1AM - Mueller team wrote for PUBLIC release. Actual evidence "alarming & significant"

[Getin the ring]

First nut-bag nation wanted to show, based their entire existence on Mueller finding there was "collusion"
Mueller found no collusion, now nut-bag nation still can not move on

what a waste of space your lives must be
go outside and get some fresh air

[Darth Omar]

How could President Trump obstruct an investigation into a crime that did not exist (collusion)? Of course collusion isn't a crime so the investigation was about a crime that wasn't a crime and never happened.

Mullet could go that route but it would be political toxin for House democrats to do it. A ‘non-finding’ validates Trump’s Witch Hunt rhetoric.

Particularly, if indictments against some of the actors who instigated the investigation start coming out.

But House democrats would do it anyway. They literally can’t help themselves.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Centerleftfl,

Worth a mention, WAPO didn't put this under National or Politics, they put it under National Security. That's interesting. BARR IS FUCKING WITH THE REPORT AND US!

These are some very salient 'pullouts' from the article, further down. The team WROTE IT FOR RELEASE, already 'redacted' or requiring minimum more editing.

The report was prepared “so that the front matter from each section could have
been released immediately — or very quickly,” the official said. “It was done in a way
that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”

Mueller’s team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public,
the official said, “and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words
— and not in the attorney general’s summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.”

Limited information Barr has shared about Russia investigation frustrated some on Mueller’s team

By Ellen Nakashima , Carol D. Leonnig and Rosalind S. Helderman

April 4 at 1:01 AM

Members of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team have told associates they are frustrated with the limited information Attorney General William P. Barr has provided about their nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Trump sought to obstruct justice, according to people familiar with the matter.

The displeasure among some who worked on the closely held inquiry has quietly begun to surface in the days since Barr released a four-page letter to Congress on March 24 describing what he said were the principal conclusions of Mueller’s still-confidential, 400-page report.

In his letter, Barr said that the special counsel did not establish a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. And he said that Mueller did not reach a conclusion “one way or the other” as to whether Trump’s conduct in office constituted obstruction of justice.

Absent that, Barr told lawmakers that he concluded the evidence was not sufficient to prove that the president obstructed justice.

But members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that the evidence they gathered on obstruction was alarming and significant.
“It was much more acute than Barr suggested,” said one person, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the subject’s sensitivity.


Attorney General William P. Barr has promised to provide Congress with a
redacted version of Mueller’s report by mid-April. (Erik S Lesser/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)

The New York Times first reported that some special counsel investigators feel that Barr did not adequately portray their findings.
Some members of the office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to two people familiar with their reactions.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team “There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according one U.S. official briefed on the matter...



https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.e182ad0cabfb

No big surprise.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Stretch,

Then bring your boy Mullet in for a hearing and questioning and hear it from the horse's mouth.
Get over it.

Sheesh; if you can't even get the guy's name right, what else have you twisted and misconstrued?

[jimmymccready]

The full, unredacted report will be released.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

Time to move on, for crying out loud.

You wish.

Your calls to move on before anything more is learned are nothing but you giving the President a big fat free pass.

And the same question goes to you as others:

If you can't even get Mueller's name correct, what ELSE are you getting wrong?

[PoliTalker]

Claiming that the President has an unassailable right to fire the FBI director is the same as saying it is not possible for the President to commit Obstruction of Justice.

It is tantamount to saying that anything the President does is legal simply because he is the President.

One might as well claim that the law doesn't apply to the President, that he is above the law.

[Jarod]

If it "totally exonerated" Trump you would think he would demand its full release.


Trumppers are so dumb.

[Phantasmal]

Barr is doing what he auditioned and was appointed to do, hide the report, protect the President.

[Earl]

Claiming that the President has an unassailable right to fire the FBI director is the same as saying it is not possible for the President to commit Obstruction of Justice.

It is tantamount to saying that anything the President does is legal simply because he is the President.

One might as well claim that the law doesn't apply to the President, that he is above the law.

No one claims your assertions.

The president of the United States, as the chief executive, has the Constitutional authority to hire and fire. After the FBI Director was fired, another took his place and the investigation continued. Try to get your facts straight...if you can.

[Earl]

Barr is doing what he auditioned and was appointed to do, hide the report, protect the President.

The Barr summary that was written with Mueller's help, is extant. The entire report, with redactions for national security and due process for innocents, will be released to Congress and probably to all the American people, as promised. Try to get your facts straight...if you can.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Phantasmal,

Barr is doing what he auditioned and was appointed to do, hide the report, protect the President.

He was hired to Barr Justice.

[Earl]

If it "totally exonerated" Trump you would think he would demand its full release.


Trumppers are so dumb.

He has, Snowflake:

"President Trump Supports Public Release of Mueller Report."

http://fortune.com/2019/03/20/trump-...ublic-release/

[anatta]

No one claims your assertions.

The president of the United States, as the chief executive, has the Constitutional authority to hire and fire. After the FBI Director was fired, another took his place and the investigation continued. Try to get your facts straight...if you can.

correct. POTUS plenary power to hire and fire at will. But you can see how badly Mullet wanted POTUS
( and why POTUS was wise not to testify in a perjury trap) - by refusing to simply say "no criminal evidence of obstruction" -which is all that matters

[Phantasmal]

Hello Phantasmal,



He was hired to Barr Justice.

Nice play on his name.