Mueller report given to Bar

[dukkha]

When you stop and think about it, it is pretty goofy lol.

A much more efficient way to affect an outcome would be to float a Dossier full of propaganda. Entice the media to run with it. That could have all sorts of downstream effects. It could get an SC appointed and perhaps even effectively undo the election results.

That’s definitely the way I’d go if wanted to affect an election outcome. Does anyone even read FB ads?

the whole cabal had their roles.
Looks like Bruce Ohr was getting paid by Steele and inserting the Dossier thru State contacts to the FBI,
as well as mainlining it himself WHILE warning Mccabe ( etc.) it was unverified AND Nellie Ohr worked
for Fusion GPS that started the whole fiasco -along with Glen Simpson, who just met surreptitiously with Schiff...

what a tangled web of deception!

[canceled.2021.2]

the whole cabal had their roles.
Looks like Bruce Ohr was getting paid by Steele and inserting the Dossier thru State contacts to the FBI,
as well as mainlining it himself WHILE warning Mccabe ( etc.) it w m. M n unverified AND Nellie Ohr worked
for Fusion GPS that started the whole fiasco -along with Glen Simpson, who just met surreptitiously with Schiff...

what a tangled web of deception!

Once Barr puts Mueller to bed he can begin prosecuting the Deep State


It would be great if everyone of them at a minimum was impeached for their high crimes and misdemeanors

[Darth Omar]

Once Barr puts Mueller to bed be csn


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I’ve been saying that for a while.

Any SC appointment would be predicated, at least in part, on whether any collusion was discovered by Mullet. In fact, if they appointed an SC to see how/why the IC and DOJ got it so wrong only to have Mullet validate the IC in the 11th hour—some people would have egg on their face.

It’s actually a no-brainer when you look at it that way.

I was warning the lefties about the effects of a collusion ‘non-finding’ by Mullet weeks if not months ago. They think it would simply be a case of ‘oh well, I guess we were wrong’ and then they could just proceed with another facet of the Witch Hunt as if nothing happened.

Now that Mullet has reported, all that’s left is to hear the summary then I think we’re definitely going to hear something from Horowitz and perhaps even Huber, finally.

And not a question of if, but when.

[canceled.2021.2]

I’ve been saying that for a while.

Any SC appointment would be predicated, at least in part, on whether any collusion was discovered by Mullet. In fact, if they appointed an SC to see how/why the IC and DOJ got it so wrong only to have Mullet validate the IC in the 11th hour—some people would have egg on their face.

It’s actually a no-brainer when you look at it that way.

I was warning the lefties about the effects of a collusion ‘non-finding’ by Mullet weeks if not months ago. They think it would simply be a case of ‘oh well, I guess we were wrong’ and then they could just proceed with another facet of the Witch Hunt as if nothing happened.

Now that Mullet has reported, all that’s left is to hear the summary then I think we’re definitely going to hear something from Horowitz and perhaps even Huber, finally.

And not a question of it, but when.

Don’t forget Trump has an ace up his sleeve. He can still declassify many documents particularly the FISA warrants

I remember Adam Schiff telling us he saw PROOF of collusion. And we got nothing

[Darth Omar]

Don’t forget Trump has an ace up his sleeve. He can still declassify many documents particularly the FISA warrants

I remember Adam Schiff telling us he saw PROOF of collusion. And we got nothing

He’s said that more than once.

I think he should be sanctioned by congress.

[cancel2 2022]

Didn't it look "fishy" when Bill Clinton met with Lynch on a private plane to discuss his...grandchildren?

Maybe be was just getting a haircut, or maybe he got on the wrong plane thinking it was the Lolita Express??

[Stretch]

Those four men aren't in Congress, their job is to investigate people no matter the politics.

I personally said I'd accept Mueller's findings, even if I didn't like them, because I believed he would run a fair investigation.

Cons on this site claimed that Mueller would run a biased investigation even though they had no cause to believe it, because Mueller has a clean reputation.

I am not going to say there is NOTHING until the actual report is made public.

It was wrong to have a former FBI director investigate the FBI. But, with Comey manipulating things the way he did when he leaked his note, they were able to set the table the way they wanted.

[PoliTalker]

Hello Darth,

I think half the country’s refusal to accept the legitimacy of Trump’s election has done more harm to this country than anything Trump has ever Tweeted.

And it’s not even close.

Well, my, don't we see things differently.

I see your statement as completely false.

Accepting the legitimacy of the Trump Presidency? That would be like taking hatred into your heart.

If the outright rejection of Trump's ability to lead has hurt the country, it's because President Trump has hurt and angered so many people and groups of people that he has totally brought it all on himself.

Most people do not accept deplorable, and they certainly don't want to see deplorable legitimized in any way.

No doubt we went into the 2016 election with a strongly polarized country, but Trump's entire campaign, his Presidency, and ESPECIALLY his hateful tweets has been like throwing gasoline on a campfire.

[christiefan915]

The Russians aren’t going to collude with US citizens in an election because they would get slammed with sanctions if they get caught. And get this part: the Russians can’t affect an outcome in the electoral college. It’s lunacy.

The Risk/benefit ratio is way out of wack and the Russians aren’t stupid.

C'mon Darthy, that's silly. Nobody expects to get caught when committing crimes. You think Manafort, Cohen etc. considered that during their years of wrongdoing?

The Russians (or anyone) can affect the EC indirectly. If their propaganda can get enough people to vote for a particular candidate, that candidate gets the elector.

"You help choose your state’s electors when you vote for President because when you vote for your candidate you are actually voting for your candidate’s electors.

Most states have a “winner-take-all” system that awards all electors to the winning presidential candidate. However, Maine and Nebraska each have a variation of “proportional representation.” Read more about the allocation of Electors among the states and try to predict the outcome of the Electoral College vote.

[christiefan915]

Didn't it look "fishy" when Bill Clinton met with Lynch on a private plane to discuss his...grandchildren?

Sure. That was one of the dumber things that happened and the excuse of "talking about the grandchildren" wasn't credible to me. I'd like to know what they actually talked about.

Now that's out of the way, do you agree it was equally wrong for Don Jr. to meet with a Russian and have his father write a misleading statement about it?

[christiefan915]

Since shady characters are a topic and you’re a Mullet supporter maybe you can explain why Mullet didn’t indict Tony Podesta?

If there is solid info of wrongdoing by all means indict Podesta. And when I say "solid", I don't mean messageboard info.

[dukkha]

Sure. That was one of the dumber things that happened and the excuse of "talking about the grandchildren" wasn't credible to me. I'd like to know what they actually talked about.

Now that's out of the way, do you agree it was equally wrong for Don Jr. to meet with a Russian and have his father write a misleading statement about it?

we have found out Lynch (DoJ) was REFUSING to indict Clinton on "gross negligence" despite Lynch's claim of a recusal.
Which explains the meeting and also explains the language change from "gross negligence" to"extreme carelessness"
( so as not to use statutory language to describe her behavior)

[reagansghost]

we have found out Lynch (DoJ) was REFUSING to indict Clinton on "gross negligence" despite Lynch's claim of a recusal.
Which explains the meeting and also explains the language change from "gross negligence" to"extreme carelessness"
( so as not to use statutory language to describe her behavior)

then why didn't the GOP investigation of Hillary turn anything up? why no charges?

wtf are you blathering about?

[christiefan915]

we have found out Lynch (DoJ) was REFUSING to indict Clinton on "gross negligence" despite Lynch's claim of a recusal.
Which explains the meeting and also explains the language change from "gross negligence" to"extreme carelessness"
( so as not to use statutory language to describe her behavior)

The definition of "gross negligence" is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both. It is conduct that is extreme when compared with ordinary negligence.

Hillary's actions didn't rise to that legal standard because there was no deliberate intent to do harm. It was as Comey said "extreme carelessness" and as I said "gross stupidity."

[canceled.2021.2]

I am downright fucking giddy right now. Not as good as election night 2016 but fucking close

I love all the sad lefties still clinging