Reply With Quotechristiefan915 (03-04-2019)
Verified User
Kamala’s Fee?
Kamala Harris lost the United Nations crowd:
Decriminalizing prostitution — an idea gaining momentum among some Democrats, including at least one 2020 presidential contender — may one day be traced back to the hookers plying their trade under the elevated train along New York City’s Roosevelt Avenue.
That open-air market of prostitutes and johns in Queens, undeterred by constant threat of arrest and incarceration, has been cited by New York state lawmakers mulling whether it’s time to wave the white flag in the war on the world’s oldest profession.
Kamala Harris gains momentum among Democrats with proposal to legalize prostitution
By Seth McLaughlin
Sunday, March 3, 2019
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ization-propo/
Some years ago, the United Nations outlawed prostitution. The ban was instrumental in closing down a great many houses of ill repute worldwide; driving painted ladies into bars where they supplemented their legitimate incomes with watered-down drinks.
I cracked up in 2009 when I read that American taxpayer were training Chinese hustling girls to “drink responsibly.” Did that mean more water in the drinks? Or did it mean more alcohol?
The grant, made last November, refers to prostitutes as "female sex workers"--or FSW--and their handlers as "gatekeepers."
CNSNews.com
U.S. Will Pay $2.6 Million to Train Chinese Prostitutes to Drink Responsibly on the Job
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
By Edwin Mora
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...esponsibly-job
NOTE: Pimps of the world thanked Hillary. Calling pimps gatekeepers gave them legitimacy. In 1998 then-First Lady Hillary Clinton called for an Internet gate-keeping function:
As exciting as these new developments are.... there are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gate-keeping function. What does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation, or to respond to what someone says?
You know that touchy-feely mutts will become the face of American women in the future now that Miss America is no longer allowed to wear a bathing suit it is fair to say the B.S. rule is an attack on capitalism.
The lunacy of kicking ‘beauty’ out of the Miss America pageant
By Jonah Goldberg
June 8, 2018 | 7:20pm
https://nypost.com/2018/06/08/the-lu...erica-pageant/
Not to worry. Even the Mad Russian put in with a touch of free enterprise:
Comey: Trump says Putin bragged about Russia having the 'most beautiful hookers in the world'
By Avery Anapol - 04/19/18 09:48 PM EDT
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...aving-the-most
Women have performed sex for money in every country and culture since the beginning of time. The money today’s top call girls earn every year is peanuts compared to what an ambitious woman can earn by getting ahead in a major industry. I cannot tell you how much those leggy broads on Outnumbered are paid, but I can tell you it ain’t because of their brains.
Beauty commands a higher price in every field where sex is sold ——— from high-priced call girls to streetwalkers. How bad can any economy be when competent working girls make a thousand dollars an hour?
After listening to Stella By Starlight, that beautiful melody written for a 1944 ghost movie The Uninvited, I was reminded of an old message of mine from May of 2002 that I update and post from time to time.
When the girls compete in a knocking shop like a bar or a cathouse you will find Stella by Starlight on the payroll. Stella is only trotted out if a prospective buyer refuses to pay for the charms offered by lesser lights. Even in those tart shops where all of the working girls possess physical beauty there is a Stella in attendance who shines just a little brighter than her sisters. Stella is like the shiniest used car on the lot; she may not perform all that well, but she still commands the highest price.
I must say that I neither condone nor condemn the Stella Principle. It is a fact of life. I suspect that if we went back to the first cave of ill repute we would find a Stella who commanded more colored pebbles than her sisters got for putting their heels behind their ears. In truth, prostitution invented money eons ago regardless of every economic system that came and went.
Sales techniques in almost every field are predicated on the Stella by Starlight Principle. Of course there are some areas where Stella is not required. For example: One does not buy a pill because it is more beautiful than all of the other pills; nevertheless, beauty (packaging) is a sales aid in most realms of commerce. Beautiful women sell cosmetics to plain Janes, not the other way around. Magazine publishers feature young men and women of beautiful face and form in order to sell their magazines. Mags would not attempt to sell their publications by featuring unbecoming subjects in various stages of undress.
In effect, Socialists always denied the existence of physical beauty. At the very least, Socialism denies the value of beauty when it comes to selling. That explains the drab, unattractive, world Socialists/Communists have in store for everyone except themselves.
Socialism is driven by envy; so it is reasonable to say that tax-dollar wealthy Socialists get sick with envy when have to pay for it while a beautiful hustling girl screws a working class nobody for free.
NOTE: Most of the abuse women experience at the hands of people like Harvey Weinstein looking for free sex. Basically, they have tons of money, but they resent paying for it out of their own pockets when they can force themselves on respectable women.
Socialism’s sick insistence that inner-beauty is the only beauty that means anything is evident in almost every touchy-feely issue that Socialists promote. By denying physical beauty its due it then becomes easier for Socialists to denounce excellence in everything else.
Socialists denying the importance of external beauty face the consequences of eventual defeat followed by certain ridicule. Or perhaps Communist moralists think they can do away with prostitution while using the Stella Principle to further Communism? If that is what they are up to lately they obviously do not understand the Stella Principle. An immutable rationale that will always contradict Communism whether or not prostitution is involved in financial transactions.
The Communist hogwash that says “Prostitution is the cornerstone of capitalism” makes me think that Socialists have to do away with all selling if their religion is to survive. How can a Socialist/Communist system of government allow sales of any kind to exist if one of Communism’s basic tenets is true?
Oddly enough, prostitution is the last outpost of collective bargaining left untouched by Big Brother’s intrusion into every aspect of private sector life. The irony is that Communism unwittingly guaranties prostitution’s growth because it leaves freedom of choice to the individual in that one realm while denying it everywhere else.
If capitalism is dependent upon prostitution, which I doubt, it is the premium that prostitution places on beauty. Beauty commands a higher price in every venue that allows women to sell their sexual wares; that is in hotels, bars, cathouses, cribs, and call girl services. Even the incomes of freelance streetwalkers is determined by beauty.
Ms. Harris’ legalizing prostitution might be nothing more than erasing the stigma attached to her own well-paying job(s). The question is: How much does she charge for her services these days?
Kamala Harris ‘Slept Her Way to the Top’ – Former Mayor Says
January 29, 2019
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
https://newspunch.com/kamala-harris-...-former-mayor/
Finally, I am not sure where Hillary Clinton fits into Kamala Harris’ definition of legal prostitution. Hillary has been raised up by the media for decades. She is still the smartest woman in the world as far as I know. She almost rode to the presidency riding on her husband’s coattails. On the other hand she did not put a dent in Bubba’s skull with a frying pan because he was getting blow jobs in the downstairs parlor while she was upstairs baking cookies.
Last edited by Flanders; 03-04-2019 at 02:39 AM.
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
christiefan915 (03-04-2019)
Truth Detector (04-01-2019)
Oderint dum metuant
DEMOCRATS want you to think Kameltoe the Ho told Willie she'd indict him for jaywalking, don't they?Originally Posted by Flanders
High Level of Addiction
JPP Contributor
Kamala Harris lost the United Nations crowd:
Decriminalizing prostitution — an idea gaining momentum among some Democrats, including at least one 2020 presidential contender — may one day be traced back to the hookers plying their trade under the elevated train along New York City’s Roosevelt Avenue.
That open-air market of prostitutes and johns in Queens, undeterred by constant threat of arrest and incarceration, has been cited by New York state lawmakers mulling whether it’s time to wave the white flag in the war on the world’s oldest profession.
Kamala Harris gains momentum among Democrats with proposal to legalize prostitution
By Seth McLaughlin
Sunday, March 3, 2019
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ization-propo/
Some years ago, the United Nations outlawed prostitution. The ban was instrumental in closing down a great many houses of ill repute worldwide; driving painted ladies into bars where they supplemented their legitimate incomes with watered-down drinks.
I cracked up in 2009 when I read that American taxpayer were training Chinese hustling girls to “drink responsibly.” Did that mean more water in the drinks? Or did it mean more alcohol?
The grant, made last November, refers to prostitutes as "female sex workers"--or FSW--and their handlers as "gatekeepers."
CNSNews.com
U.S. Will Pay $2.6 Million to Train Chinese Prostitutes to Drink Responsibly on the Job
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
By Edwin Mora
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...esponsibly-job
NOTE: Pimps of the world thanked Hillary. Calling pimps gatekeepers gave them legitimacy. In 1998 then-First Lady Hillary Clinton called for an Internet gate-keeping function:
As exciting as these new developments are.... there are a number of serious issues without any kind of editing function or gate-keeping function. What does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation, or to respond to what someone says?
You know that touchy-feely mutts will become the face of American women in the future now that Miss America is no longer allowed to wear a bathing suit it is fair to say the B.S. rule is an attack on capitalism.
The lunacy of kicking ‘beauty’ out of the Miss America pageant
By Jonah Goldberg
June 8, 2018 | 7:20pm
https://nypost.com/2018/06/08/the-lu...erica-pageant/
Not to worry. Even the Mad Russian put in with a touch of free enterprise:
Comey: Trump says Putin bragged about Russia having the 'most beautiful hookers in the world'
By Avery Anapol - 04/19/18 09:48 PM EDT
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...aving-the-most
Women have performed sex for money in every country and culture since the beginning of time. The money today’s top call girls earn every year is peanuts compared to what an ambitious woman can earn by getting ahead in a major industry. I cannot tell you how much those leggy broads on Outnumbered are paid, but I can tell you it ain’t because of their brains.
Beauty commands a higher price in every field where sex is sold ——— from high-priced call girls to streetwalkers. How bad can any economy be when competent working girls make a thousand dollars an hour?
After listening to Stella By Starlight, that beautiful melody written for a 1944 ghost movie The Uninvited, I was reminded of an old message of mine from May of 2002 that I update and post from time to time.
When the girls compete in a knocking shop like a bar or a cathouse you will find Stella by Starlight on the payroll. Stella is only trotted out if a prospective buyer refuses to pay for the charms offered by lesser lights. Even in those tart shops where all of the working girls possess physical beauty there is a Stella in attendance who shines just a little brighter than her sisters. Stella is like the shiniest used car on the lot; she may not perform all that well, but she still commands the highest price.
I must say that I neither condone nor condemn the Stella Principle. It is a fact of life. I suspect that if we went back to the first cave of ill repute we would find a Stella who commanded more colored pebbles than her sisters got for putting their heels behind their ears. In truth, prostitution invented money eons ago regardless of every economic system that came and went.
Sales techniques in almost every field are predicated on the Stella by Starlight Principle. Of course there are some areas where Stella is not required. For example: One does not buy a pill because it is more beautiful than all of the other pills; nevertheless, beauty (packaging) is a sales aid in most realms of commerce. Beautiful women sell cosmetics to plain Janes, not the other way around. Magazine publishers feature young men and women of beautiful face and form in order to sell their magazines. Mags would not attempt to sell their publications by featuring unbecoming subjects in various stages of undress.
In effect, Socialists always denied the existence of physical beauty. At the very least, Socialism denies the value of beauty when it comes to selling. That explains the drab, unattractive, world Socialists/Communists have in store for everyone except themselves.
Socialism is driven by envy; so it is reasonable to say that tax-dollar wealthy Socialists get sick with envy when have to pay for it while a beautiful hustling girl screws a working class nobody for free.
NOTE: Most of the abuse women experience at the hands of people like Harvey Weinstein looking for free sex. Basically, they have tons of money, but they resent paying for it out of their own pockets when they can force themselves on respectable women.
Socialism’s sick insistence that inner-beauty is the only beauty that means anything is evident in almost every touchy-feely issue that Socialists promote. By denying physical beauty its due it then becomes easier for Socialists to denounce excellence in everything else.
Socialists denying the importance of external beauty face the consequences of eventual defeat followed by certain ridicule. Or perhaps Communist moralists think they can do away with prostitution while using the Stella Principle to further Communism? If that is what they are up to lately they obviously do not understand the Stella Principle. An immutable rationale that will always contradict Communism whether or not prostitution is involved in financial transactions.
The Communist hogwash that says “Prostitution is the cornerstone of capitalism” makes me think that Socialists have to do away with all selling if their religion is to survive. How can a Socialist/Communist system of government allow sales of any kind to exist if one of Communism’s basic tenets is true?
Oddly enough, prostitution is the last outpost of collective bargaining left untouched by Big Brother’s intrusion into every aspect of private sector life. The irony is that Communism unwittingly guaranties prostitution’s growth because it leaves freedom of choice to the individual in that one realm while denying it everywhere else.
If capitalism is dependent upon prostitution, which I doubt, it is the premium that prostitution places on beauty. Beauty commands a higher price in every venue that allows women to sell their sexual wares; that is in hotels, bars, cathouses, cribs, and call girl services. Even the incomes of freelance streetwalkers is determined by beauty.
Ms. Harris’ legalizing prostitution might be nothing more than erasing the stigma attached to her own well-paying job(s). The question is: How much does she charge for her services these days?
Kamala Harris ‘Slept Her Way to the Top’ – Former Mayor Says
January 29, 2019
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
https://newspunch.com/kamala-harris-...-former-mayor/
Finally, I am not sure where Hillary Clinton fits into Kamala Harris’ definition of legal prostitution. Hillary has been raised up by the media for decades. She is still the smartest woman in the world as far as I know. She almost rode to the presidency riding on her husband’s coattails. On the other hand she did not put a dent in Bubba’s skull with a frying pan because he was getting blow jobs in the downstairs parlor while she was upstairs baking cookies.
MAGA MAN (03-04-2019)
christiefan915 (03-04-2019)
Verified User
To Legion: That is probably why they are laughing:
I will wager they are not laughing now:
“Look at Kamala Harris, who I call Kama Sutra Harris. We all know what she did… She slept her way to the bottom.” Roseanne Barr
https://madamenoire.com/1063079/rose...kamala-harris/
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
It's OK to Be White
Do you still ban half the forum from your posts because you're afraid they'll embarrass you?
Oderint dum metuant
Liberals are impervious to facts. That's what makes them liberal.
SHE UNDRESSED FOR WILLIE BROWN, A MARRIED MAN TWICE HER AGE IN EXCHANGE FOR POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS
QUID PRO QUO - HE TAPPED DAT AZZ - NOW YOU KNOW HER "QUALIFICATIONS"
Former San Franshitsco Mayor Willie Brown addressed his past extramarital relationship with U.S. Sen. Kum-Allah Hairless in his weekly column in the San Franshitsco Chronicle, saying he may have boosted the presidential hopeful's career.
"Yes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago," Brown wrote.
Brown appointed Hairless - who reportedly shaves her bush - to two well-paid state commission assignments on the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and the California Medical Assistance Commission. The former mayor also connected Hairless with campaign donors.
"Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker. And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Franshitsco."
Questions about Brown’s relationship with Hairless began anew after she announced her 2020 presidential bid on Martin Luther King Day.
During his two terms as mayor of San Franshitsco, Brown was known for his arrogance and ego, according to a 1996 profile in People magazine. Named one of the world’s 10 sexiest men by Playgirl magazine in 1984, Brown sometimes attended parties with his wife on one arm and a girlfriend on the other, according to a reporter quoted by the magazine.
Brown, 84, and Hairless broke up in 1995 but remained political allies. In Saturday's column, Brown said Hairless is "riding a buzz wave the likes of which we haven’t seen in years."
Brown pointed out that he also "helped the careers" of other prominent California FEMOCRATS, such as U.S. House Speaker nattering Nancy Pelosi and evil-looking nonagenarian Dianne Feinstein. Brown also fathered a child in 2001 with his former fundraiser, Carolyn Carpeneti.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-san-francisco-mayor-addresses-past-relationship-with-sen-kamala-harris
Oderint dum metuant
Just the stupid half and their "additional" alter egos.
Verified User
Socialists found a way for hustling girls to sell sex and and pay them with with tax dollars!
April 1, 2019 —In a secret memorandum obtained exclusively by The American Spectator, New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, are pressing leading Democrats to support a call for government-paid free sex, saying that “sex is a human right.” The memorandum was scheduled to be released on April 1st.
The Mayor, in a statement to be issued by his press secretary, said:
“This is the city that will be paying for direct comprehensive sex (not just one-night stands) for people who can’t afford it, or can’t get comprehensive sex — including 300,000 undocumented New Yorkers.”
Ocasio-Cortez said the call for a “right to sex” was being added to the Green New Deal. She added that “sex for all” would provide “jobs, jobs, jobs” to replace the jobs lost when Amazon pulled out of New York City.
I guess government pimps forgot that:
You know every bow-wow will bargain for fees on par with Stella by Starlight:
Sanders, a presidential candidate, has prepared an Op-Ed for the New York Times, which says in part:
This is a pivotal moment in American history. Do we, as a nation, lead the rest of the industrialized world and guarantee comprehensive sex care to every person as a human right? Or do we maintain a system that is enormously prudish, frigid and theocratic, and is designed to maximize sexual profits for good looking people, the Big Marriage industry, parts of Nevada and medical equipment suppliers?
All over this country, I have heard from Americans who have shared heartbreaking stories about our sexual dysfunctional system. Doctors have told me about patients who died because they put off their sex care until it was too late. These were people who had no sex or could not afford out-of-pocket costs imposed by illicit sex workers.
I have heard from older people who have been forced to split their Viagra or birth control pills in half because they couldn’t pay the outrageously high price of prescription drugs. Dr. Ruth has told me about sex therapy patients who have been unable to acquire lifesaving daily sex treatments because they could not afford them. This should not be happening in the world’s wealthiest country.
The Spectator has also learned that the plan is going to be enthusiastically endorsed by former President Bill Clinton and famed Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.
A source has informed the Spectator that Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is demanding that free beer be added to any legislation.
For her part, Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez also says this in the memo:
Sex and our sexual challenges are one of the biggest existential threats to our way of life, not just as a nation, but as a world. In order for us to combat that threat, we must be as ambitious and innovative with sex as possible. Free, government-paid sex is the first step in saving the world. Not to mention that since the planet is expected to die in 12 years if we don’t act on climate change, it will be important for Americans to get as much as they can now before the end arrives.
She added:
This is an investment. For every dollar we spend on a sexual infrastructure, we get more than a dollar back for that investment. We get happy people. We get more people.
Former Vice President Al Gore, in a recent speech to the South by Southwest (SXSW), was anticipating the new move. Said Gore:
We have this sex denial industry cranked up constantly, In addition to 99 percent of the scientists and all the professional scientific organizations, now Mother Nature is weighing in. She is making it plain she has no time for the sex deniers. How, she is asking, does anyone think I got to be a mother in the first place?
The Spectator is still reaching out to the fifty dozen Democratic presidential candidates other than Sanders for comment.
AOC, Bernie, De Blasio: Free Sex For All
by Jeffrey Lord
April 1, 2019, 12:06 AM
https://spectator.org/aoc-bernie-de-...78e5-104423221
Alas, Steny Hoyer will have to jump in when johns refuse to stick their dicks in mutts even if it is “free.”:
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said that the individual health insurance mandates included in every health reform bill, which require Americans to have insurance, were “like paying taxes.” He added that Congress has “broad authority” to force Americans to purchase other things as well, so long as it was trying to promote “the general welfare.”
The Congressional Budget Office, however, has stated in the past that a mandate forcing Americans to buy health insurance would be an “unprecedented form of federal action,” and that the “government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.”
Hoyer Says Constitution’s ‘General Welfare’ Clause Empowers Congress to Order Americans to Buy Health Insurance
October 21, 2009
By Matt COVER
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hoye...-americans-buy
The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible. Eric Hoffer
Posting Rules
Bookmarks