U.S. Deserves A Leader As Good As New Zealand Prime Minister: NYT Editorial Board

[Sailor]

Really, does that mean the Third Amendment is still applicable?

As I said, no Constitutional right is absolute, never was, never has been, they all can be regulated

It could be. It is still there.

[archives]

Sure it does. It protects any hand carried weapon that the US Army has access to.

It does? So a rocket launcher is beyond any kind of regulation?

[archives]

It could be. It is still there.

No, there is no "it could be," you said nothing was ever changed, so yes or no, the Third Amendment is still applicable today?

[MAGA MAN]

Wrong, both speech and guns are currently regulated, and if isn't the misinterpretation of the Second Amendment that guarantees the right you think you have tell us exactly where does this right come from if it is not in the Constitution?

This should be interesting

Your answer is in the first three words of the Preamble.

[Sailor]

No, there is no "it could be," you said nothing was ever changed, so yes or no, the Third Amendment is still applicable today?

Yes. It never changed. Why am I explaining that to someone that professes to know the Constitution?

[MAGA MAN]

It does? So a rocket launcher is beyond any kind of regulation?

Probably not, unless the projectile wasn't explosive.

[archives]

Your answer is in the first three words of the Preamble.

"We the people?"

So "we the people" guarantees that anyone in the United States who wants to own any weapon of his choice is allowed to do so?

I'd ask for an explanation but I can't it being anymore inane that that one, "we the people," does that mean everyone in America can get free Tacos on Tuesday at Taco Bell if "we the people" demand such?

[archives]

Yes. It never changed. Why am I explaining that to someone that professes to know the Constitution?

Again, no, address the question, is the Third Amendment applicable today?

Can any officer of any branch of the service knock on your door tonight and tell you you have to house and feed three soldiers in your residence until he decides to remove them? Unless you can answer yes, it means the Third Amendment has changed, and your big Constitutional gotcha is bogus

[archives]

Probably not, unless the projectile wasn't explosive.

But can't one hand carry a rocket launcher? And you told us the Second Amendment "protects any hand carried weapon that the US Army has access to"

[Sailor]

Again, no, address the question, is the Third Amendment applicable today?

Can any officer of any branch of the service knock on your door tonight and tell you you have to house and feed three soldiers in your residence until he decides to remove them? Unless you can answer yes, it means the Third Amendment has changed, and your big Constitutional gotcha is bogus

Yes. They could per the Constitution. Now stop prancing around here Archive because you are just plain wrong. It is nothing new to you.

[Stretch]

It does? So a rocket launcher is beyond any kind of regulation?

You can own one. An RPG, right? It falls under the National Firearms Act. As long as you can get an ATF permit and pay the $200 tax. It's federally legal, but some states don't allow it.

[MAGA MAN]

"We the people?"

So "we the people" guarantees that anyone in the United States who wants to own any weapon of his choice is allowed to do so?

I'd ask for an explanation but I can't it being anymore inane that that one, "we the people," does that mean everyone in America can get free Tacos on Tuesday at Taco Bell if "we the people" demand such?

Not quite. The People have all the power, all the rights, and through the Constitution delegate limited power to the federal government. Therefore anything not delegated remains to the People.

[MAGA MAN]

But can't one hand carry a rocket launcher? And you told us the Second Amendment "protects any hand carried weapon that the US Army has access to"

The rocket launcher, yes. Not the explosive.

[leaningright]

Can I own a M-16,Bazooka?

Not easily, but many think you should be able to.

[Mason Michaels]

Not easily, but many think you should be able to.

So that's a no!So the first amendment doesn't apply to every weapon.
No one needs an assault rifle.