What If Fox News Covered Trump the Way It Covered Obama?

[Callinectes]

If it's not upside down day, you'd have 100% of the media in the bag for obama instead of 90%. If it's upside down day, well, now you got the likes of msnbc, cbs, abc and cnn on Trump's side and 10% in the bag for obama...and I'm riding my unicorn to work dressed like a woman

[StoneByStone]

If it's not upside down day, you'd have 100% of the media in the bag for obama instead of 90%. If it's upside down day, well, now you got the likes of msnbc, cbs, abc and cnn on Trump's side and 10% in the bag for obama...and I'm riding my unicorn to work dressed like a woman

Those stations don't have a liberal bias, they have a sensationalist bias, which every station has. Out of all of them, I'd say MSNBC maybe has a liberal bias. But even that is nothing compared to how extreme Fox is.

[StoneByStone]

Step 1: Radically change the rules for Trump after letting Obama and Hillary break every rule.

Did you even watch the video? Fox changed the rules for Trump, not for Obama and Hillary.

Step 2: Rush in to scream, "Whataboutism!" at anyone who points out your arbitrary, hypocritical invention of convenient new rules.

No, I'm saying "Whataboutism" because you're changing the subject to avoid acknowledging how bad Fox is. You're no different from Communists who defend the Soviet Union and Maoist China by saying that Nazis killed people.

[Callinectes]

Those stations don't have a liberal bias, they have a sensationalist bias, which every station has. Out of all of them, I'd say MSNBC maybe has a liberal bias. But even that is nothing compared to how extreme Fox is.

[StoneByStone]

Everybody knows FauxNews is infested with fake news and hypocrisy. That is, everybody with a brain.


Typical FauxNews viewers.

You know hating on rednecks is a form of racism too, right? It's one thing if it's just a joke, but I wonder if you'd roast black people like this.

[StoneByStone]

Now you're just being petty because you know you're wrong.

Yes, those stations generally have a sensationalist bias. MSNBC is the only one that can be said to have a political bias, but comparing theirs to that of Fox is silly.

If you want to be butthurt, sorry.

[artichoke]

Did you even watch the video? Fox changed the rules for Trump, not for Obama and Hillary.

Fox is insanely hostile to Trump. You are espousing old, apples-and-oranges talking points.

No, I'm saying "Whataboutism" because you're changing the subject to avoid acknowledging how bad Fox is.

And by "changing the subject," you mean, pointing out that the standard you are using is completely selective, one-sided, and bogus...hence not changing the subject at all...just pointing out that your argument is crap.

You're no different from Communists who defend the Soviet Union and Maoist China by saying that Nazis killed people.

Except no one here is changing the subject (other than you), not to mention defending genocide (I will leave that to Planned Parenthood). Other than that, your argument is totally sensible and valid.

[StoneByStone]

Fox is insanely hostile to Trump. You are espousing old, apples-and-oranges talking points.

Which talking head on Fox is hostile to Trump? From what I've seen, they're all carrying the goal posts after the Mueller Report went public.

And by "changing the subject," you mean, pointing out that the standard you are using is completely selective, one-sided, and bogus...hence not changing the subject at all...just pointing out that your argument is crap

How do you know my standards are one-sided? You're just assuming that. And you're doing it to get the subject off Trump, because you can't defend him.

Except no one here is changing the subject (other than you), not to mention defending genocide (I will leave that to Planned Parenthood). Other than that, your argument is totally sensible and valid.

What genocide have I defended?

[artichoke]

Which talking head on Fox is hostile to Trump?

All new people I've never heard of. Hired after the ownership change. Rabid never Trumpers, conspiracy theorists, and other liberal extremists.

From what I've seen, they're all carrying the goal posts after the Mueller Report went public.

Again with liberals failing to grasp the difference between opinion journalists (Hannity, Tucker, etc.) and news journalists...while accusing others of moving the goalposts while simultaneously moving the goalposts themselves from "Trump committed crimes and will go down" to "Trump is still a bad guy for fighting back against our fraudulent, illegal coup attempt."

How do you know my standards are one-sided?

Um...because they're the opposite of the standards that were applied to Obama. Obviously.

You're doing it to get the subject off Trump, because you can't defend him.

Or because the standard is a complete 180 from what was applied to Obama. Duh. That kind of makes it necessary to mention Obama.

And the defense of Trump is...Mueller's finding of "no collusion." The only person who can't defend their point here is the guy changing the subject by shouting, "Whataboutism!" every time anyone points out the BS double-standard liberals are trying to invent.

Way to think it through. LOL

What genocide have I defended?

Nobody said you defended genocide (although you probably support Planned Parenthood). That was a reference to the absurd China-Hitler comparison.

[artichoke]

Yes, those stations generally have a sensationalist bias. MSNBC is the only one that can be said to have a political bias

OMFG. You never get to talk about news media credibility ever again.

CNN is literally watched less than Spongebob at this point because it constantly reports fake news as hard fact, still mindlessly worships Obama at every turn while being openly hostile to anyone who doesn't despise Trump, encourages fascist political violence against conservative dissent, puts Democrat spin on every news story, lies to hurt conservative judges, constantly gets caught lying to hurt President Trump, stages phony news events to advance Constitution-shredding Democrat policies, pushes hysterical extremist DNC talking points instead of practicing actual journalism, and even their own people condemn them as partisan propaganda.

Seriously, lay down the crack pipe.

[Mason Michaels]

Fox is insanely hostile to Trump. You are espousing old, apples-and-oranges talking points.



And by "changing the subject," you mean, pointing out that the standard you are using is completely selective, one-sided, and bogus...hence not changing the subject at all...just pointing out that your argument is crap.



Except no one here is changing the subject (other than you), not to mention defending genocide (I will leave that to Planned Parenthood). Other than that, your argument is totally sensible and valid.

I guess you don't watch Hannity sucking Trump's dick

[Granule]

Why would fox News do something stupid like that? it's the only channel that doesn't bombard its viewers with political correctness bullshit.

Obama was half negro, and a closet Muslim. That was all the piece of shit needed to get in the White House.

[artichoke]

I guess you don't watch Hannity sucking Trump's dick

I guess liberals really aren't capable of comprehending the difference between opinion journalism and legitimate news. Rachel Maddow exists on MSNBC, therefore their news coverage must be just like her political commentary? Nice logic there, brainiac.

[Mason Michaels]

I guess liberals really aren't capable of comprehending the difference between opinion journalism and legitimate news. Rachel Maddow exists on MSNBC, therefore their news coverage must be just like her political commentary? Nice logic there, brainiac.

My post was about Hannity sucking Trumps dick.
Not Rachel Meadow.

[artichoke]

My post was about Hannity sucking Trumps dick.
Not Rachel Meadow.

I'm not saying it was about Maddow, imbecile. Try to keep up.