyed or removed from it's proper place of custody or delivered to someone unauthorized to receive it.

    The problem is you can't argue that the server was unauthorized and then argue that the information on it was lawfully possessed.


    She destroyed evidence during an investigation. 44 U.S. Code § 3106 - Unlawful removal, destruction of records.
    OMG.. that is funny. You might want to read the law you referenced.

    MORON.
    Yes, that word does describe you quite well.


    You've got it ass backwards shit-for-brains; YOUR notion of the law is laughably stupid and incredibly weak.
    The law will always require evidence to prosecute. There is more evidence Trump obstructed justice than Clinton violated any of the laws you cited.
    "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

  14. #179 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
    THAT...and the fact that Mullet said he already had enough material/info gathered not just from Trump.
    Imagine that. And, just how long did Mullet have enough "juice" to not proceed with Russian collusion charges? 8 months? 15 months?
    Mullet's a snake.
    Unlike Mueller and Comey, "Bill Barr and Robert Mueller have been close friends for 30 years, from the Justice Department to family weddings and the Bible study attended by both of their wives."

    So why doesn't that fact have RWNJs showing Mueller a little more respect? You guys claimed that the so-called Mueller-Comey friendship would cause the investigation to be biased.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  15. #180 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    Obama is bad because he didn't order an investigation and Obama is bad because he did order an investigation.

    Your argument is now completely off the rails as you prove you can't think logically.
    Congress ignored the situation.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Truth Detector (04-24-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 54
    Last Post: 04-15-2019, 02:06 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-03-2019, 09:06 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-26-2019, 02:33 PM
  4. While Trump's away, 'much-needed' White House renovations begin
    By Cancel 2018.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-05-2017, 11:47 PM
  5. Report details BP's ability to deliver oil where least needed
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-07-2012, 06:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •