Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Trump Takes Dividing the Nation to a New Level

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    16,205
    Thanks
    11,004
    Thanked 19,618 Times in 9,138 Posts
    Groans
    1,451
    Groaned 1,428 Times in 1,257 Posts

    Default Trump Takes Dividing the Nation to a New Level

    The president of the United States says he wants to intentionally harm Americans who didn't vote for him, for no reason other than retribution. We have never seen anything like it in our lifetimes.

    As elusive as bipartisanship might be, politicians in both parties will tell you that national unity is something we should always strive for. Particularly in a country with as much diversity as we have — not to mention one that fought a civil war — division is always a threat and a potential hindrance. Those moments when the country seemed to think and act as one, like World War II, offer lessons in what we can accomplish when we are unified.

    Which is why so many presidential candidates like to paint a picture of the unified future they can bring about, no matter how many of their predecessors failed at the attempt. Barack Obama said he wanted to unify the country, as did George W. Bush, as did Bill Clinton.

    There are complex reasons why none of them could, but we still want presidents to keep alive the hope that it might be possible. We certainly want them not to try to make our divisions worse. And most of all, we want them to act in the best interests of all Americans.

    https://prospect.org/article/trump-t...tion-new-level






  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to signalmankenneth For This Post:

    christiefan915 (04-15-2019), lisasanders1964 (04-15-2019), PoliTalker (04-15-2019), ThatOwlWoman (04-15-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    89,080
    Thanks
    147,008
    Thanked 83,429 Times in 53,293 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 4,661 Times in 4,380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    His attacks on a freshman congresswoman are the very definition of divisive rhetoric.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    signalmankenneth (04-15-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    You democrats are hysterical. Trump didn't threaten harm on those who did not vote for him.

    And a new congressman can say whatever they want but the President cannot.

    STFU snowflakes.

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,623
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 779 Times in 572 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 41 Times in 41 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by signalmankenneth View Post
    The president of the United States says he wants to intentionally harm Americans who didn't vote for him, for no reason other than retribution. We have never seen anything like it in our lifetimes.

    As elusive as bipartisanship might be, politicians in both parties will tell you that national unity is something we should always strive for. Particularly in a country with as much diversity as we have — not to mention one that fought a civil war — division is always a threat and a potential hindrance. Those moments when the country seemed to think and act as one, like World War II, offer lessons in what we can accomplish when we are unified.

    Which is why so many presidential candidates like to paint a picture of the unified future they can bring about, no matter how many of their predecessors failed at the attempt. Barack Obama said he wanted to unify the country, as did George W. Bush, as did Bill Clinton.

    There are complex reasons why none of them could, but we still want presidents to keep alive the hope that it might be possible. We certainly want them not to try to make our divisions worse. And most of all, we want them to act in the best interests of all Americans.

    https://prospect.org/article/trump-t...tion-new-level





    You're suggesting Trump has enough magical powers to divide a country with a few words. In other words, you believe in sorcery.
    The anti-Trumper's new mantra:

    “B-b-but muh White supremacy”

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,447
    Thanks
    23,965
    Thanked 19,108 Times in 13,083 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by signalmankenneth View Post
    The president of the United States says he wants to intentionally harm Americans who didn't vote for him, for no reason other than retribution. We have never seen anything like it in our lifetimes.

    As elusive as bipartisanship might be, politicians in both parties will tell you that national unity is something we should always strive for. Particularly in a country with as much diversity as we have — not to mention one that fought a civil war — division is always a threat and a potential hindrance. Those moments when the country seemed to think and act as one, like World War II, offer lessons in what we can accomplish when we are unified.

    Which is why so many presidential candidates like to paint a picture of the unified future they can bring about, no matter how many of their predecessors failed at the attempt. Barack Obama said he wanted to unify the country, as did George W. Bush, as did Bill Clinton.

    There are complex reasons why none of them could, but we still want presidents to keep alive the hope that it might be possible. We certainly want them not to try to make our divisions worse. And most of all, we want them to act in the best interests of all Americans.

    https://prospect.org/article/trump-t...tion-new-level





    Basically, President Trump just doesn't care about anything but Donald Trump. EVERYTHING else is expendable. Including national unity. He give it lip service in the big speeches like the SOTU, election day acceptance or inauguration, but his actions and divisive rhetoric do the exact opposite. Hatred is his power. Without it, he would not even be President.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PoliTalker For This Post:

    signalmankenneth (04-15-2019), ThatOwlWoman (04-15-2019)

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,326
    Thanks
    13,309
    Thanked 40,978 Times in 32,293 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    why is it Trump's fault that lib'ruls are cunts?......

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-19-2018, 05:23 AM
  2. The Dividing Line
    By Old Trapper in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-27-2018, 12:22 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-26-2016, 02:40 PM
  4. TEA party has been positive despite dividing
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-07-2010, 05:56 PM
  5. God= dividing by zero
    By tinfoil in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-20-2010, 03:53 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •