No collusion!

[LV426]

It does not stand because it never did.

Sure it did. It stood enough to conduct an investigation by the Special Counsel.

Now the GOP is refusing to release that report, opting for a "take Barr's word for it" approach.

Barr has no credibility.

[Heff]

Sure it did. It stood enough to conduct an investigation by the Special Counsel.

Now the GOP is refusing to release that report, opting for a "take Barr's word for it" approach.

Barr has no credibility.

It stood only on lies and fabrication, and that's where it now sits.

[LV426]

It stood only on lies and fabrication, and that's where it now sits.

Not at all.

Barr's the one saying this, but refusing to release the report.

So it's "take my word for it".

Why should anyone take Barr's word on anything?

[PoliTalker]

Hello Heff,

None of which has to do with an election.

It will with the one in 2020. Republicans are usually more motivated to vote. They pretty much already turn out all the voters they can possibly muster. It's the Democrats who struggle to muster a strong turn-out.

That will change in 2020. Democrats now have a very powerful motivator to turn out to vote. I would not be surprised to see a record voter participation rate in 2020.

There is little the Republicans can do to increase voter participation. But the Democrats can and will turn out in much stronger numbers. Trump has provided them with the motivation to get out and vote.

[Truth Detector]

The rest will be given out after Trump has had the opportunity to edit it.

LIE and LAME; is that all you have left snowflake?

[Jarod]

Care to show where I've pronounced her guilty??

Probably not, HUH!!

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

Note the question mark... Interesting that you ignore the question...

[Truth Detector]

You don’t think he has it?

You do????? You think Trump can edit it too????

[Truth Detector]

That is not even close to what the report says.

The Russians employed a massive propaganda campaign to help convince dull-witted, weak-minded halfwits to vote for the Kremiln's preferred candidate, Donald Trump.

Just because Trump and Putin were clever enough to not leave a direct evidence trail connecting them, doesn't change that fact.

Congratulations on going with the guy Russia wanted in charge of America.

Do you ever wonder why they wanted him to win so badly?

No, of course you don't.

You couldn't care less as long as Trump beats the same drums you love the sound of.

You poor mentally retarded moron:

The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

[LV426]

Hello Heff,



It will with the one in 2020. Republicans are usually more motivated to vote. They pretty much already turn out all the voters they can possibly muster. It's the Democrats who struggle to muster a strong turn-out.

That will change in 2020. Democrats now have a very powerful motivator to turn out to vote. I would not be surprised to see a record voter participation rate in 2020.

There is little the Republicans can do to increase voter participation. But the Democrats can and will turn out in much stronger numbers. Trump has provided them with the motivation to get out and vote.

I believe everyone who voted for Trump in 2016 will vote for him again.

[Truth Detector]

Only part of your statement is true -- the part about Clinton not gaming the EC and losing because of it. There is well-documented proof that the Russians did interfere in the election, including hacking into DNC computers, flooding social media with anti-Clinton memes, and so on. Yep, Trump won. That doesn't change the fact that multiple investigations are now taking place regarding his tax evasion, insurance fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, and so on.

Remember Al Capone and what they hung him with.

Comey Tells Trump Russians Didn't Influence the Election

Is Comey lying?

https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/co.../14/id/764008/

[USFREEDOM911]

Note the question mark... Interesting that you ignore the question...

What's even more interesting; is that a self-proclaimed Lawyer, would willingly ignore the most important part of our laws.

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

[Heff]

Not at all.

Barr's the one saying this, but refusing to release the report.

So it's "take my word for it".

Why should anyone take Barr's word on anything?

It's not just Barr's word. He's speaking about a 3 year special investigation. he's merely summarizing the results of that investigation.

[Heff]

Hello Heff,



It will with the one in 2020. Republicans are usually more motivated to vote. They pretty much already turn out all the voters they can possibly muster. It's the Democrats who struggle to muster a strong turn-out.

That will change in 2020. Democrats now have a very powerful motivator to turn out to vote. I would not be surprised to see a record voter participation rate in 2020.

There is little the Republicans can do to increase voter participation. But the Democrats can and will turn out in much stronger numbers. Trump has provided them with the motivation to get out and vote.

I think that is fair, but I also think this entire charade will syphon voters away from the Democrats.

[Darth Omar]

OR Barr is being dishonest, which has happened before (Iran Contra).

Why not just release the full report?

An argument against it is it would allow House Democrats to cherry pick it in order to construct another conspiracy theory. Democrats aren’t acting in good faith: they want rid of Trump so bad that I’m convinced they’d sacrifice the next election to do it.

An argument in favor of releasing it is will be selectively leaked to the House Democrats and the media, anyway —kind of like what they did in order to construct the Russian conspiracy theory.

So let’s release EVERYTHING. Including all of the 302’s on Flynn, Stone and Papadopoulos and all the FISA stuff.

Let’s do this.

[Jarod]

“The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“