Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 100

Thread: Congresswoman allows terrorist group in her office

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    15,513
    Thanks
    2,641
    Thanked 7,884 Times in 5,739 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 229 Times in 222 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Do these fat chicks also cook, clean house, do laundry, run errands, clean bird cages? If so, where might I find one? lol
    No. You see Katzgar wears the pants in his family. They are right there under his apron.
    Consider the Oyster.

    C-4 is just angry playdoh.

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 839 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 43 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    You provided an answer you called correct.

    I gave it and you ignored it. Don't blame it on me. That's so Liberal.
    No, you gave nothing. You simply said the "religious test" clause does not mean (as it says) that there can be no religious test for holding any federal office. You said that was incorrect.

    What was the post # in which you explained the correct interpretation?

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    35,373
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 4,209 Times in 3,825 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 372 Times in 361 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    No, you gave nothing. You simply said the "religious test" clause does not mean (as it says) that there can be no religious test for holding any federal office. You said that was incorrect.

    What was the post # in which you explained the correct interpretation?
    It's been posted once. It's obviously the one you ignored and now expect me to provide again for your lazy ass.

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 839 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 43 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    It's been posted once. It's obviously the one you ignored and now expect me to provide again for your lazy ass.
    I just checked all the posts on this topic. You never explained what you think the "religious test" clause means.

    This is your typical pattern. Claim others are wrong, refuse to give your interpretation, and then claim you did. You then spend ten posts claiming you already posted your explanation but never do so.

  5. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    35,373
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 4,209 Times in 3,825 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 372 Times in 361 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    I just checked all the posts on this topic. You never explained what you think the "religious test" clause means.

    This is your typical pattern. Claim others are wrong, refuse to give your interpretation, and then claim you did. You then spend ten posts claiming you already posted your explanation but never do so.
    It's obvious you didn't you only claimed to have done so to make yourself feel less embarrassed.

    This is your typical pattern. Make a claim, refuse to acknowledge it's been refuted, then blame others for your 2nd class place in life.

  6. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 839 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 43 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    It's obvious you didn't you only claimed to have done so to make yourself feel less embarrassed.

    This is your typical pattern. Make a claim, refuse to acknowledge it's been refuted, then blame others for your 2nd class place in life.
    I've tried to get you to refute my claims on several occasions but the best you can do is say a person is wrong.

    Give us the post # that refutes my explanation and gives another explanation for the "religious test" clause and I will admit CFM is always right and wise.

    Otherwise you are a liar.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash For This Post:


  8. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Blue Ridge
    Posts
    20,910
    Thanks
    11,892
    Thanked 5,685 Times in 4,651 Posts
    Groans
    1,633
    Groaned 933 Times in 848 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    You'd need to be a lot taller.
    I can raise my elbow above my head, dude. Can't you?

  9. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    35,373
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 4,209 Times in 3,825 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 372 Times in 361 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    I've tried to get you to refute my claims on several occasions but the best you can do is say a person is wrong.

    Give us the post # that refutes my explanation and gives another explanation for the "religious test" clause and I will admit CFM is always right and wise.

    Otherwise you are a liar.
    I have refuted your claims on several occasions and you refuse to acknowledge it.

    I've already posted it. I'm not going to do the work for you. If you won't look for what's already been posted, you will always be viewed as a lazy bastard. Are you black?

  10. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 839 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 43 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    I have refuted your claims on several occasions and you refuse to acknowledge it.

    I've already posted it. I'm not going to do the work for you. If you won't look for what's already been posted, you will always be viewed as a lazy bastard. Are you black?
    In other words, you cannot find that post because it does not exist but you are not honest enough to admit it.

    I already searched for it and have every post you made since the original post about the "religious test" clause. Nowhere did you do anything but claim the obvious meaning was not correct. You never refuted anything or explained an alternative (incorrect) interpretation. You are too lazy to give us a simple post #.

  11. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    35,373
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 4,209 Times in 3,825 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 372 Times in 361 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    In other words, you cannot find that post because it does not exist but you are not honest enough to admit it.

    I already searched for it and have every post you made since the original post about the "religious test" clause. Nowhere did you do anything but claim the obvious meaning was not correct. You never refuted anything or explained an alternative (incorrect) interpretation. You are too lazy to give us a simple post #.
    You claim to have searched and refuse to acknowledge what you said was completely refuted.

    You're too lazy to look and want to blame it on someone else you lazy son of a bitch. Are you black? You sure act like one.

  12. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 839 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 43 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    You claim to have searched and refuse to acknowledge what you said was completely refuted.

    You're too lazy to look and want to blame it on someone else you lazy son of a bitch. Are you black? You sure act like one.
    That post does not exist and you can't prove it does. That makes you a liar. And you obviously have no understanding of the "no religious test" in the Constitution.

  13. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    35,373
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 4,209 Times in 3,825 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 372 Times in 361 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    That post does not exist and you can't prove it does. That makes you a liar. And you obviously have no understanding of the "no religious test" in the Constitution.
    The post does exist and you're lazy to look for it.

  14. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 839 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 43 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    The post does exist and you're lazy to look for it.
    You are delusional. I'm concerned because you might think that post actually exists even though you have no clue what the "no religious test" doctrine means and thus were never able to explain it and still cannot.

  15. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    35,373
    Thanks
    154
    Thanked 4,209 Times in 3,825 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 372 Times in 361 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    You are delusional. I'm concerned because you might think that post actually exists even though you have no clue what the "no religious test" doctrine means and thus were never able to explain it and still cannot.
    I posted it. If you can't find it, that's your problem. Maybe you're simply too fucking stupid to even realize how fucking stupid you are. People like you are the very reason I oppose the free college bullshit proposed by the left. You're K-12 education was a waste of money. Some people simply aren't worth spending money on because it provides no return.

  16. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 839 Posts
    Groans
    15
    Groaned 43 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    I posted it. If you can't find it, that's your problem. Maybe you're simply too fucking stupid to even realize how fucking stupid you are. People like you are the very reason I oppose the free college bullshit proposed by the left. You're K-12 education was a waste of money. Some people simply aren't worth spending money on because it provides no return.
    When the insults begin you always know the person has nothing substantive left to say and can only make up stuff and attack them. When someone could easily prove their claims by listing the post # but will not do so, you always know they are lying. A blatant racist who is calling somebody else stupid tells us something.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-01-2019, 10:53 AM
  2. Democrat party terrorist group ANTIFA cheers McCain's death
    By Teflon Don in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-27-2018, 04:51 PM
  3. Deranged fascist terrorist group to launch attack on 24 million Americans
    By New! Imperialism and Genocide™ in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-13-2017, 05:58 PM
  4. Twitter gives official "verified" badge to terrorist group, but bans conservatives
    By BillyShouldPostMore in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-09-2017, 04:34 AM
  5. APP - when is a terrorist group not a terrorist group
    By Don Quixote in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-03-2011, 10:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •