Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Was It A Racially Motivated Crime Or Was It A Welfare State Crime?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default Was It A Racially Motivated Crime Or Was It A Welfare State Crime?

    The motive for this killing is only the first of the inevitable:



    (Alachua County Sheriff’s Office) Ezekiel Hicks, 25, was arrested on murder charges Sunday, April 7, in the death of 41-year-old Craig Brewer.


    A good Samaritan was fatally shot over the weekend while handing out $20 bills and paying for meals at a Florida restaurant, according to police.

    Police arrested Ezekiel Hicks, 25, on murder charges early Sunday in the death of 41-year-old Craig Brewer, who was shot and killed at a Waffle House, in Gainesville, Florida, just a few miles west of the University of Florida.

    Officials with the Alachua County Sheriff's Office said the restaurant's surveillance camera captured an altercation between the two on video. Witnesses said the victim was arguing with a female acquaintance of the suspect, who was reportedly upset because Brewer's generosity didn't include her.


    Waffle House good Samaritan shot to death paying for meals, handing out $20 bills
    By Karma Allen
    Apr 9, 2019 2:03 AM

    https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-killed..._headlines_hed

    I will begin with the Democrat Party’s strategy for dictating behavior —— Good Samaritan Laws.

    When the government can punish you for not supporting strangers it is only one baby step shy of abolishing every individual liberty. A country without individual liberties is the only kind of country Socialists/Communists want.

    Socialists move forward incrementally in all things. Obamacare moved into criminal law; i.e., the government punishes you for not buying health insurance. Strip away all of the doublespeak and you are left with this fact: Every law that punishes inactivity is criminal law. The shame is that there is no day in court for those who are punished for NOT doing as they are told.

    Ultimately, Good Samaritan Laws without criminal or civil penalties have no teeth. Indeed, there has never been a priest that did not dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refuse to do as they are told. American judges do it all of the time. The Socialist priesthood is very close to making the Good Samaritan dream all-inclusive for bureaucrats as well as for judges.

    Those who think Good Samaritan Laws are necessary should get their sermons in the church of their choice. In that way they can VOLUNTARILY submit to any punishment their chosen “spiritual leader” metes out. Do not force me to come along.

    Here is a brief clip from the final episode of the Jerry Seinfeld show titled The Good Samaritan:




    Make no mistake about those people written up as Socialists. When they are backed into a corner they will trigger a violent revolution in order to protect the gains they made since the late nineteenth century. Violent revolution is the only choice Socialists/Communists will have when they see their levers of power slipping away.

    Duty to Rescue Law

    What the Seinfeld gang was actually guilty of more accurately falls under what are called “Duty to Rescue laws”. These are laws that punish people who do not render aid to others when it is reasonable to do so.
    XXXXX

    There are, however, 10 states which now require that strangers notify the police anytime they are witness to a crime. Additionally, Massachusetts (where the Seinfeld troupe was nabbed), Wisconsin, Minnesota, Vermont, and Rhode Island all have laws requiring some kind of direct assistance if it is needed and reasonable, with a possible fine of up to $100 for infringement. While enforcement of these laws is reportedly rare, the fact that they exist is a powerful indicator of the potential role of government in legislating morality.

    Legality vs. Morality

    A society where complete strangers feel inspired to risk their own lives to help one another in times of need sounds almost universally appealing. However, where do we draw the limit for the law’s role in influencing morality and basic human decency? Does everyone have an intrinsic obligation to help each other, even when the situation has nothing to do with them? Or should we be free to be more selective about when we choose to get involved with others? Do charity and heroism maintain their appeal when mandated under threat of fine or imprisonment? What do you think?

    Legislating Morality: Good Samaritan and Duty to Rescue Laws
    Jeanine Leder | March 19, 2015

    https://www.idrivesafely.com/blog/good-samaritian-laws/

    Remember how the welfare state began. Look at where it is at now! Everything Good Samaritans did to this country started small. Indeed, tax dollar funded abortions and selling baby parts began with ending back ally abortions. And take a good look at the Good Samaritan garbage driving open-borders.

    Good Samaritan Laws piss into the wind. Every time priests try to legislate love it blows back in their faces.

    It has long-been my contention that parasites brought down every civilization, every empire, every culture, every prosperous country that ever was. Our federal government confirms my observation with Good Samaritan Laws.

    Finally, the biblical Good Samaritan took care of a stranger out of his own pocket, while today’s parasites demand that government Good Samaritans force everyone to “do the right thing” —— most often with tax dollars.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Put it in one sentence, Flanders.

  3. The Following User Groans At jimmymccready For This Awful Post:

    Flanders (04-09-2019)

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    Mason Michaels (04-09-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    2,267
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 360 Times in 308 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 266 Times in 232 Posts

    Default

    Just a nig robbing a man, what else is new?

