Did Bar order Mueller tro finish?????

[PostmodernProphet]

It carries weight with a sizable majority of the American public. It's just that within your own sub-culture (the 40% or so who support Trump), the world looks quite different.

it won't carry any weight at all when it becomes obvious there is nothing there.......

[PostmodernProphet]

the evidence possessed by Mueller, the SDNY, the VA and NY AG's for starters

doesn't exist.......

[PostmodernProphet]

He was "taking the piss of me" by lying about what I said. He should ask himself why he felt compelled to do that, rather than to address what I actually said. And you should ask yourself why you felt to compelled to defend that dishonest evasion. Think about it.

I felt compelled to tell the truth about you......sorry......sucks to be you, but its not my fault.......

[PostmodernProphet]

Maybe you could try being less pompous and up your arse, good luck with that!

and less stupid.......that would certainly help......

[PostmodernProphet]

Stone, Comey? Ok . That is how you think.

Stone and Comey were not convicted of anything that has anything to do with Trump........that's how everyone thinks......

[Truth Detector]

Idiot! LOL!

Yes, you most definitely are.

[PostmodernProphet]

It was clearly a violation of a plain reading of campaign finance law

why do you feel compelled to lie?......if it was a clear violation of campaign finance law Jr. would have been indicted in 2016.......

[Oneuli]

has to be a tangible asset. opposition research is not a thing of value

Anything of Value Law and Legal Definition
https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/anything-of-value/

No, there's nothing in the statute saying it has to be a tangible asset. As you can see from the link you shared, that's not the way the term is used in the law -- there are many things expressly listed in that definition that are intangible -- for example, forgiveness of debt, a right of action, services, etc. Did you share the link without first reading the page?

Opposition research is, of course, a thing of value. There's a reason that candidates pay consultants, all the time, to do opposition research. It is a thing that is seen as having great value to a campaign. The reason you want to assert otherwise has nothing at all to do with legal precedent or common sense. It's pure politics. You want the Trump campaign to be innocent of lawbreaking, so you're reading things into the law to excuse what they did.

[Oneuli]

it won't carry any weight at all when it becomes obvious there is nothing there.......

It has long been clear that there's a lot there. The question now is just how much.

[Oneuli]

why do you feel compelled to lie?......if it was a clear violation of campaign finance law Jr. would have been indicted in 2016.......

What makes you think that? Many people aren't indicted for crimes until well after their commission.

[Oneuli]

I felt compelled to tell the truth about you.........

No. As you know, you lied. You should ask yourself why you feel compelled to build your arguments on obvious falsehoods.

[Oneuli]

.....that's exactly what the words you said mean.......y.

As everyone here can plainly see, that's not even close to what the words I said mean. Why humiliate yourself this way?

[volsrock]

all of the sudden its coming to a close just as Bar takes the seat

all of a sudden?

Tell us again how long this been going on

[PostmodernProphet]

What makes you think that? Many people aren't indicted for crimes until well after their commission.

only if the prosecutors have not found evidence warranting indictment......

[PostmodernProphet]

No. As you know, you lied. You should ask yourself why you feel compelled to build your arguments on obvious falsehoods.

I did not.....