Mueller: NO collusion & NO Obstruction by Trump or Trump campaign

[dukkha]

eat up you idiots!!

[dukkha]

Mueller basically says there is no conclusion (public evidence) of Obstruction -
but leaves the determination up to Barr and Rosenweasel.

Because there was no intent to collude, there was no underlying attempt (intent) at obstruction -
but Mueller left that final determination to Barr and Rosenweasel - who completely cleared Trump!

[dukkha]

and Article II would completely nullify "obstruction" unless there was a corrupt intent by Trump which never happened

[katzgar]

eat up you idiots!!

you are nothing but a premature ejaculator...LOL

[Yurt]

But Shiffty says there is plenty of evidence of collusion...

How is it he knows more than Mueller?

[archives]

Mueller basically says there is no conclusion (public evidence) of Obstruction -
but leaves the determination up to Barr and Rosenweasel.

Because there was no intent to collude, there was no underlying attempt (intent) at obstruction -
but Mueller left that final determination to Barr and Rosenweasel - who completely cleared Trump!

Also said it the report "does not conclude Trump committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him"

It was Barr that wrote the summary, Mueller wasn't even consulted, Barr that concluded that Trump didn't do anything, shocker, beginning to look an awful lot like the infamous Nunes memo

[Darth Omar]

Mueller basically says there is no conclusion (public evidence) of Obstruction -
but leaves the determination up to Barr and Rosenweasel.

Because there was no intent to collude, there was no underlying attempt (intent) at obstruction -
but Mueller left that final determination to Barr and Rosenweasel - who completely cleared Trump!

Doesn’t Rosenstein owe Trump one for not firing him on the spot over the ‘wearing a wire’ fiasco lol?

[Yurt]

you are nothing but a premature ejaculator...LOL

Mueller said no evidence of collusion or conspiracy... Are you calling Mueller a liar?

[archives]

But Shiffty says there is plenty of evidence of collusion...

How is it he knows more than Mueller?

Is, but as you should know with Comey, Barr determined there wasn't enough evidence to charge him, again, it was Barr's summary, not Muellers

[Yurt]

Also said it the report "does not conclude Trump committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him"

It was Barr that wrote the summary, Mueller wasn't even consulted, Barr that concluded that Trump didn't do anything, shocker, beginning to look an awful lot like the infamous Nunes memo

Cite

[archives]

Mueller said no evidence of collusion or conspiracy... Are you calling Mueller a liar?

Wrong, Mueller wasn't even consulted on the summary, totally Barr's interpretation

[cancel2 2022]

you are nothing but a premature ejaculator...LOL

When was the last time you jacked off, was it in this century?

[Earl]

Also said it the report "does not conclude Trump committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him"

It was Barr that wrote the summary, Mueller wasn't even consulted, Barr that concluded that Trump didn't do anything, shocker, beginning to look an awful lot like the infamous Nunes memo

LOL.

[Yurt]

Is, but as you should know with Comey, Barr determined there wasn't enough evidence to charge him, again, it was Barr's summary, not Muellers

LOL, so Barr is lying?

[dukkha]

Also said it the report "does not conclude Trump committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him"

It was Barr that wrote the summary, Mueller wasn't even consulted, Barr that concluded that Trump didn't do anything, shocker, beginning to look an awful lot like the infamous Nunes memo

Mueller completely turned over that decision to BOTH Rosenweasel and Barr - if anyone had malice towards Trump
it was Rosenweasel.
Yet both the Weasel and Barr both came to the conclusion there was no obstruction, or find any evidence of a crime.

That is 100% exoneration on both collusion and obstruction. get hip -it was always bullshit