Mueller: NO collusion & NO Obstruction by Trump or Trump campaign

[christiefan915]

There is no such quote.

Yes, there is. Page 3 of Barr's letter under Obstruction of Justice. https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/24/polit...doj/index.html

[christiefan915]

Like I’ve been trying to tell you lol, there’s insufficient evidence for an obstruction charge.

That's what we're saying. Insufficient evidence but no exoneration.

[christiefan915]

Archie lied, again?

No, Earl lied.

[christiefan915]

It's all here!!

Attachment 9050

Attachment 9049

Attachment 9051

Attachment 9052

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ent-Trump.html

Yes, page 3. "...it also does not exonerate him."

[christiefan915]

The whole thing was based on collusion and conspiracy, whi h you lying Dems claimed was a fact. Now you have egg on your face and most will no longer believe your hysterical claims about Trump. Suck on that.

It was based on interference, try to be honest.

Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference With the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters

[Yurt]

Nope, not “in other words”, dumbfuck.

Once again, you fail basic English. And the concepts of law. As well as your three tard friends.

I dumbed it down as much as I could.

Once again, is Trump PRESUMED innocent?

Yes or no?

[Stretch]

Mueller did not make the decision himself on whether to prosecute the President on obstruction. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein made the determination the evidence was "not sufficient" to support prosecution.

"The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the special counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public," the letter states.
Barr wrote that no one associated with the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government, "despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.
Mueller defined coordination as an "agreement -- tacit or express -- between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference."

"In cataloguing the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice offense."

*****************

"Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein made the determination the evidence was "not sufficient" to support prosecution."

"In cataloguing the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct..."

[christiefan915]

Have you forgotten who wrote the memo to Trump that Comey be fired lol?

Could this whole charade be any more jacked-up? How can Rosenstein recommend Trump be charged with obstruction *when he wrote the fricking memo* to Trump?!

This just needs to stop right here. It’s getting ridiculous. It’s over.

Who wrote the memo, you have got to be joking. Rosenstein was used by trump and we all know it.

"The deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein, privately complained that he was ordered by president Donald Trump to write the notorious memo justifying the firing of the FBI director James Comey, according to Comey’s former deputy. Andrew McCabe writes in a new book that Rosenstein, who has publicly defended the memo, lamented that the president had directed him to rationalise Comey’s dismissal, which is now the subject of inquiries into whether Trump obstructed justice.

Rosenstein made his remarks in a private meeting at the justice department on 12 May 2017, according to McCabe’s memoir, which also accuses Trump of operating like a criminal mob boss and of unleashing a “strain of insanity” in American public life.

McCabe recalls Rosenstein being “glassy-eyed”, visibly upset and sounding emotional after coming to believe the White House was using him as a scapegoat for Comey’s dismissal.
“He said it wasn’t his idea. The president had ordered him to write the memo justifying the firing,” McCabe writes. Rosenstein said he was having trouble sleeping, McCabe writes. “There’s no one here that I can trust,” he is quoted as saying."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...iring-new-book

[Stretch]

Wouldn't matter anyway. A president can fire him.

[canceled.2021.2]

Maybe Barr will re-re-open the investigation into Crooked Hillary’s illegal server and do it right

[christiefan915]

No conviction = innocence.

There was no trial, dummy.

[Darth Omar]

That's what we're saying. Insufficient evidence but no exoneration.

If ever you are investigated for a crime and they come up with ‘insufficient evidence but not exonerated’ feel free to go on with your life lol.

Hint: the ‘insufficient evidence’ part means you’re good to go.

[christiefan915]

Lol, trump is constitutionally incapable of telling the truth.

[Stretch]

Yes, there is. Page 3 of Barr's letter under Obstruction of Justice. https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/24/polit...doj/index.html

From page 3.............

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

[Adolf_Twitler]

eat up you idiots!!

Here is what you Trump idiots should eat..................