Darth Omar (04-09-2019), Earl (03-23-2019), Stretch (03-23-2019), USFREEDOM911 (03-24-2019)
“We continue to uncover classified information mishandled by Hillary Clinton in emails that she tried to hide or destroy. This is further evidence of the urgency for the DOJ to finally undertake a complete and legitimate criminal investigation,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Attorney General Barr should immediately order a new investigation of the Hillary Clinton email scandal.”
Still more classified emails retrieved from Hillary's stash
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 03/22/2019 @ 10:51 am
https://www.wnd.com/2019/03/still-mo...illarys-stash/
Enough was known about Hillary Clinton to nail her for treason before William Barr got Mueller’s Report:
Convicting Hillary Clinton is a slam dunk in a criminal trial if AG William Barr does his job. Clearly, Pelosi is worried about Clinton being impeached following a criminal conviction. That is the only reason Nutso Nancy will not impeach President Trump. She knows that Trump’s certain acquittal in a Senate trail would bite Hillary Clinton on the ass.
More importantly, Hillary being found guilty in a criminal court would lead to her being impeached for committing treason when she was secretary of state. I doubt if the Senate would give her jail time, but a guilty verdict guarantees she would lose her perks; pension, secret service bodyguards, etc.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...89#post2943389
William Barr knows all of Hillary’s crimes. Basically, his job is to see that she beats the rap without making the DoJ or the FBI look bad. His decades of experience in the government makes him the perfect attorney general for Hillary Clinton, but not for the America people.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...93#post2830393
Hillary Clinton dying is the only thing that will put an end to Democrats talking about Trump committing treason for the Russians. The entire witch hunt was classic Saul Alinsky: Accuse your enemies of committing your crimes. One look at media reporting about ‘no crime’ in the past two years is proof that Alinsky worked to perfection.
Bottom line: Democrats and their media stooges have no reason to protect Hillary after she departs. “No reason” is not enough to convince them to drop it.
Parenthetically, Democrats are left with the convictions of people that had nothing to do with Trump’s campaign or his victory. A few diehard media mouths will continue to rale about those convictions as proof that Trump was working for the Russians.
rale also râle (noun)
An abnormal or pathological respiratory sound.
Not one of those media mouths who lied on-camera every day for two years will be fired for lying. In fact, lying is job security for television “journalists.”
Finally, those members of Congress who repeatedly lied on television should resign as Tucker Carlson suggests.
Last edited by Flanders; 03-24-2019 at 10:36 AM.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Darth Omar (04-09-2019), Earl (03-23-2019), Stretch (03-23-2019), USFREEDOM911 (03-24-2019)
You're getting carried away! Whatever Hillary did or didn't do, it wasn't treason and it has nothing to do with Mueller's report.
You got that the wrong way round. Impeachment is the process by which a legislative body levels charges against a serving government official. Nobody can be impeached after they leave office - not even Hillary, lol.Hillary being found guilty in a criminal court would lead to her being impeached for committing treason when she was secretary of state.
Don't you think Barr has more to worry about at the moment - covering for TRUMP?William Barr knows all of Hillary’s crimes. Basically, his job is to see that she beats the rap without making the DoJ or the FBI look bad.
What would you Trump suckers do without Hillary to fall back on, eh?
Last edited by Tranquillus in Exile; 03-23-2019 at 05:15 AM.
Earl (03-24-2019)
evince (03-24-2019)
Barr will continue to authorize investigations of Trump and his supporters illegal activities.
Clinton is home free.
evince (03-24-2019)
To Tranquillus in Exile: Oh yes it was. Aside from using her email to transmit classified information, she sure as hell gave “Aid And Comfort” to Russia:
Article Three of the United States Constitution
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
This was the alibi she gave for engineering the Uranium One Deal:
The US government had to sign off first, a decision that must go through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which includes executive members of the cabinet, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, and the secretary of state.
Hillary Calls Uranium One Stories ‘Debunked’
Robert Donachie
10:20 AM 10/23/2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/23/hi...ries-debunked/
Hillary & Company always forget to mention that Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time of the sale. The others rubber stamped the Uranium One Deal at her insistence. The combined political influence of the others involved could not override Secretary Clinton even if they wanted to.
To Tranquillus in Exile: Try to get your facts straight:
Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., has suggested that Bill Clinton, though now out of office, could be impeached for his pardon of fugitive Marc Rich (although probably not for grabbing a couple of coffee tables). Can a former president be impeached?
Apparently, yes. Obviously a former president would not be subject to removal from office, but scholars say that Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution, which says that impeachment may result in “disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States,” could apply. In practical terms, an impeachment would mean Clinton could not serve in any other federal elective or appointive office. Clinton would not have automatic protection against such a proceeding because he was exercising his constitutionally given pardon power. Scholars say abuse of such power can be grounds for congressional action. It is less clear whether a conviction could mean the removal of his pension, government-funded office, and other perks.
Although impeaching a former president would be a first, there is some scant precedent for impeaching someone already removed from office. In 1797, Sen. William Blount of Tennessee was charged with treason for a scheme to help the British take land from Florida controlled by the Spanish. (Fortunately, Florida land speculation is no longer considered a treasonable offense.) Blount was unanimously impeached by the House, then expelled by the Senate (a process separate from impeachment). The Senate decided to go ahead with its impeachment trial although in the end it acquitted Blount because he was no longer in office. William Belknap, secretary of war under Ulysses Grant, was impeached by the House on bribery charges and resigned from office. Though the Senate went ahead with his trial, he, too, was acquitted because he was no longer in office.
