cancel2 2022 (03-26-2019)
Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Truth Detector, canceled.2021.1, canceled.2021.2 and CFM |
cancel2 2022 (03-26-2019)
OK! Thanks for the public service announcement USFREEDO!
And yes, you have a bitch that seems legit, and yes you are the king of whataboutisms! LOL!
But, I know you have heard of copycat crimes! It's as easy as Monkey-See/Monkey-Do!
And you know damn well the author of this thread is only banning certain members, as an effort to give you original banners of threads, a taste-of-their-own-medicine!
It's only human nature to want to toss a cow-chip right back in the face of the ones that have lobbed them towards you!
It's also human nature to say, "Two can play that game"! What's good for the goose, is good for the gander, sort of thing.
Here is my philosophy on the subject of banning members for political revenge- DON'T DO IT!
First of all, "When they go low, we get high!!.......Right?............. LOL!........................ Hey thanks Michelle! I'm stealing that one! OK?
Look we are all friends here right? (Coughing Out Loud)! And we should never ban the opposition! I mean, you'll always want to know what your adversaries are thinking!
Now everybody kiss and makeup- and don't be caught being hypocritical again!!
LOL!
.
Last edited by Adolf_Twitler; 03-26-2019 at 05:55 AM.
Hello Stretch,
All that means is they didn't think they could successfully prove it in court. Even if they have extensive evidence, they knew it would be pointless to take it to court unless they had an ironclad case. And they may have realized that the financial dirty dealings are probably going to be what really brings him down anyway.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Earl (03-26-2019)
christiefan915 (03-26-2019)
Bill (03-26-2019)
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
Trust me moonbats, if Mueller would have had obstruction on Trump he would have indicted him.
He didn't.
and how can you obstruct justice anyway when there was no crime being investigated
have we lost our way little forum cupcakes?
ahhh, sad little mommas boy has another conspiracy theory, isn't that cute
This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT
C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network
Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you
Rosenweasel himself stood by his memo for Trump to fire Comey. It's much more impactful to see Rosenweasel be the one (not Mullet) to let go of any obstruction indictment.
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
Keep spinning Christie. Keep spinning. The desperation of the left is quite amusing. So sure that your masters wouldn't lie to you again, now you find out that they duped you for the 1000th time. It must be rough parroting all of their bullshit, believing they were telling you the truth... then being betrayed by them yet again.
It sure did not.
“The report offered a mixed assessment on the question of obstruction of justice. “The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,’” Attorney General William P. Barr wrote. Mr. Barr said that he had concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to establish that the president committed obstruction of justice.
christiefan915 (03-26-2019)
No spin, idiot. The words are clear.
The report offered a mixed assessment on the question of obstruction of justice. “The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,’” Attorney General William P. Barr wrote. Mr. Barr said that he had concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to establish that the president committed obstruction of justice.
Bookmarks