Stretch (03-23-2019)
Members banned from this thread: evince, zappasguitar, moon, domer76, Nomad, Mason Michaels, Jade Dragon, Troll, PoliTalker, Guno צְבִי, Adolf_Twitler, StoneByStone and lisasanders1964 |
PLAN B!
Stretch (03-23-2019)
Wait a minute, a Trumpkin just said that, "why should anyone respond to "content" that is based on nothing more then a conspiracy theory?" For real?
First off, it's not just a theory, but more importantly, "based upon nothing more than a conspiracy theory" is a classic. For ten years we have listen to conservatives and their media echo conspiracies and innuendos on anything and everything Obama/Clinton, hell, they even got a "deep state" one going based upon a dozen phrases from over five thousand plus Emails, and now they can't comment on something they think is a "conspiracy?"
Too funny
"Lack of substance?"
So you really think Trump appointed Barr cause he thought he was the best man for the job? That Barr doesn't remember Trump publicly embarrassing Sessions cause he didn't have his back? That Barr didn't know what Trump expected from his AG when he took the job, that he forgot the “Where’s my Roy Cohn," "I don't have an Attorney General?"
As I said, as designed, Barr's first summary to Congress will be generalized, say little but give Lindsey and Fox enough to echo it proved Trump did nothing, and if the actual report ever sees the light of day it will be full of redactions originated in the White House. One would have to be totally naive to think otherwise
Now give us another one of your stupid "copy and paste" videos
cancel2 2022 (03-25-2019)
Bookmarks