Can Congress Impeach Bill Clinton Again?
Feb 12, 20016:57 PM
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...ton-again.html
NOTE: Former President Clinton can go to prison for his part in Uranium One:
While Clinton says that anyone who believes that she helped Russia is in the wrong, The New York Times report details how she and her husband directly helped Russia get a vested interest in the U.S. oil market.
The New York Times reported in April 2015 that the Clinton’s had a hand in helping a Russian energy company obtain drilling rights in the U.S. The Russian company had to get State Department help to purchase the Canadian company Uranium One, which made the Russian agency — Rosatom — one of the largest uranium producers in the world. Rosatom purchased the Canadian company — UrAsia — in January 2005, obtaining its uranium stakes stretching from Central Asia to Western America.
Hillary Calls Uranium One Stories ‘Debunked’
Robert Donachie
10:20 AM 10/23/2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/23/hi...ries-debunked/
To Tranquillus in Exile: I think Barr has to coverup for Hillary not Trump.
To Tranquillus in Exile: Give it a rest. Implying that poor defenseless Hillary is a victim of Right-wing conspirators is wearing thin. She can hardly be a victim since she is yet to pay for any of her crimes.
Incidentally, Hillary Clinton began committing crimes in 1979 when she was Arkansas’ first lady. That was close to 38 years before most Americans heard about Donald Trump. The question is: When did conservatives wise up enough fallback on Hillary?
Last edited by Flanders; 03-23-2019 at 09:47 AM.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
The Mueller Report is like reading the last page of a mystery novel before you read the rest of the story. Happily, Candidate Trump told us whodunit it on the first page:
Everyone knew that Hillary was the perpetrator before Mueller started his investigation. So the public has to play Lieutenant Columbo —— uncover exactly how Hillary committed the crime.
Incidentally, Democrats know how and why Hillary committed the crime; so they are demanding that the entire report be released —— not to learn something they already know —— but so they can find talking points that can whitewash Hillary’s guilty hand in the Steele Dossier:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., reiterated her call for transparency surrounding special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on his inquiry into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including that briefings to congressional committees be unclassified.
In a letter to members of the Democratic caucus on Saturday, Pelosi pointed to her statement with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., requesting Attorney General William Barr make Mueller’s full report public and turn over to Congress its underlying documentation and findings.
Pelosi calls for Mueller report briefings to be unclassified
by Melissa Quinn
March 23, 2019 02:28 PM
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...e-unclassified
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Earl (03-24-2019), Stretch (03-23-2019), USFREEDOM911 (03-24-2019)
All the FISA and dossier situation is now finally under investigation.
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
Earl (03-24-2019), Flanders (03-24-2019), USFREEDOM911 (03-24-2019)
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Earl (03-25-2019)
Judicial Watch and other anti-American watch dog groups do not run the DOJ.
Barr et al runs the Department, which gives absolutely no evidence it is paying any attention to JW et al.
But the DOJ continues to look at the campaign and Russians in other investigations.
Earl (03-25-2019)
To jimmymccready: Protecting and defending the Constitution is not anti-American. Democrats should try it once in a while.
To jimmymccready: The Clintons and their gang of traitors ran the Department of Justice under at least two Obama attorneys general —— Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch.
Note that at least three black Americans conspired with white traitors to betray the country.
To jimmymccready: A few judges are paying attention to the Freedom of Information Act.
The Department of Justice always pays attention to congressional Democrats —— but never to Constitution-loving congressional Republicans.
To jimmymccready: Which one of those investigations is investigating Hillary Clinton’s collusion with the Russians à la the Steele Dossier?
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Earl (03-24-2019)
No….TRUMP "runs" the DOJ. I am sure he will direct "his" AG to continue to investigate what he has labeled a "which hunt". Suck it up....elections have consequences. You can investigate Trump to hell and back in the political arena called Congress....but its still Trump, the Senate and the executive branch that wears the badge and the authority to charge and convict individuals for crimes. All Congress can do is strut around like a peacock.....all mouth no ass. There has never been "one" US president ever convicted of an impeachable crime.....not one....why? Its called executive privilege as defined with no ambiguity by US vs. Nixon.
If Barr insists upon a continued witch hunt.....he is not long lived in DC politics. He will go the way of the endangered species known as the DoDo Comey. Nixon "legally" fired everyone that was investigating him under the umbrella of EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE. Nixon was not removed from office HE RESIGNED (do you really expect Trump to resign because of this witchhunt?)…..and he was given a full pardon by his partner FORD.
Last edited by Ralph; 03-24-2019 at 08:17 AM.
Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
pain in abortion.
Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
which has begun. To abort life is to end it.
Earl (03-25-2019), Flanders (03-24-2019), USFREEDOM911 (03-24-2019)
Flanders (03-24-2019)
Darth Omar (04-09-2019), Flanders (03-24-2019), Stretch (03-24-2019)
boy are you cons going to be sad when all the other spun off investigations go to the courts
USFREEDOM911 (03-24-2019)
The DOJ protects the Constitution from anti-American groups right and left.
There is no way the anti-American groups in America can stop or injure these investigations of Trump et al.
Bookmarks