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Bobb For This Post:

    Flanders (04-15-2019)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    FOX should impeach the judge:




    “Failure to do an official act” is doublespeak for the same old liberal garbage. Just like every priesthood that ever was, Socialists try to make the transition from prohibiting and punishing reprehensible behavior to telling everyone how to conduct their daily lives. Socialists can, and do, get away with abolishing private property, taxing incomes, perverting the law, betraying the country, and violating the Constitution at every turn. For all of the things Socialists in government can do they cannot govern unless they can force people to do as they are told. In short: YOU MUST NOT becomes YOU MUST.

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    It has long-been my contention that parasites brought down every civilization, every empire, every culture, every prosperous country that ever was. Our federal government confirms my observation with Good Samaritan Laws.

    Finally, the biblical Good Samaritan took care of a stranger out of his own pocket, while today’s parasites demand that government Good Samaritans force everyone to “do the right thing” —— most often with tax dollars.
    See the Eric Hoffer quote
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobb View Post
    Just a nig robbing a man, what else is new?
    Exactly and it's definitely nothing new.

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,016
    Thanks
    9,528
    Thanked 22,509 Times in 16,972 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    "Indeed, there has never been a priest that did not dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refuse to do as they are told."

    I'd say you're full of shit.

    "Every time priests try to legislate love it blows back in their faces. "

    Tell us, what do priests have to do with this asshole killing a Good Samaritan?
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready View Post
    Put it in one sentence, Flanders.
    Unable to read and understand more than a few words at a time, boy?

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Tell us, what do priests have to do with this asshole killing a Good Samaritan?
    To RB 60: I did not say they did in that instance.

    On the other hand nut cases usually kill one or two individuals. Serial killers can murder dozens before getting caught. Throughout history institutions killed thousands given the opportunity. Priests and wannabe priests recruit true believers to help with the institutional killing.

    The subject of organized religion and government killing is a different topic than my premise in this thread. Basically:

    A bullet in the back of the head would work wonders on television mouths, Socialists, lawyers, and clerics of every denomination.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...15#post3341215
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,016
    Thanks
    9,528
    Thanked 22,509 Times in 16,972 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To RB 60: I did not say they did in that instance.

    On the other hand nut cases usually kill one or two individuals. Serial killers can murder dozens before getting caught. Throughout history institutions killed thousands given the opportunity. Priests and wannabe priests recruit true believers to help with the institutional killing.

    The subject of organized religion and government killing is a different topic than my premise in this thread. Basically:

    A bullet in the back of the head would work wonders on television mouths, Socialists, lawyers, and clerics of every denomination.

    https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...15#post3341215
    Then why bring up priests? Again, isn't this thread about this asshole killing a Good Samaritan? Myself, I'd have just shot him and been done with it.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    34,321
    Thanks
    3,498
    Thanked 11,601 Times in 9,273 Posts
    Groans
    632
    Groaned 1,405 Times in 1,371 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Then why bring up priests? Again, isn't this thread about this asshole killing a Good Samaritan? Myself, I'd have just shot him and been done with it.
    Thanks for admitting you're a murderer
    AM I, I AM's,AM I.
    What day is Michaelmas on?

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 3,433 Times in 2,367 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 888 Times in 802 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Anyone who supports murder is a morally-depraved idiot.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmymccready For This Post:

    Judy Johnstone (12-04-2019)

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    3,668
    Thanks
    1,022
    Thanked 445 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 102 Times in 89 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Then why bring up priests? Again, isn't this thread about this asshole killing a Good Samaritan?
    To RB 60: I cited priests in this context to make a point about:

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    . . . Good Samaritan Laws without criminal or civil penalties have no teeth. Indeed, there has never been a priest that did not dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refuse to do as they are told. American judges do it all of the time. The Socialist priesthood is very close to making the Good Samaritan dream all-inclusive for bureaucrats as well as for judges.
    You went far astray.
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer

  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,016
    Thanks
    9,528
    Thanked 22,509 Times in 16,972 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flanders View Post
    To RB 60: I cited priests in this context to make a point about:



    You went far astray.
    I believe you went astray with the "Indeed, there has never been a priest that did not dream about punishing law-abiding citizens who refuse to do as they are told" statement.

    But I have to go, I might be back later.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-09-2019, 09:32 AM
  2. Obstruction is still a crime without an underlying crime!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-02-2018, 07:46 AM
  3. DA says murder not racially-motivated
    By Big Money in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-23-2013, 07:08 PM
  4. Louisiana: The Crime Free State!
    By Howey in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-30-2013, 06:46 PM
  5. Racially Motivated Attack on Student on Bus
    By Damocles in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 09-16-2009, 10:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •