Court rules AR-15 gun maker can be sued over Sandy Hook shooting

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Can anyone explain why victims of car crashes don't sue the auto companies?. They sell cars that are DESIGNED to do 2-3 times the legal speed limit!! And they install radios and now internet access to distract drivers and cause crashes. And they air TV commercials that emphasize speeding. No company is as irresponsible as the car companies.

https://www.kvue.com/article/news/na...9-953d56bfc9dd

Updated: 11:46 AM CDT March 14, 2019

HARTFORD, Conn. — Gun maker Remington can be sued over how it marketed the Bushmaster rifle used to kill 20 children and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, a divided Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

Justices issued a 4-3 decision that reinstated a wrongful death lawsuit and overturned a lower court ruling that the lawsuit was prohibited by a 2005 federal law that shields gun manufacturers from liability in most cases when their products are used in crimes.

The plaintiffs include a survivor and relatives of nine people killed in the massacre. They argue the AR-15-style rifle used by shooter Adam Lanza is too dangerous for the public and Remington glorified the weapon in marketing it to young people.

[tinfoil]

Connecticut is liberal land. It's why I moved away. Oregon is worse. The judges are fucking nuts. The people are fucking nuts.

[tinfoil]

Sue the spoon maker! People are dying from obesity

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Sue the spoon maker! People are dying from obesity

Spoon makers don't encourage people to break the law and kill others like the auto industry does. For that matter the gun industry doesn't do that either. The car companies are just incredibly irresponsible and their product kills 35,000 americans every year and yet they don't get sued!!! I don't get it.

[Guno צְבִי]

Hey doinks, what are cars or forks and spoons and knives designed for?

Now what are guns designed for?

so doinks

[Centerleftfl]

Can anyone explain why victims of car crashes don't sue the auto companies?. They sell cars that are DESIGNED to do 2-3 times the legal speed limit!! And they install radios and now internet access to distract drivers and cause crashes. And they air TV commercials that emphasize speeding. No company is as irresponsible as the car companies.

BECAUSE DUMBASS, CARS AREN'T DESIGNED TO KILL PEOPLE!!

[StoneByStone]

Can anyone explain why victims of car crashes don't sue the auto companies?. They sell cars that are DESIGNED to do 2-3 times the legal speed limit!! And they install radios and now internet access to distract drivers and cause crashes. And they air TV commercials that emphasize speeding. No company is as irresponsible as the car companies.

I actually agree with you on this one. The AR-15 should be illegal, but as long as it remains legal, people should have every right to make and sell them.

[Centerleftfl]

Sue the spoon maker! People are dying from obesity

So spoons are DESIGNED to kill people?

[domer76]

Can anyone explain why victims of car crashes don't sue the auto companies?. They sell cars that are DESIGNED to do 2-3 times the legal speed limit!! And they install radios and now internet access to distract drivers and cause crashes. And they air TV commercials that emphasize speeding. No company is as irresponsible as the car companies.

When topics like this arise, I always wait for the lame car/gun analogy from a halfwitted barrel stroker. Well, it happened right out of the gates, folks.

And just the mentality I always expect.

Fucking dimwit

[domer76]

Sue the spoon maker! People are dying from obesity

Another barrel stroker pipes in with their laughable absurdities.

[domer76]

I actually agree with you on this one. The AR-15 should be illegal, but as long as it remains legal, people should have every right to make and sell them.

That’s not what the lawsuit was about.

[Centerleftfl]

When topics like this arise, I always wait for the lame car/gun analogy from a halfwitted barrel stroker. Well, it happened right out of the gates, folks.

And just the mentality I always expect.

Fucking dimwit

The car and gun analogy is undoubtedly the MOST STUPID FUCKING ANALOGY perhaps designed by 'men'. Constantly, day after day after day cite the same comparison as if they are genius. It has always baffled me.

(The spoon one by the other DOUBLE DIGIT IQ poster above is just too stupid for words)

PS I'm betting these assholes didn't come up with this on their own! One the Rwingshitters or wingshit sites probably came up with it and off they went. It's been around for about 4 or 5 years.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Hey doinks, what are cars or forks and spoons and knives designed for?

As i said - cars are designed to do 2-3 times the LEGAL SPEED LIMIT. How irresponsible is that?

Cars should be designed just for transportation and that means governors to keep speeds within legal limits and NO electronic toys like radios and internet access for the driver to play with. THINK

[Text Drivers are Killers]

When topics like this arise, I always wait for the lame car/gun analogy from a halfwitted barrel stroker. Well, it happened right out of the gates, folks.

HAHAHA. The board notes you have no rebuttal to the gun/car analogy. Even you realize cars are a far bigger and far more correctable problem than guns.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

The car and gun analogy is undoubtedly the MOST STUPID FUCKING ANALOGY perhaps designed by 'men'. Constantly, day after day after day cite the same comparison as if they are genius. It has always baffled me.

HAHAHA. No - you just don't have an answer to the gun/car analogy. You want to BAN GUNS because it MIGHT save a handful of lives a year and yet you would howl if we did a minor thing like lowering speed limits back to 55 even though that would undoubtedly save thousands of live every year as it did in 1974. THINK, hater.