Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 100

Thread: A challenge to the anti-gun crowd here. - part deux

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Yes, the Beretta M9 model should be changed to only hold ten rounds. However, it fires at a standard speed.
    And there is no reason to get triggered, we're just talking.
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    But for some reason you didn't include this "disclaimer", when you suggested it.

    Why is that?

    Maybe you didn't realize that it held 15 rounds and just FELT that it sounded good!!

    But how would changing the size of the magazine, make it "safer'??
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    You're being ridiculous now.

    Changing the size of the magazine would make it harder to kill more people on a shooting spree.
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I have something to show you, that proves you to be in error; but I would rather see how you FEEL it would make it harder.
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Isn't it obvious?

    Do you really FEEL I need to go into details?
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    You may think it's obvious; but please, go into detail why you think it's going to make it harder.

    Unless you're not confident to defend your assertion(s).
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Bullets are needed to kill people. A gun with less bullets can kill less people. Having to reload will literally save lives.

    By the way, your signature really undercuts your argument.
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Now that you've expressed your opinion, may I prove you to be in error or will you just deny it and make excuses; because I have information that will refute your conclusion?
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    You have information that disproves the theory that bullets are used to kill people? Or that reload times are real?
    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    The bullet "theory" is something that I never address.

    This was about you saying that restricting guns to 10 round magazines, will cause less people to die.

    Are you willing to stay on tangent or do you now intend to move the discussion; because I have irrefutable information that will show you're in error, regarding magazine size.
    Since you're now on; are you willing to watch a video that will refute your claim and then admit you were in error or will just continue to refuse to acknowledge fact(s)??
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    **
    Stone you're a liar and what's worse, you're a coward.

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    **
    I know you're getting the "Quote" notice(s) and are just ignoring them, so it's either you're a coward or you have realized that your assertion is BS; which would still make you a coward, for not defending your comment(s).
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I know you're getting the "Quote" notice(s) and are just ignoring them, so it's either you're a coward or you have realized that your assertion is BS; which would still make you a coward, for not defending your comment(s).
    Do you not know how this site works? It only lists the last few quotes you get. I don't get to see all of them.

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    Since you're now on; are you willing to watch a video that will refute your claim and then admit you were in error or will just continue to refuse to acknowledge fact(s)??
    I'm not going to watch a video right now, but you can explain your theory here if you can.

  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Do you not know how this site works? It only lists the last few quotes you get. I don't get to see all of them.
    But you were aware that this discussion wasn't concluded.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  7. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    I'm not going to watch a video right now, but you can explain your theory here if you can.
    It's not a "theory" and the video completely destroys your assertion, regarding smaller magazines.

    Now I know it's around 14 minutes in length; but that's a small price to pay, for seeing FACTS instead of assumptions.

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  8. The Following User Groans At USFREEDOM911 For This Awful Post:

    JPF (04-14-2019)

  9. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    But you were aware that this discussion wasn't concluded.
    Yes, but I didn't know that you replied.

  10. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Yes, but I didn't know that you replied.
    UHHHHHHHHHHHH, did you really think that I would just blindly accept your opinion??

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  11. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    UHHHHHHHHHHHH, did you really think that I would just blindly accept your opinion??

    If you can't argue against my point without telling me to watch a video, you obviously don't understand the counter-points in that video very well.

  12. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    If you can't argue against my point without telling me to watch a video, you obviously don't understand the counter-points in that video very well.
    So you're scared to watch a video, that is going to destroy your entire stance.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  13. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    So you're scared to watch a video, that is going to destroy your entire stance.
    No, I just don't care to watch a video that I know is going to be super cringe. But I'm willing to listen to your counter-point.
    Go on, explain why shorter magazines won't cause people to have to reload more.

  14. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    No, I just don't care to watch a video that I know is going to be super cringe. But I'm willing to listen to your counter-point.
    Go on, explain why shorter magazines won't cause people to have to reload more.
    My "counter point" is that you're wrong and that you're such a chicken shit that you're scared of the truth.

    Now you're going on the "reload" road, when you first said it would save lives.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  15. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    My "counter point" is that you're wrong and that you're such a chicken shit that you're scared of the truth.

    Now you're going on the "reload" road, when you first said it would save lives.
    Yes, I said shorter magazines would force the shooter to reload more times, thus giving people extra time to escape. You have yet to argue against this point, because you can't.

  16. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Yes, I said shorter magazines would force the shooter to reload more times, thus giving people extra time to escape. You have yet to argue against this point, because you can't.
    My argument is that you're wrong,

    I can prove it; but you don't have the ability to comprehend.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


Similar Threads

  1. Another question for the anti NRA crowd
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-25-2019, 12:39 PM
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: 01-20-2019, 06:01 PM
  3. Question for the anti NRA crowd
    By canceled.2021.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 02-23-2018, 07:44 AM
  4. Woo Hoo! -= part deux
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-27-2016, 07:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •