“The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
“The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
Doesn't matter. He has been accused by several high ranking members of a congress of committing all these crimes. Why should you democrats presume him guilty when the most sacred principle of the criminal justice system says to presume innocent.
You heard of trial by public opinion? Well you guys are holding trial.
Further, The presumption applies as soon as one is accused and as I noted he has been accused by those who can convict him.
Dodo.
“The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
USFREEDOM911 (03-25-2019)
christiefan915 (03-25-2019)
The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel's office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel's obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel's final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
Bookmarks