Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 55

Thread: Kamala Harris wants to give teachers raises .

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,291
    Thanks
    13,303
    Thanked 40,972 Times in 32,287 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    You found that in what I wrote? Fucking amazing. She is trying to back teachers and a president urging higher salaries would be quite helpful to changing wage structures.
    no, I found it in what she said.....as usual, you're pretty much irrelevant......she wants teachers to get higher salaries using federal funds.......

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,291
    Thanks
    13,303
    Thanked 40,972 Times in 32,287 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    47bpercent in Detroit with a terrible schools system is not the whole country.
    agreed......and its not the whole country's problem to solve........the federal government should not take over local schools..........the fact they keep intruding IS part of the problem.......

  3. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    How would what she proposes get her any more votes than she'd already get?
    Some greedy union teachers who are normally too lazy to vote might be swayed by her empty promises.

  4. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    If you're talking about public schools K through 8th. grade, I'd say most really are dedicated.
    That's one opinion.

  5. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    57,102
    Thanks
    25,210
    Thanked 20,648 Times in 16,578 Posts
    Groans
    129
    Groaned 1,435 Times in 1,357 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    That's one opinion.
    Most are dedicated...that's two opinions

  6. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerdberg View Post
    That is repulsive and wrong. people care a lot more about their jobs than apparently, you do. People try and do a good job. Teachers are professionals and work hard keeping up with changing teaching techniques. They require regular schooling and training. 47bpercent in Detroit with a terrible schools system is not the whole country. If you think that backs up brain dead Vasquezsucks, you are wrong. You should go back to school.
    So you say.

    The leftist Guardian relies on data that makes a mockery of your assertions.

    Spending per student exceeds the OECD average but the likes of Finland and South Korea get better results.

    the US spent an average of $16,268 a year to educate a pupil from primary through tertiary education, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) annual report of education indicators, well above the global average of $10,759.

    All that money does not appear to be translating into better results for US students. According to the National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE), the average student in Singapore is 3.5 years ahead of her US counterpart in math, 1.5 years ahead in reading and 2.5 in science. Children in countries as diverse as Canada, China, Estonia, Germany, Finland, Netherland, New Zealand and Singapore consistently outrank their US counterparts on the basics of education.


    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/07/us-education-spending-finland-south-korea


    Throwing money at the politically-powerful teachers unions doesn't appear to be producing benefits for children. Maybe that's why they oppose testing that exposes their ideology-over-education approach.

  7. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TOP View Post
    Most are dedicated...that's two opinions
    Two opinions and and a couple of bucks will get you a cup of coffee. Two opinions by themselves won't get you anything.

  8. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerdberg View Post
    A president urging higher salaries would be quite helpful to changing wage structures.
    Who told you that?

  9. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    57,102
    Thanks
    25,210
    Thanked 20,648 Times in 16,578 Posts
    Groans
    129
    Groaned 1,435 Times in 1,357 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Two opinions and and a couple of bucks will get you a cup of coffee. Two opinions by themselves won't get you anything.
    OK

  10. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,901
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,824 Times in 17,257 Posts
    Groans
    5,339
    Groaned 4,596 Times in 4,274 Posts

    Default

    Harris plan would help in teacher retention. 40 percent leave the profession within 5 years. It would encourage people to take education classes and get degrees Teacher salaries have to be competitive. Teacher salaries are at or below 2008 levels. Harris is correct.

  11. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,901
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,824 Times in 17,257 Posts
    Groans
    5,339
    Groaned 4,596 Times in 4,274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    agreed......and its not the whole country's problem to solve........the federal government should not take over local schools..........the fact they keep intruding IS part of the problem.......
    The feds should set standards for schools to achieve. You should be able to move from state to state and get a comparable education. States rights invariably result in lowering the overall quality of anything it is allowed into. Like banking. Allowing credit card companies and banks to cross lines resulting in weakening the rights of consumers across the nation. A couple states gutted usury rules and allowed banks freedom to gouge. Every bank pretended to move headquarters there so they could get the breaks and loot us all.
    We are a nation and standards should be the same across the country.

  12. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,901
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,824 Times in 17,257 Posts
    Groans
    5,339
    Groaned 4,596 Times in 4,274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    no, I found it in what she said.....as usual, you're pretty much irrelevant......she wants teachers to get higher salaries using federal funds.......
    Why does it fucking matter where the funds come from? Why is that putting a bee in your sphincter? Do rightys hate everything?

  13. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,291
    Thanks
    13,303
    Thanked 40,972 Times in 32,287 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    Why does it fucking matter where the funds come from?
    because lib'rul cunts can't keep their fucking noses out of state's rights.......

  14. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,901
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,824 Times in 17,257 Posts
    Groans
    5,339
    Groaned 4,596 Times in 4,274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    because lib'rul cunts can't keep their fucking noses out of state's rights.......
    Have someone read and explain post 41 for you. States rights is a rush to the bottom and a gift to the wealthy and corporations. YIt is sophistical. In practice, harmful to the people.

  15. The Following User Groans At Nordberg For This Awful Post:

    PostmodernProphet (04-06-2019)

  16. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,902
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,756 Times in 4,506 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    The feds should set standards for schools to achieve. You should be able to move from state to state and get a comparable education. States rights invariably result in lowering the overall quality of anything it is allowed into. Like banking. Allowing credit card companies and banks to cross lines resulting in weakening the rights of consumers across the nation. A couple states gutted usury rules and allowed banks freedom to gouge. Every bank pretended to move headquarters there so they could get the breaks and loot us all.
    We are a nation and standards should be the same across the country.
    States' rights gave us lawyers for defendants long before the Supreme Court mandated it and their decision was based partially on the fact that so many states already provided them, states' rights gave us gay marriage long before the Supreme Court mandated it and mentioned its growing acceptance among the states, states gave us legalization of marijuana while the federal government still makes it illegal and half-ass enforces the law, states' right gave us universal healthcare, states' rights gave us term limits on legislative seats, states' rights gave us public funding for elections, states' rights gave us legalized abortion long before Roe v. Wade, states' rights gave us death with dignity for the terminally ill, states' rights gave us rape shield laws, states' rights gave us shield laws protecting sources of journalists, states' right gave us laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual preference which do not exist in federal civil rights laws.......

    I am not making an argument for or against any of these policies, only arguing that states are often more progressive than the federal government and their leadership actually results in the federal government adopting these policies.

Similar Threads

  1. Kamala Harris says she wants BLACK REPARATIONS
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 148
    Last Post: 03-01-2019, 05:22 AM
  2. Kamala Harris father is pissed..lol
    By volsrock in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-20-2019, 06:07 AM
  3. Kamala Harris' 2020 Campaign
    By Bourbon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 01-24-2019, 02:30 PM
  4. Kamala Harris draws parallel between ICE and the KKK
    By dukkha in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-17-2018, 06:25 AM
  5. Is Kamala Harris Eligible to be President?
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 08-20-2018, 10:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •