Reply With QuoteA spoon is designed to deliver a load directed by the userOriginally Posted by Centerleftfl
Practically Perfect
You do if you are civilized.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
Banned
A spoon is designed to deliver a load directed by the user
Sweet Jane
No it’s not. Not if that contaminant isn’t specifically regulated. It was perfectly legal to sell polychlorinated biphenyls for use in dielectric fluids for years. The manufacturers of PCB’s were being sued well before they became illegal to use.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Sweet Jane
Yes but that doesn’t answer my question as to why gun manufacturers get a pass.
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Sweet Jane
Maybe it escaped your notice but is that what courts are for? Deciding such legal questions?
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Sweet Jane
...and in the hands of a blythering idiot, like Lesion, can kill!
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Insane Level of Addiction
Perhaps it escaped you, but any Judge with a brain would laugh such a case out of his courtroom.
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
Sweet Jane
Probably but even so, why should gun manufacturers be shielded? Why are the special?
You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!
Verified User
Correct . . . They aren't.
Uhhhhh, maybe them being a target for suits seeking damages for harm caused by criminal or unlawful misuse of their products by others, when the product functioned as designed and intended? Yeah, well that leftist misuse of the courts is why the shield law was needed; such claims have never been a part of civil law.
Correct, for negligence or malfunction or defect attributable to the company, which goes for gun manufacturers too. Nothing, gun manufacturers enjoy no special protection in that regard.
Correct. People are allowed to sue gun manufacturers for damages attributable to actual negligence or defective product -- that's a reason Remington wound up in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, all the lawsuits for the defect in the Model 700.
Maybe you should read the actual law?
15 U.S. Code Chapter 105 - PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS
This is a good explanation also (pdf): https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42871.pdf
GUN CONTROL LAWS ARE OSHA REGULATIONS FOR VIOLENT CRIMINALS
Eagle_Eye (03-20-2019)
It's OK to Be White
That doesn't make sense to me either. If something is legal, then why should a person have to lose money because someone else doesn't like it?
I understand it gets complicated with things like contamination, since doctors are still learning what chemicals harm us and such. But if a person is complying with FDA laws, should they lose a lawsuit over food they sold?
Banned
I don't understand your question. Should the gas station be sued when an arsonists used gasoline to start a fire? An individual used a product to do malicious acts. How the fuck do you find the maker of a product liable for the malicious acts of an individual? It's childish thinking and you should feel stupid for thinking it.
High Level of Addiction
I said they shouldn't but as we agree they did nothing negligent as far as their product. If the parents want to sue it is their right. Sadly all they will accomplish is the enrichment of some attorneys.
Biden likes little girls
What will really be tough for the car companies is that they sell products DESIGNED to break the law. Cars that do 2-3 times the max legal speed limit. How will they justify that when some pycho doing 105 runs over a kid??
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
Abatis (03-20-2019)
Biden likes little girls
If the manufacturer ENCOURAGED owners of their product to cause mayhem i could see a lawsuit. But Remington doesn't do that. OTOH the car companies sell cars to do 2-3 times the legal speed limit (!!!) and then finance movies and commercials that glorify speeding and text-driving .
Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!
THE BIG LIE - Blacks and whites are different physically but identical mentally!
There is no way 81 million americans voted for a man they know is a child molester w dementia. Impeach Joe the Pedophile Vegetable (JPV)
Verified User
If a particular gun is legal then the manufacturer is clear on all accounts. You cannot blame a gunmaker if their client misuses their product. Like the other poster wrote, "You can't accuse a carmaker if their customer runs someone over."
Posting Rules
Bookmarks