Originally Posted by
Oneuli
It certainly is. Just to take one particularly infamous example, consider the Trump Tower meeting. At the time when Trump's brat, his campaign head, and his son-in-law agreed to that meeting, they had express evidence that the meeting was intended to share valuable information to benefit the campaign, as part of the Putin regime's efforts to get Trump elected. They also had ample reason to expect what would be shared was stolen information. At that point, any patriotic citizen would have gone right to the FBI to inform them of this attempt by a hostile foreign government to interfere with a US election. But, instead, the Trump team actively solicited such information.
That's all public knowledge and it's damning. Imagine, for a moment, your political prejudices ran the opposite way. Imagine, for example that instead of the Trump team soliciting campaign assistance from the Russian government, it had been Bill and Chelsea Clinton and the head of the Clinton campaign trying to get the Iranian government to share valuable damaging material about Trump, expressly as part of the Iranian government's support for Hillary's campaign. I expect then that you would recognize how damning that evidence was.
Bookmarks