Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 184

Thread: Why are Rumppers declaring no collusion?

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    No, it's a rush to judgement, no one knows what is in the Report, the number of indictments isn't the measuring stick, Starr's four year report had zero inditements, yet it didn't end when Starr delievered his report

    Which is the exact reason America will never see the Mueller Report. Starr's report was completely without redactions released to the American public, no way Trump is going to let that happen. You'd have to be totally naive not to believe the staff in the White House is currently going over the Mueller Report with a sharpie before giving it back to Barr
    ridiculous. the WH can redact only sources and methods - grand jury info etc -that's upto Barr
    Both the WH and Barr say they want to release as much as possible.

    It's a bit different procedure from Starr, because Starr reported to Congress as a SP
    but Mueller reports to Barr as a SC

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Truth Detector (03-24-2019)

  3. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vinland
    Posts
    39,851
    Thanks
    41,529
    Thanked 10,833 Times in 8,248 Posts
    Groans
    11,150
    Groaned 5,899 Times in 5,299 Posts
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Arsecheese, you are one of the most tiresome people I've ever encountered. You must be a real party pooper in real life.
    Irony
    It is the responsibility of every American citizen to own a modern military rifle.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Rune For This Post:

    domer76 (03-23-2019)

  5. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Evmetro View Post
    It has been fun watching lefties shift away from collusion, lol....
    More fun watching RWNJs claim that lefties only talked about collusion. You guys got your talking points early on and stuck to them.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Rune (03-23-2019)

  7. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CosmicRocker View Post
    ridiculous. the WH can redact only sources and methods - grand jury info etc -that's upto Barr
    Both the WH and Barr say they want to release as much as possible.

    It's a bit different procedure from Starr, because Starr reported to Congress as a SP
    but Mueller reports to Barr as a SC
    "Both the WH and Barr say they want to release as much as possible." "As much as possible" could mean none. They can say it's all classified.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  8. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    Are you actually claiming Mueller wasn't investigating collusion?
    Did you read Order 3195-2017?

    "...to insure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election..."


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Rune (03-24-2019)

  10. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,676
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    No further indictments...
    Not from Mueller... DOJ won’t indict a sitting president.

  11. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CosmicRocker View Post
    ridiculous. the WH can redact only sources and methods - grand jury info etc -that's upto Barr
    Both the WH and Barr say they want to release as much as possible.

    It's a bit different procedure from Starr, because Starr reported to Congress as a SP
    but Mueller reports to Barr as a SC
    It's "ridiculous?" "Ridiculous" to think that Barr doesn't work for Trump? "Ridiculous" to think a copy of the Mueller Report isn't already in the White House? Obvious you don't remember why Trump went off on Sessions, remember, Trump thought Sessions was suppose to have his back, “Where’s my Roy Cohn," "I don't have an Attorney General."

    And believing anything Trump says, as he actually "wants to release as much as possible" is inane, he also told America a number of times that he would love to sit down and talk to Mueller, you really don't need a list of Trump's lies to show his lack of credibility do you?

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to archives For This Post:

    christiefan915 (03-24-2019), Rune (03-24-2019)

  13. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Minister of Truth For This Post:

    BRUTALITOPS (03-23-2019)

  15. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,676
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Remember when HRC was exonerated and the Rumppers would not accept it?

    That’s the best Rumppers can hope for.

  16. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,698
    Thanks
    6,598
    Thanked 12,135 Times in 9,663 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    It's "ridiculous?" "Ridiculous" to think that Barr doesn't work for Trump? "Ridiculous" to think a copy of the Mueller Report isn't already in the White House? Obvious you don't remember why Trump went off on Sessions, remember, Trump thought Sessions was suppose to have his back, “Where’s my Roy Cohn," "I don't have an Attorney General."

    And believing anything Trump says, as he actually "wants to release as much as possible" is inane, he also told America a number of times that he would love to sit down and talk to Mueller, you really don't need a list of Trump's lies to show his lack of credibility do you?
    I hope the new order comes soon to save us from trump.

  17. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    Are you actually claiming Mueller wasn't investigating collusion?
    No where in Mueller's authorizing memo is the word "collusion" mentioned, his primary function was to investigate Russian involvement in the election, you know, what Trump used to refer to as a myth. As part of that examination he was instructed to examine if there was any coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign

    Collusion isn't even a crime, heard that from the right in the early phases of the investigation, so how could he indict anyone for something that isn't a crime?

  18. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,859
    Thanks
    13,250
    Thanked 40,795 Times in 32,158 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    No where in Mueller's authorizing memo is the word "collusion" mentioned
    perhaps that explains why we never once heard the word mentioned by the lib'rul press during the last two years.......

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Stretch (03-23-2019), Truth Detector (03-24-2019)

  20. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,676
    Thanks
    9,768
    Thanked 33,628 Times in 21,489 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,633 Times in 5,141 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Collusion may or may not have been found, I love the pre-spin!

  21. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,993
    Thanks
    12,115
    Thanked 14,177 Times in 10,395 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BillyShouldPostMore View Post
    lol. it's hilarious. I can't even comprehend this oncoming liberal meltdown. they are going to go deep into the hole on this one. I think they are going to be finally broken this time. There will be no recovery.
    How many more investigations?

    A dozen?

  22. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,993
    Thanks
    12,115
    Thanked 14,177 Times in 10,395 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BillyShouldPostMore View Post
    the entire government with a motivated prosecution investigated for 2 years and found absolutely no one to charge for colluding with russia. not some patsy, not a fall guy, not a token low level volunteer. nobody. not one person charged for colluding with russia. muh russia was fake news. trump is still your president, and he will not be impeached.
    Squawk! Is this it?
    Squawk! Process Crime!
    Squawk! Fake news!
    Squawk! Enemy of the people!
    Squawk! Uranium One!
    Squawk! No collusion!
    Squawk! Witch hunt!
    Squawk! Cabal!


  23. The Following User Says Thank You to domer76 For This Post:

    Rune (03-24-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-18-2018, 04:57 PM
  2. Rumppers on this board!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-15-2017, 06:37 PM
  3. Rumppers, why now?
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 05-11-2017, 12:41 PM
  4. Two serious questions for Rumppers...
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 05-10-2017, 08:08 AM
  5. cops declaring open season on dogs
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-25-2013, 04:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •