I have to admit I didn’t see this lie coming

[canceled.2021.2]

(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).


What is restrictive in that recital you dishonest moron?

Nice bitch slap

It is hilarious how fast and furious lefties are backtracking.

Poor bitches

[USFREEDOM911]

Are you two really this dumb or are you just feigning ignorance to support your stupid, flimsy premise?

If Trump acted dishonestly or unethically in any of his business dealings that might have been in the CIVIL COURT SYSTEM, and in being dishonest or withholding requested or required evidence or information that could have been damaging to his own case, or if he suborned perjury by someone else, etc, etc, etc, that could be considered non-criminal obstruction of justice and according to the legal precedent set by Ken Starr and the Republican House during the Clinton-Lewinski case, could be considered an impeachable offense. Especially if it involved a large amount of money or if it caused great financial harm to other people.

I'm sure you'll find some slick way to squirm, wiggle and weasel your way around reality, but that's just the way it is.

So now you're saying that "dishonest or unethical business dealings", "withholding requested or required evidence or information", and "suborning perjury by someone else" are NON-CRIMINAL and therefore can't be prosecuted for it!!

[dukkha]

First off, "Brierfart," for real?

Nadler is correct, Mueller was limited to the three conditions listed in the authorizing memo, think of Starr who in four years went from Whitewater to illicit affairs.

And rest assured, the House Democrats will continue, they can now call forward witnesses and documents that were previously restricted by the Mueller investigations. On top of that, Trump has NY, Virginia, and the DC office on his trail

