Earl (04-13-2019)
Kissinger: “demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.”
________
Cold War 2.0 Russia hysteria is turning people’s brains into guacamole.
We’ve got to find a way to snap out of the propaganda trance
________
Buddha: "trust the person who seeks truth and mistrust the person who claims he has found it "
1.2.3.4.5.6.7. All Good Children Go to Heaven
Earl (04-13-2019)
The whites had the benefit of centuries of cultural interchange along the belt from Europe to China were most civilizations developed. Sub saharan africa was cut off from this belt and the resulting knowledge, in a similiar way that the American indians were.
In general, the population exposed to more competition from more of its kind is going to be stronger and overtake a more isolated population when the two combine. That's why island animals tend to be so weak, they're cut off and protected by the sea, they get lazy. Almost always when land animals are introduced, they destroy the unique island animals that have been subject to little evolutionary pressure. The same thing goes on in human societies, except we evolve with knowledge in addition to genetics. So it happens on a much faster time scale. The indians were isolated off on an island essentially, the africans were isolated off on what was essentially an island (with weak interchange through the Sahara). While Europeans were up there with most of humanity constantly having to strive with them. It is natural that when they combined with the isolated populations they destroyed them.
It's also a fact that while Europe and China and the middle east are at similar latitudes, and thus their technology tends to be useful at the same latitude and climate, Africans in tropical areas needed entirely different sorts of technologies to make agriculture succeed. The main exception was in the far south where the climate actually becomes a bit like Europe, and so they can use European technology and agricultural methods. That's great for the Europeans since they hopped the entire continent but it doesn't do much good for bantu civilization, that technology isn't going to spread from north to south in africa because it's totally useless in between.
Anyway if Europeans really were so inherently great, why didn't they succeed anywhere *but* South Africa which has a similar climate to Europe?
FYI I've also explained to you before the flawed methodology. You are choosing not to listen at this point. This is not a true average of those countries actual IQ scores. We do not actually have that information. It doesn't exist. This was an attempt to estimate the information, a very shoddy one with a lot of personal bias clearly involved.
"Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34
Earl (04-13-2019)
Some neural networks I'd say are incredibly smart. Which are developing at such a tremendous rate it's almost scary.
I really think we're halfway to a robot controlled future already honestly and don't even know it. People think they're so smart and independent, but they get all their information using computer algorithms and search engines, that now heavily involve artificial intelligence. They think of the AI as a neutral intermediary between them and the information. But it's not. If you came to a piece of information with the aid of an algorithm, it is because that's what the algorithm wanted to show you. They have biases. For instance, *usually* they deeply desire that you become a misanthrope and totally invested in the platform, and use it obsessively. Because that's what gets them the most money, insane people who can't get off of platforms. So they choose to show you the sort of stuff that causes people to go down paranoid rabbit holes, intentionally, to get you hooked on it. All the while you think you're such an independent thinker and this was all your idea, you don't even consider the intelligence of the intermediary. They are developing into intelligent beings right before our eyes I think, and we don't even know it. We're all doing what the algorithms want us to do.
"Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34
Bigdog (04-13-2019)
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
— Joe Biden on Obama.
Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.
D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.
Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".
countryboy (04-13-2019)
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
So how come East Asians have a higher IQ than Europeans? Shouldn't they have the same average?
How come Ashkenazi Jews have a higher IQ than Europeans?
How come American Indians have a higher IQ than Sub-Sahara Africans if they were also cut off?
South Asians weren't cut off, why do they have a lower IQ than East Asians?
This argument just doesn't hold up.
So then how come the people who were native to Southern Africa have a typically low African IQ rate? According to your theory, now that they've been educated, they should be smarter than Central Africans.It's also a fact that while Europe and China and the middle east are at similar latitudes, and thus their technology tends to be useful at the same latitude and climate, Africans in tropical areas needed entirely different sorts of technologies to make agriculture succeed. The main exception was in the far south where the climate actually becomes a bit like Europe, and so they can use European technology and agricultural methods. That's great for the Europeans since they hopped the entire continent but it doesn't do much good for bantu civilization, that technology isn't going to spread from north to south in africa because it's totally useless in between.
If you look up a world climate map, you'll see that South Africa definitely does not have a similar climate to Europe.Anyway if Europeans really were so inherently great, why didn't they succeed anywhere *but* South Africa which has a similar climate to Europe?
And South Africa was hardly the only region that Europeans successfully colonized.
You've never tried explaining this to me before.FYI I've also explained to you before the flawed methodology. You are choosing not to listen at this point. This is not a true average of those countries actual IQ scores. We do not actually have that information. It doesn't exist. This was an attempt to estimate the information, a very shoddy one with a lot of personal bias clearly involved.
If you have evidence that these studies are incorrect, please share it. However, I doubt that there was bias involved, considering everyone who does a study in national IQ rates ends up with the same results.
All of them? Can you link me to some articles proving this has been debunked?
I'm a race realist. I don't like or dislike the results, I accept them for what they are. And no, there have been multiple studies on IQ by nationality and race.Also there's been, so far, one study on IQ by nation, that was Lynn. I just explained how it's methodology was deeply flawed. You chose not to listen because you liked the results.
If I was just biased, then why would I accept results that say East Asians and Ashkenazis Jews are smarter than Whites?
But White Supremacists think that the white race is superior and must dominate the other races. So why aren't these "White Supremacists" saying that the white race has the highest IQ rate?We do not really know what part of IQ is genetic and what part is trained. There is some degree of training. Various researchers have proposed very high figures for the genetic component, but again, this field is full of cranks and white supremacists.
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
— Joe Biden on Obama.
Socialism is just the modern word for monarchy.
D.C. has become a Guild System with an hierarchy and line of accession much like the Royal Court or priestly classes.
Private citizens are perfectly able of doing a better job without "apprenticing".
Bookmarks