Democrats like Nadless and Schitt claim that “collusion happened in plain sight”
Well, if that is in fact true then why do they need to see the Muller report to prove it?
They should already have everything they need
Dummycrats
If you define collusion as cooperation in working with another, the Trump campaign is certainly guilty. Among other things, the campaign's documented eager and excited desire to meet with Russians in Trump Tower shows cooperation
Now what you are going to say is that Mueller never proved that, which most likely means he didn't get any of the participants to say what happened other than the orchestrated explanation, adoptions, right, so Mueller didn't established that it was illegal, but it did occur. Collusion, cooperation, isn't solely defined in legal terms, which is what the Congressional Democrats are referring to when they say "collusion happened it plain sight," it did
cancel2 2022 (04-07-2019), Earl (04-08-2019)
Earl (04-08-2019)
[QUOTE=ziggy;2975248][video=t[/QUOTE]
Well, seeing you had to bring beer ball Brett into it;
Earl (04-08-2019)
But then isn’t the Hillary/DNC Crime Syndicate every bit as guilty of collusion as Junior was?
Given that big money was changing hands doesn’t that make their collusion more severe? As far as anyone knows Junior never offered a dime to hear what the Russian lawyer had to say. Which, as it turned out, wasn’t much.
Collusion is not a crime, but if you wanted to wring a crime out of it, I think a jury would be more impressed with money changing hands than by one party merely being ‘excited’ about the prospect of getting campaign dirt.
I don’t understand how such a glaring example of collusion can be overlooked by anyone who is concerned about collusion.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Not to make about the "whataboutism," but did the Hillary campaign pay any Russians, that is Russians, for anything? Without rehashing all the innuendos, can you establish that the DNC had any direct dealings with Russians?
You got to be really naive to think that that meeting was really about adoption, Junior got caught lying about it three separate times before admitting it occurred, but regardless, it is a direct coordination with Russians. They contacted him wanted to know if he wanted to meet and he eagerly accepted, and on top of that, got the other leadership of the campaign to meet with the Russians also
That is coordination directly with the Russians, in "plain sight"
Earl (04-08-2019)
Rune (04-08-2019)
Donald Trump on national TV, begs Russian state security services to spy on his American political opponent and hack Democratic party computers.
I cannot ever recall seeing a major American presidential candidate beg an adversarial foreign government to spy on an American political opponent.
Last edited by Darth Omar; 04-07-2019 at 03:31 PM.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Earl (04-08-2019)
This narrative that Trump was serious and it was a genuine appeal is only believed by you biased dipshits. Why do you keep repeating it? Everyone with a clear mind can see he was being facetious and sarcastic. He was making fun of the situation. It takes a real dunce to ignore the context and believe it was a real call to action. Congrats, dumbfuck, you win the prize!
Earl (04-08-2019)
Darth Omar (04-07-2019), Earl (04-08-2019)
Didn't I request without the inneundos?
If any of that was accurate why didn't all the GOP "investigations" since the elections ever prove any of it? Jordan pleaded with Sessions on live TV to open a SC on the matter and Sessions embarrassingly lecture Jordan you had to have proof
On the other hand, on a number of documented occasions a member of the Trump campaign met with Russians seeking information regarding the election, coordination in "plain site"
cancel2 2022 (04-07-2019), Earl (04-08-2019)
Bookmarks