the "Barr" has been lowered.

[Taichiliberal]

lefties be very sad today

I wonder if those who can't think beyond the talking points and propaganda or have a rational, fact based response to information that does not concur with their beliefs rely on silly cartoons? A pity.

[Taichiliberal]

True, so open your jaundiced eyes a little. Stop ignoring the nose on your face.

Stop projecting, as it's clear you either didn't read the content of the links or are in rabid denial of them.

[countryboy]

Could this be the best response of the willfully ignorant?

What exactly is willfully ignorant, about a two-year investigation that produced absolutely nothing? Wake up and smell the Fair Trade coffee bro.

[Taichiliberal]

I must have missed your dismissals of Cartoon Ken's contribution, loser.

Babbling as usual, as you steadfastly avoid discussing content. Adios, my chuckling right wing sycophant.

[Stretch]

First, learn how to spell : C-0-L-L-U-S-I-O-N

Secondly;

Did the Trump campaign conspire with Russia?


No, the Mueller report did not find such coordination occurred, according to Barr.
Here, Barr quoted the Mueller report directly: "(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

Barr’s letter described how the special counsel’s office defined coordination, which appears to encompass a broader range of conduct than conspiracy.
"In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the special counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign ‘coordinated’ with Russian election interference activities," Barr wrote. "The special counsel defined ‘coordination’ as an ‘agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on election interference.’ "

One important caveat is that it’s not clear from Barr’s letter what level of evidence Mueller’s office considered — for instance, the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard that’s applied to criminal prosecutions, or some lower bar.

But the bottom line is Mueller’s team — according to Barr — did not find conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia in its election interference activities.

Couldn't even figure out that the word was "CONCLUSION"? I corrected it though Mr. Spellcheck.

This is the MUELLER REPORT!!!!! Not the Barr letter.

CONCLUSION regarding conspiracy and coordination with Russia, page 2 of Volume 1
https://html2-f.scribdassets.com/9nm...6071ae3bd7.jpg

***************
CONCLUSION regarding obstruction, page 182 of Volume 2
https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/9nm...786153dfcc.jpg

[Truth Detector]

I wonder if those who can't think beyond the talking points and propaganda or have a rational, fact based response to information that does not concur with their beliefs rely on silly cartoons? A pity.

Ironic post coming from one who can't think for himself or beyond the talking points and propaganda or have a rational, fact based response to information that does not concur with their beliefs rely on silly false narratives? A pity.

So what part of the Mueller report are you still struggling with understanding? It was a HOAX.

[countryboy]

Stop projecting, as it's clear you either didn't read the content of the links or are in rabid denial of them.

Lol, soooo, PolitiFact has read the entire five hundred page report in 3 hours? Didn't liberals throw a hissy fit when Barr released his summary after a short period of time?

[Taichiliberal]

What exactly is willfully ignorant, about a two-year investigation that produced absolutely nothing? Wake up and smell the Fair Trade coffee bro.

Translation: A Country Boy who either did not read the content of the links or is too afraid to discuss the content, as he has no rational, logical, fact based response that debunks the natural questions derived from them.

[Legion]

Babbling as usual, as you steadfastly avoid discussing content. Adios, my chuckling right wing sycophant.

Run and hide, loser. It's what you usually do.

[Truth Detector]

Stop projecting, as it's clear you either didn't read the content of the links or are in rabid denial of them.

IRONY from someone still bloviating stupidity that there is still something there.

[Legion]

Lol, soooo, PolitiFact has read the entire five-page report in 3 hours? Didn't liberals throw a hissy fit when Barr released his summary after a short period of time?

Careful - Chai Latte Liberal will tell you "adios."

[archives]

Here is a newsflash for you puddin. Now get ready because your mind is about to be BLOWN.

A Special Counsel is supposed to investigate CRIMES. Since as you state collusion is not a crime, why would Mueller investigate that? He investigated an actual CRIME of conspiracy.

There was none.

Now continue to keep crying for us. This is almost as enjoyable as November 2016

Incorrect, been thru this umpteen times, Mueller's top priority was to investigate Russian influence in the election, secondly,
to see if there was any coordination between the Russians and the Trump campaign, and last, to proceed ahead with any other illegalities that he may discover along the way. Read the authorizing memo, it is all there

You are partially correct, Mueller couldn't prove coordination "beyond a reasonable doubt," but he did establish that Russia did interfere and we already know that the leaders of the Trump campaign eagerly took meetings with the Russians looking for whatever help they could offer

And lastly, this is only the beginning innings, even Barr couldn't reframe some of the questionable evidence exposed, as much as the right wing media and Trump try to sell Trump's "total vindication" there is a long way to go yet

[Legion]

IRONY from someone still bloviating stupidity that there is still something there.

He has no rational, logical, fact-based response that debunks the natural conclusions derived from the Mueller report, does he, TD?

[Legion]

this is only the beginning innings, there is a long way to go yet

[Taichiliberal]

Lol, soooo, PolitiFact has read the entire five-page report in 3 hours? Didn't liberals throw a hissy fit when bar released his summary after a short period of time?

Did YOU read what was stated? Probably not, as you're just stalling. Unlike you, when someone offers a link, I read it carefully and comprehensively so I can continue the discussion in a rational, logical manner....as opposed to your dodgy smoke blowing.

And FYI: seems YOU and your like minded compadres are doing EXACTLY what you are accusing me of....taking Barr's personal opinion/synopsis of a two year report as if it's the Bible truth. You can't have it both ways, you know. My links base questions on the FACTS thus far put against Barr's statements. Deal with it.