first off what don't know WHAT Mueller's charter was -remember Rosenweasel expanded it on Aug 2 , 2017?
I guarantee it was more -not less expansive- but it' s a secret.
~~~

also what is this shit???

There have been obstructions of justice, whether they are —clearly, whether they are criminal obstruction is another question.

Obstruction of Justice is a CRIME.
There was either a CRIME or NO crime -not this squishy area Nadler is using to expand beyond Muellers charter.

Why even bother trying to justify Congressional Over-reach?
Just be honest "we want to kill Trump and we don't GAF how we do it" and crawl further up Trump's rectum

[dukkha]

So the question is whether or not you're being dishonest or just not intelligent enough to discern the legal difference between obstruction and criminal obstruction, and to understand that just because a particular act of obstruction might not rise to the level of a criminally prosecutable act, it could still be an impeachable offense.

WHAT???

It's either perjury, suborning perjury, or obstruction -all legal charges -or not

[dukkha]

Mueller was restricted to investigating potential criminal charges as set by his authorizing memo, and as you should know after a decade of GOP endless "investigations," Congressional Committees are performing oversight as directed by the Constitution which doesn't mean strictly criminal charges

And Mueller didn't have Trump taxes, no one does, yet

he was not restricted (unfettered) in any fashion -where do you come up with this shit?
Is this going to be the "new collusion" standard? WTF?

[Stretch]

So now you're saying that "dishonest or unethical business dealings", "withholding requested or required evidence or information", and "suborning perjury by someone else" are NON-CRIMINAL and therefore can't be prosecuted for it!!

[MAGA MAN]

Libs have terrific imaginations. So you should never be surprised at the boldness of their lies.

[canceled.2021.2]

Are you two really this dumb or are you just feigning ignorance to support your stupid, flimsy premise?

If Trump acted dishonestly or unethically in any of his business dealings that might have been in the CIVIL COURT SYSTEM, and in being dishonest or withholding requested or required evidence or information that could have been damaging to his own case, or if he suborned perjury by someone else, etc, etc, etc, that could be considered non-criminal obstruction of justice and according to the legal precedent set by Ken Starr and the Republican House during the Clinton-Lewinski case, could be considered an impeachable offense. Especially if it involved a large amount of money or if it caused great financial harm to other people.

I'm sure you'll find some slick way to squirm, wiggle and weasel your way around reality, but that's just the way it is.

I seem to recall leftists claiming that the mere act of firing Comey was obstruction. Do you forget?

[Yurt]

First off, "Brierfart," for real?

Nadler is correct, Mueller was limited to the three conditions listed in the authorizing memo, think of Starr who in four years went from Whitewater to illicit affairs.

And rest assured, the House Democrats will continue, they can now call forward witnesses and documents that were previously restricted by the Mueller investigations. On top of that, Trump has NY, Virginia, and the DC office on his trail

Total BS, he wasn't restricted. Dems have been saying that the whole time based on the wording, or any other crimes. In fact, I bet you said the same thing at some point.

[Yurt]

Mueller was restricted to investigating potential criminal charges as set by his authorizing memo, and as you should know after a decade of GOP endless "investigations," Congressional Committees are performing oversight as directed by the Constitution which doesn't mean strictly criminal charges

And Mueller didn't have Trump taxes, no one does, yet

Cite where the constitution directs oversight committees to do anything.

[Yurt]

Total BS, he wasn't restricted. Dems have been saying that the whole time based on the wording, or any other crimes. In fact, I bet you said the same thing at some point.

Yep, I was right, Archie argued to Anetta he wasn't limited :

Originally Posted by anatta View Post
because he's roaming far beyond any mandate of Collusion.
He's now looking at bank records of 10years ago..for what? Did Putin and Trump collude back then?

.....

Archie: Not true, what Mueller was assigned to investigate,

(i) any links an or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-re...67231/download

[Nomad]

Nice bitch slap

It is hilarious how fast and furious lefties are backtracking.

Poor bitches

So now you're saying that "dishonest or unethical business dealings", "withholding requested or required evidence or information", and "suborning perjury by someone else" are NON-CRIMINAL and therefore can't be prosecuted for it!!

WHAT???

It's either perjury, suborning perjury, or obstruction -all legal charges -or not

Libs have terrific imaginations. So you should never be surprised at the boldness of their lies.

I seem to recall leftists claiming that the mere act of firing Comey was obstruction. Do you forget?

To all the above quoted slack-jaws, droolers, knuckle-draggers and other assorted vermin.... there are two kinds of justice... criminal justice and civil justice.

That is why there are two separate fields of law to deal with them separately... criminal law and civil law and Criminal Lawyers and Civil Lawyers.

If an act of obstruction occurred during a court case that was a CIVIL MATTER (lawsuit), then any impropriety such as obstruction that was related to that case, would be a NON-CRIMINAL (not prosectuable by the state or federal govt or punishable by a fine or prison sentence) act and would be addressed and remedied within the civil court system.

The Repugnants claimed that Bill Clinton lied under oath in a CIVIL DEPOSITION and as such, charged in their Articles of Impeachment against him, that he had OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE. But he could not be criminally charged because it was a CIVIL MATTER.

Therefore, not all obstruction is criminal obstruction and not all matters of justice relate to criminal conduct.

Never ceases to amaze me, that you low foreheads always have to have such things explained to you like children.

[MAGA MAN]

Never ceases to amaze me, that you low foreheads always have to have such things explained to you like children.

How ironic lol

[USFREEDOM911]

To all the above quoted slack-jaws, droolers, knuckle-draggers and other assorted vermin.... there are two kinds of justice... criminal justice and civil justice.

That is why there are two separate fields of law to deal with them separately... criminal law and civil law and Criminal Lawyers and Civil Lawyers.

If an act of obstruction occurred during a court case that was a CIVIL MATTER (lawsuit), then any impropriety such as obstruction that was related to that case, would be a NON-CRIMINAL (not prosectuable by the state or federal govt or punishable by a fine or prison sentence) act and would be addressed and remedied within the civil court system.

The Repugnants claimed that Bill Clinton lied under oath in a CIVIL DEPOSITION and as such, charged in their Articles of Impeachment against him, that he had OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE. But he could not be criminally charged because it was a CIVIL MATTER.

Therefore, not all obstruction is criminal obstruction and not all matters of justice relate to criminal conduct.

Never ceases to amaze me, that you low foreheads always have to have such things explained to you like children.

So now you're saying that "dishonest or unethical business dealings", "withholding requested or required evidence or information", and "suborning perjury by someone else" are NON-CRIMINAL and therefore can't be prosecuted for it!!

[CFM]

First off, "Brierfart," for real?

Nadler is correct, Mueller was limited to the three conditions listed in the authorizing memo, think of Starr who in four years went from Whitewater to illicit affairs.

And rest assured, the House Democrats will continue, they can now call forward witnesses and documents that were previously restricted by the Mueller investigations. On top of that, Trump has NY, Virginia, and the DC office on his trail

Attacking the source because you don't like the truth invalidates your argument, boy. Grow up and become a man. The rest of us will help you along is you're willing. If not, we'll let you fall by the wayside like the rest of the bitches that wouldn't try.