LV426 (03-22-2019)
When did Michael Steele rail about deficits?
NOT IN THE FUCKING ARTICLE YOU LINKED TO, MR. #WALKAWAY
This is the only mention of deficits in the entire piece:
So he's not railing about deficits there, just pointing out that they had the opposite position on it.After Republicans approved a sweeping tax bill in December, Steele reminded viewers of its cost, and noted deficits had once been a central concern for the GOP.
Nice try, propagandist.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
It referred to "growing federal deficits." How many times does it need to be mentioned to satisfy you? You ignore the fact that all of these posts were right-wingers criticizing the budget, deficit, and other Trump policies.
Now you are asking for something different than the original post requested. You always deflect from the main issue.
Exactly.
Fiscal Terrorism
Fly planes of tax cuts into the budget, posture over the resulting deficits, then use those deficits as the excuse to cut spending on social programs they oppose on a fundamental level, but lack the courage, will, and support to repeal through conventional legislation.
That is why we must #BURNTHELIFEBOATS.
Conservatism cannot and must not survive this decade.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
"After Republicans approved a sweeping tax bill in December, Steele reminded viewers of its cost, and noted deficits had once been a central concern for the GOP.
“I think I’ve earned the right to be critical of a party that lost its way,” Steele told The Baltimore Sun. “It’s become a dumbing down to the lowest common denominator."
This is a criticism of deficits. Just because he criticizes other policies does not negate his criticism of budget issues.
For some reason you are trying very hard to ignore conservative criticism of budget deficits. I list several links and your replies are but Paul voted for the tax cut (ignoring his criticisms), but the article only mentioned the deficit once, but Steele hasn't been an elected official in years (which has nothing to do with criticizing his party for deficits).
I would also refer you to conservative columnists who have written about this issue on several occasions:
"Trump's fantasy budget may cause us to face reality" Robert Samuelson
You changed the entire subject of the discussion in which asked for links from right-wingers railing against the budget.
I was providing those links. Because that does not satisfy you has nothing to do with providing links showing conservative criticism of the deficit. You always change the topic to divert from the issue.
But it provided exactly what the poster asked for. With additional time I'm sure I can find many more conservatives critical of Trump, the deficit, the debt, tariffs, etc.
How many times the article mentioned "deficit" or how long it has been since the person has held public office are irrelevant and real stretches on your part to find something wrong with posts that provided exactly what the poster requested..
"Conservatives Rail Against Trump’s Ballooning Budget Deficit"
https://www.newsweek.com/conservativ...eficit-1333853
Bookmarks