Did Bar order Mueller tro finish?????

[Truth Detector]

Storm the palace.

Bring it on BOY!

[Truth Detector]

We will storm the palace.

BLUE WAVE!! IT was HUUUUUGGGEEEE! A really BIG one!!!

[Truth Detector]

so what you're saying is, if Mueller has found nothing we need a special counsel appointed to investigate why Mueller found nothing?.......

Dishonest lying liberals really are THAT fucking dumb.

[Truth Detector]

It certainly is. Just to take one particularly infamous example, consider the Trump Tower meeting. At the time when Trump's brat, his campaign head, and his son-in-law agreed to that meeting, they had express evidence that the meeting was intended to share valuable information to benefit the campaign, as part of the Putin regime's efforts to get Trump elected. They also had ample reason to expect what would be shared was stolen information. At that point, any patriotic citizen would have gone right to the FBI to inform them of this attempt by a hostile foreign government to interfere with a US election. But, instead, the Trump team actively solicited such information.

That's all public knowledge and it's damning. Imagine, for a moment, your political prejudices ran the opposite way. Imagine, for example that instead of the Trump team soliciting campaign assistance from the Russian government, it had been Bill and Chelsea Clinton and the head of the Clinton campaign trying to get the Iranian government to share valuable damaging material about Trump, expressly as part of the Iranian government's support for Hillary's campaign. I expect then that you would recognize how damning that evidence was.

Nothing illegal snowflake. You gonna cry now?

[Truth Detector]

Squawk! Process Crime!
Squawk! Fake news!
Squawk! Enemy of the people!
Squawk! Uranium One!
Squawk! No collusion!
Squawk! Witch hunt!
Squawk! Cabal!

Low life LOW IQ leftist triggered.

[Nordberg]

dear fucking idiot....people have gone to prison for things that have nothing to do with Trump or his election.......that is in fact, nothing.......

Stone, Comey? Ok . That is how you think.

[Nordberg]

All of the sudden? Liberals have predicting 'this is it!' for the last 18 months.

If you were paying attention, that is what rightys posted over and over.

[Nordberg]

Rosenstein is in charge.

[Oneuli]

Maybe you could try being less pompous and up your arse....

Nah. I enjoy making people like you look ridiculous, and giving free rein to my pomposity is part of that. The pomposity provokes you to come at me over and over, and that in turn leads to these inevitable pratfalls of yours. Why would I change to save you that fate?

[Oneuli]

BLUE WAVE!! IT was HUUUUUGGGEEEE! A really BIG one!!!

Yes, it certainly was. It was one of the largest popular margins, in both the House and Senate, on record.

[Oneuli]

Nothing illegal snowflake.

It was clearly a violation of a plain reading of campaign finance law, which says that it is illegal to solicit anything of value from a foreign national for a US political campaign. In order to say it wasn't illegal, you either need to assert that "thing of value" has an unwritten exception to exclude valuable information, or you have to claim that the law itself is unconstitutional, despite no rulings to support that notion.

[cancel2 2022]

Nah. I enjoy making people like you look ridiculous, and giving free rein to my pomposity is part of that. The pomposity provokes you to come at me over and over, and that in turn leads to these inevitable pratfalls of yours. Why would I change to save you that fate?

I would suggest that your pomposity is baked in, no need to call back it up when needed, it's your default setting.

[Oneuli]

I would suggest that your pomposity is baked in, no need to call back it up when needed, it's your default setting.

Around you, that's true. It's hard not to feel pretty stuck on myself when you're the immediately available point of reference.

[anatta]

It was clearly a violation of a plain reading of campaign finance law, which says that it is illegal to solicit anything of value from a foreign national for a US political campaign. In order to say it wasn't illegal, you either need to assert that "thing of value" has an unwritten exception to exclude valuable information, or you have to claim that the law itself is unconstitutional, despite no rulings to support that notion.

has to be a tangible asset. opposition research is not a thing of value

Anything of Value Law and Legal Definition
https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/anything-of-value/

[cancel2 2022]

has to be a tangible asset. opposition research is not a thing of value

Anything of Value Law and Legal Definition
https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/anything-of-value/

So what was the Steel Dossier then?