Page 21 of 28 FirstFirst ... 11171819202122232425 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 315 of 411

Thread: Mueller: NO collusion & NO Obstruction by Trump or Trump campaign

  1. #301 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,665
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    Not a FISA warrant and not Muellers investigation
    You are changing your original claim. Liar!

  2. #302 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,665
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“

  3. #303 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post


    I’ve been down every one of those sites that you uninformed pissants will cite.

    The true burden of proof “presumes” nothing. It goes in neutral. But, for simpletons of your level, they dumb it down.
    Those with law degrees and vast knowledge of it say you're wrong dipshit. Counter the quote from Cornell/Nolo. It isn't neutral in the slightest and as the quote said, it is sacred you jackass.

  4. #304 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,665
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    Those with law degrees and vast knowledge of it say you're wrong dipshit. Counter the quote from Cornell/Nolo. It isn't neutral in the slightest and as the quote said, it is sacred you jackass.
    Liar

  5. #305 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    There was NO trial yurtsie. Stop being obtuse.
    Doesn't matter. He has been accused by several high ranking members of a congress of committing all these crimes. Why should you democrats presume him guilty when the most sacred principle of the criminal justice system says to presume innocent.

    You heard of trial by public opinion? Well you guys are holding trial.

    Further, The presumption applies as soon as one is accused and as I noted he has been accused by those who can convict him.

    Dodo.

  6. #306 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,665
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    Doesn't matter. He has been accused by several high ranking members of a congress of committing all these crimes. Why should you democrats presume him guilty when the most sacred principle of the criminal justice system says to presume innocent.

    You heard of trial by public opinion? Well you guys are holding trial.

    Further, The presumption applies as soon as one is accused and as I noted he has been accused by those who can convict him.

    Dodo.
    Liar

  7. #307 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,665
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“

  8. #308 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Liar
    Is Cornell wrong? Please, enlighten us.

  9. #309 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
    So he is presumed guilty?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Yurt For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (03-25-2019)

  11. #310 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    You are changing your original claim. Liar!
    No I am not. You're on a drunk rampage tonight. I was talking about the Mueller investigation the entire time you drunken fool.

  12. #311 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,979
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    Those with law degrees and vast knowledge of it say you're wrong dipshit. Counter the quote from Cornell/Nolo. It isn't neutral in the slightest and as the quote said, it is sacred you jackass.
    Cite me a criminal case where the verdict was “innocent” versus “not guilty”

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to domer76 For This Post:

    christiefan915 (03-25-2019)

  14. #312 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    You are changing your original claim. Liar!
    Go get my original claim.... I'll wait.

  15. #313 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
    Okay evince, settle down....

  16. #314 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    3,843
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,597 Times in 1,209 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 96 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Cite me a criminal case where the verdict was “innocent” versus “not guilty”
    Go look up the Innocence Project you retarded and illiterate fool.

    As to the original verdict, of course That is guilty or not guilty. You're running away from your pathetic attempts to diminish the presumption of innocence you sick authoritarian thug.

  17. #315 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    “The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction.“
    The Special Counsel's decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel's office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel's obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel's final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



Similar Threads

  1. Mueller Is Telling Us: He's Got Trump on Collusion
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-08-2018, 11:06 AM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-27-2018, 05:05 AM
  3. Mueller: no evidence of collusion or obstruction
    By Cancel 2018.2 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 05-10-2018, 09:44 AM
  4. Mueller Weighs Putting Off Trump Obstruction Decision
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-12-2018, 03:00 PM
  5. Will Mueller charge trump with obstruction of justice over russia?. Why not Obama?
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-16-2017, 08:11 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •